Crime Three people killed and eight wounded in Brooklyn lounge shooting, police say

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
@Silver
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
12,595
Reaction score
15,530
Victims ranged from ages 27 to 61 after multiple gunmen opened fire after what police suspect was gang violence

Edward Helmore in New York

Three people were killed and eight others wounded when multiple gunmen opened fire inside a crowded Brooklyn hookah lounge and restaurant early on Sunday morning, according to authorities.

Police officers responded to reports of a shooting inside the Taste of the City lounge in Crown Heights just before 3.30am, New York police department (NYPD) commissioner, Jessica Tisch, said at a press briefing later on Sunday.


Citing a preliminary, ongoing investigation, Tisch said it appeared the shooting stemmed from gang violence.

The three people who were killed were all men and were all pronounced dead at the scene. They were ages 19, 27 and 35, police said.

Attributing the information to friends, the New York Daily News identified one of those slain as 35-year-old Jamel Andre Childs. Childs was killed while trying to stop a fight that preceded the shooting, the Daily News reported.


Of 11 victims, Tisch added, eight were men and three were women. Their known ages ranged from 27 to 61.

The eight wounded victims – five men and three women – were taken to local hospitals with what police said were non-life threatening injuries.

Tisch said there were at least four different shooters who fired dozens of rounds in the lounge, striking numerous bystanders. She also said officers had collected at least 42 shell casings inside the lounge that came from 9mm and .45-caliber guns.

Officers had recovered one gun near the scene of the shooting, and they were trying to determine whether it was connected to the case, Tisch said. Investigators did not immediately name any suspects or announce arrests.

Tisch made it a point to say New York City had registered “the lowest number of shooting incidents and shooting victims seven months in the year … on record”.

Nonetheless, “it’s a terrible thing that’s happened”, she said.

“It’s a terrible shooting,” Tisch added. “There’s no other way to describe it.”

Taste of the City Lounge, located less than a half mile from the historic Brooklyn Museum serves American and Caribbean plates with a full bar, hookah and DJs.


The business opened three years earlier and was the scene of another shooting in November 2024. That earlier case was non-fatal.

The typically Jewish and West Indian area where the shooting occurred has been undergoing rapid gentrification in recent years.

In 2017, a bar advertising its “bullet-ridden” wall caused outrage, with residents accusing the owner of insensitive stereotyping that overlooked the realities and toll of gang violence.

As of Sunday, there had been more than 270 mass shootings in the US this year – or 1.18 a day, according to the nonpartisan Gun Violence Archive. The online resource defines a mass shooting as one in which four or more victims are wounded or killed.

The US’s perennially high rates of such shootings have prompted calls from some in the country for more substantial gun control. But Congress has largely been unable or unwilling to heed those calls.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/17/brooklyn-lounge-shooting
- Sorry if already posted
 
So just to clarify. New York a city and state with some of the strictest gun laws in the country. Could not stop this from happening. But if we pass more laws. The ones only the law abiding follow; it will keep this from happening in the future.
<{katwhu}>
<LikeReally5>
 
So just to clarify. New York a city and state with some of the strictest gun laws in the country. Could not stop this from happening. But if we pass more laws. The ones only the law abiding follow; it will keep this from happening in the future.
<{katwhu}>
<LikeReally5>

According to the statistics I'm seeing, firearm mortality in New York is very low compared to other states.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/firearm_mortality/firearm.htm (2022)

The trend also tends to be strong gun laws = lower gun death rates.

What am I missing? If that's true, and you accept it, I don't get your point. It seems to be "OMG IT CAN STILL HAPPEN", which is kinda retarded.
 
According to the statistics I'm seeing, firearm mortality in New York is very low compared to other states.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/firearm_mortality/firearm.htm (2022)

The trend also tends to be strong gun laws = lower gun death rates.

What am I missing? If that's true, and you accept it, I don't get your point. It seems to be "OMG IT CAN STILL HAPPEN", which is kinda retarded.
It will always still happen when you have no way of removing over 400 million firearms from circulation for one.
I have a lower rate of death via firearm in my state but apparently we are all gonna die from heart disease.


The statistics you cited incorporate suicide as well. That 60+% of the total and include more 70+ year old white males predominantly.
Probably not the main demographic of a NY Hookah bar.

Glad to know you mock special needs in an effort to distract from the fact we already have laws against shooting and killing that didn’t work here. Not to mention the anti gun laws that were also not followed at the city and state level. We should def worry about the solutions to the problem in an effort to squash this by attacking the law abiding gun owner that has gone through more needless infringement of his unalienable right granted by virtue of his/her/{insert prefers pronoun here} birth.
 
It will always still happen when you have no way of removing over 400 million firearms from circulation for one.
I have a lower rate of death via firearm in my state but apparently we are all gonna die from heart disease.

Yes, it will still happen.

That's not a good or clever reason to decry laws that are clearly leading to fewer firearm-related deaths.

A good, clever reason to decry the laws is if they had zero impact or even sent things the other way because "good guys can't protect themselves" or something.

Feel free to evidence that's the case.

The statistics you cited incorporate suicide as well. That 60+% of the total and include more 70+ year old white males predominantly.
Probably not the main demographic of a NY Hookah bar.

Let's not get hung up on every individual isolated incident, and refer to trends.

Fewer people blowing their own heads off seems like another positive.

Glad to know you mock special needs in an effort to distract from the fact we already have laws against shooting and killing that didn’t work here. Not to mention the anti gun laws that were also not followed at the city and state level. We should def worry about the solutions to the problem in an effort to squash this by attacking the law abiding gun owner that has gone through more needless infringement of his unalienable right granted by virtue of his/her/{insert prefers pronoun here} birth.

I appreciate your general feeling towards gun laws is a feeling you definitely have.

Your rationale doesn't seem to hold much water, though, and that's what I'm interested in.

It's fine to "feel" like you don't want to be infringed upon, but I'd be much more interested in a compelling argument that gun laws actively make things worse. Which they don't seem to. They just hurt feelings.
 
Yes, it will still happen.

That's not a good or clever reason to decry laws that are clearly leading to fewer firearm-related deaths.

A good, clever reason to decry the laws is if they had zero impact or even sent things the other way because "good guys can't protect themselves" or something.

Feel free to evidence that's the case.



Let's not get hung up on every individual isolated incident, and refer to trends.

Fewer people blowing their own heads off seems like another positive.



I appreciate your general feeling towards gun laws is a feeling you definitely have.

Your rationale doesn't seem to hold much water, though, and that's what I'm interested in.

It's fine to "feel" like you don't want to be infringed upon, but I'd be much more interested in a compelling argument that gun laws actively make things worse. Which they don't seem to. They just hurt feelings.
I offered my home state as an example.
We don’t underreport crime here and in fact actually prosecute so there’s that. Much more lenient laws than NY in regards to firearms. If you want a link rather than to actually find out how they quantify their data. Than you are exactly the type of uninformed person that Giffords Group, Anytown for Gun Safety, and Moms Demand Action are trying to influence with their misaligned statistics.


Edit* Some large police departments began to report data to the FBI again in 2022, like the Miami-Dade Police Department. But the two largest police agencies in the U.S., the New York Police Department and the Los Angeles Police Department, are still missing in the federal data.
 
I offered my home state as an example.
We don’t underreport crime here and in fact actually prosecute so there’s that. Much more lenient laws than NY in regards to firearms. If you want a link rather than to actually find out how they quantify their data. Than you are exactly the type of uninformed person that Giffords Group, Anytown for Gun Safety, and Moms Demand Action are trying to influence with their misaligned statistics.


How am I supposed to know what your home state is? It's not exactly an example if it's a secret.

I honestly have no idea what point you think you're making, but it's all very generic and kinda silly.

Sorry.
 
How am I supposed to know what your home state is? It's not exactly an example if it's a secret.

I honestly have no idea what point you think you're making, but it's all very generic and kinda silly.

Sorry.
You are deflecting away from criminals not following the laws in the first place. At no point did you even attempt to address this topic from my original post that YOU quoted. I mean you did provide insults and misinformation.

What the fuck exactly are you apologizing for?

Be an adult and stop with the passive aggressive inference.
 
You are deflecting away from criminals not following the laws in the first place. At no point did you even attempt to address this topic from my original post that YOU quoted. I mean you did provide insults and misinformation.

What the fuck exactly are you apologizing for?

Be an adult and stop with the passive aggressive inference.

Deflecting from criminals not following laws? Haha, what?

I'm pointing out that while you mock these laws, they're reducing firearm deaths.

They are working, and you're flapping your arms around trying to find some way to show that they're not.

When they are.

You don't like them, but that's not because they don't work. Once again, it's because they hurt your feelings. Nobody cares about that.
 
Deflecting from criminals not following laws? Haha, what?

I'm pointing out that while you mock these laws, they're reducing firearm deaths.

They are working, and you're flapping your arms around trying to find some way to show that they're not.

When they are.

You don't like them, but that's not because they don't work. Once again, it's because they hurt your feelings. Nobody cares about that.

The IDF is presently calling for the disarmament of Hamas per NPR.
No feelings required to realize that is a ridiculous proposal.
If they just disarm the violence will stop, right?

You don’t seem to have the facilities to be part of such a nuanced discussion on this subject.
We talked about crime stats being suppressed(relevant to discussion and ignored)
We talked about suicide rates being 60% of firearm deaths. (relevant to the discussion and ignored)
How again are we gonna stop suicides and violent crime in a nation with 400 million arms.
You have no ability to wave a magic wand and make them all disappear for anyone but law abiding citizens.

But please go on about my emotional state in a discussion you are incapable or having in an effort to distract away from you being incapable of having the conversation.
 
The IDF is presently calling for the disarmament of Hamas per NPR.
No feelings required to realize that is a ridiculous proposal.
If they just disarm the violence will stop, right?

You don’t seem to have the facilities to be part of such a nuanced discussion on this subject.
We talked about crime stats being suppressed(relevant to discussion and ignored)
We talked about suicide rates being 60% of firearm deaths. (relevant to the discussion and ignored)
How again are we gonna stop suicides and violent crime in a nation with 400 million arms.
You have no ability to wave a magic wand and make them all disappear for anyone but law abiding citizens.

But please go on about my emotional state in a discussion you are incapable or having in an effort to distract away from you being incapable of having the conversation.

We didn't talk about any statistics because you didn't provide any.

You just said "in my state" and provided zero evidence for any of your claims.

You might be right about that, but that's not how a "nuanced" discussion works. You present the data as part of your argument and the other person sees if they agree.

Just saying "trust me bro" doesn't work.

Also, not sure I insulted you. I said laughing at gun laws that appear to be working is pretty retarded. Unless you are an argument and not a human being I'm pretty sure you're not the target of that statement. I think at this point maybe you want to feel insulted.
 
A bunch of Wise Guys get whacked on a night out? Isn't that practically a New York tradition?
 
We didn't talk about any statistics because you didn't provide any.

You just said "in my state" and provided zero evidence for any of your claims.

You might be right about that, but that's not how a "nuanced" discussion works. You present the data as part of your argument and the other person sees if they agree.

Just saying "trust me bro" doesn't work.

Also, not sure I insulted you. I said laughing at gun laws that appear to be working is pretty retarded. Unless you are an argument and not a human being I'm pretty sure you're not the target of that statement. I think at this point maybe you want to feel insulted.
It wouldn’t be nuanced if you just started following the issue here.


Please continue.
 
It wouldn’t be nuanced if you just started following the issue here.


Please continue.
What's funny is he argued on one of his previous accounts that "the CDC couldn't be trusted" after Obama's executive order backfired.

 
According to the statistics I'm seeing, firearm mortality in New York is very low compared to other states.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/firearm_mortality/firearm.htm (2022)

The trend also tends to be strong gun laws = lower gun death rates.

What am I missing? If that's true, and you accept it, I don't get your point. It seems to be "OMG IT CAN STILL HAPPEN", which is kinda retarded.
- We've got a lot of illegal firearms here. Maybe the issue is another thing? Obviously that ease acess to firearms helps those dorks that think hip-hop is real.
 
Back
Top