- Joined
- Dec 30, 2018
- Messages
- 998
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't know the ideological slant of the poster you responded, but years of perusing rightwing forums and blogs has informed me that the rightwing always sees any sort of technological solution or charity that helps the developing world survive as bad because their world-view follows social-darwinism. If something helps 3rd world people survive, the right tends to frown upon it.
It's really a moot point though even if eating insects leads to more available food and consequently more people, because the moral imperative is to help the people alive today, who are starving.
As a matter of philosophical principle I would love to hear an objective explanation for the moral imperative to help people alive today if it makes it worse for everyone alive tomorrow.