Law The Search For The 114th Supreme Court Justice: The Witch-Hunt Against Judge Brett Kavanaugh

Who do you believe?


  • Total voters
    453
It does not prove her account is true. But it makes what she alleges entirely reasonable, based on the reality of American teenage male behavior. Particularly among members of high school athletic teams.

As a track and baseball guy along with being the captain of my wrestling team; I think I qualify as a jock - and neither I nor my teammates; to my knowledge, ever tried to rape anyone.
 
Then get her in there.

And when Ginsburg kicks the bucket(or retires), put in another conservative WOMAN. FUCK the #metoo movement.

If people think this is ugly, just wait and see how the nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will be treated by the mob!

If RBG can some how stay alive until the next Democratic administration before retiring, I can't wait to see how all the partisan fucks in the "Guilty Until Proven Innocent" crowd in this thread gonna backpedal when the other shoe drops. Dumb fuckers are trying to politicize and weaponize #MeToo, without a shred of realization of what a terrible thing is being unleashed on our society when they intentionally give credence to groundless accusations with zero evidence by default, just because of their petty partisan reasons.
 
Last edited:
Or maybe she didn't want to reveal details at the time. Even though its covered by patient confidentiality nonetheless some people might not want to spill everything to their therapist. What matters is discussing the event, not necessarily getting all the details out.

Sure, sure, however, added trouble comes in that her current claims (which she refuses to make under oath, unlike the other parties who have in letters) are contradicted by the therapists notes.

Such as her original account having like, six dudes, bit of a discrepancy, as is about everything about Ford's story to this point.
 
Or maybe she didn't want to reveal details at the time. Even though its covered by patient confidentiality nonetheless some people might not want to spill everything to their therapist. What matters is discussing the event, not necessarily getting all the details out.

It certainly counts as evidence, but obviously if he were explicitly named it would be a much stronger claim.
 
Sure, sure, however, added trouble comes in that her current claims (which she refuses to make under oath, unlike the other parties who have in letters) are contradicted by the therapists notes.

Such as her original account having like, six dudes, bit of a discrepancy, as is about everything about Ford's story to this point.
I haven't followed the story so I can't speak much to the validity of her claims, just saying that its not necessarily a given that she would name him in the therapy session.
It certainly counts as evidence, but obviously if he were explicitly named it would be a much stronger claim.
Fair enough.
 
I read on twitter, let me look further.

EDIT I just read the entire article. That's garbage to say the least lol.

She was so drunk that she had to sit with her lawyer, 3 decades later for 6 days in a row to patch her memory together to the point where she can sort of recall that it was Kavanaugh.

This is really weak stuff. See below:

"After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident."
Sorry I hold my Supreme Court justices to a higher standard. You don't hear stories of Ruth Bader Ginsburg sticking her penis in somebodies face.
 
I haven't followed the story so I can't speak much to the validity of her claims, just saying that its not necessarily a given that she would name him in the therapy session.

Fair enough.

Yes, yes absolutely correct.

It's a bit telling her lead witness was willing to submit a letter of denial under oath, and Mrs. Ford is buying time while any thin gruel can be dredged up to feed the story.

This whole affair stinks.
 
Sorry I hold my Supreme Court justices to a higher standard. You don't hear stories of Ruth Bader Ginsburg sticking her penis in somebodies face.

Actually, didn't a prominent feminist say she would be happy to get on her knees for Bill Clinton due to his protection of abortion? That might not speak for you, but it speaks for a lot of the left at the time, when the proven perpetrator was their man, in their White House.

I'm sure if a lot of frivolous, and in the case of Ford, discredited testimony about Ginsburg surfaced about her highschool days, the left would be eager to find justice. Right?
 
Sorry I hold my Supreme Court justices to a higher standard. You don't hear stories of Ruth Bader Ginsburg sticking her penis in somebodies face.

My Civ Pro professor clerked for her and said she saw her swallow a goldfish at a party one night. Then in her chambers the next night, she purposely didn’t flush the commode with the goldfish in the middle of the log, then called her clerks in and made them look at the brown and gold mess. Just telling you what I heard.

I think that’s worse than a little Irish curse in the face.
 
Yes, yes absolutely correct.

It's a bit telling her lead witness was willing to submit a letter of denial under oath, and Mrs. Ford is buying time while any thin gruel can be dredged up to feed the story.

This whole affair stinks.
It does seem a bit convenient for something like this to pop up at this moment but its not the kind of story that really intrigues me despite the immense relevance it has. I'm just jumping in now and I'll probably end just aggregating the views of the posters I trust ITT as a shortcut.
 
My Civ Pro professor clerked for her and said she saw her swallow a goldfish at a party one night. Then in her chambers the next night, she purposely didn’t flush the commode with the goldfish in the middle of the log, then called her clerks in and made them look at the brown and gold mess. Just telling you what I heard.

I think that’s worse than a little Irish curse in the face.
That's fucking hardcore, an inspiration for women everywhere.
 
It does seem a bit convenient for something like this to pop up at this moment but its not the kind of story that really intrigues me despite the immense relevance it has. I'm just jumping in now and I'll probably end just aggregating the views of the posters I trust ITT as a shortcut.

Well, it did not so much pop up, as it was kept hidden by Feinstien, and then leaked salaciously by Feinstien for the maximum political effect.
 
Grassley not pleased at all by this :


Grassley promises evaluation of new claims against Kavanaugh, hits Dems for withholding info

Sen. Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, late Sunday slammed Senate Democrats for withholding information from the committee regarding new sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

The Iowa Republican said the committee will attempt to evaluate the new claims, but said in a statement “it appears that they [Democrats] are more interested in a political takedown" than “pursing allegations through a bipartisan and professional investigative process.” (no shit, sherlock! :rolleyes: )

His office released the statement after two new allegations emerged against Kavanaugh.

Deborah Rodriguez, 53, a former Yale classmate, said he exposed himself and thrusted his penis in her face during a drunken dormitory party, according to an article in The New Yorker.

Ramirez claimed Kavanaugh exposed himself to her while she was intoxicated during a drinking game in the 1983-84 academic year, when Kavanaugh was a freshman. She also claimed she inadvertently touched Kavanaugh's penis when she pushed him away and says the incident left her "embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated."

The report stated that the magazine had not corroborated that Kavanaugh was at the party in question. An anonymous male classmate said he was told that Kavanaugh had exposed himself to Ramirez within the following days.

Ramirez admitted to the magazine that she does not fully remember the alleged incident because she had been drinking at the time. The magazine also reported that Ramirez spent six days "carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney" before telling the full version of her story.

Kavanaugh says the event “did not happen” and that the allegation is “a smear, plain and simple.”

A White House spokeswoman adds in a second statement that the allegation is “designed to tear down a good man.”

Grassley’s office said the committee’s majority staff learned about the allegations in the magazine’s article. His statement read that Democratic staff were aware of the allegations, but did not inform Republican staffers.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., called the timing of the new allegations “very suspicious.”

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Ct., called on a full FBI investigation and said the committee cannot "in good conscience" vote on the nomination at this point.

Michael Avenatti, the attorney for Stormy Daniels, on Sunday alleged that he had knowledge that Kavanaugh and high school friend Mark Judge targeted women with drugs and alcohol in order to "allow a 'train' of men to subsequently gang rape them."

He did not state the source of his evidence and did not name any alleged victims.

Grassley’s office said it reached out to Avenatti to find out more information about his allegations and requested that he provide any new information.

Avenatti posted a letter he wrote to Mike Davis, the chief counsel on nominations for the Senate Judiciary Committee.

He wrote that he had “significant evidence of multiple house parties” in the 1980s where Kavanaugh, high school friend Mark Judge and others would target women with alcohol and drugs in order to take advantage of them sexually, including gang rapes. He said to expect additional evidence in the coming days.

Avenatti included a list of questions for Senate investigators to ask Kavanaugh, including: "Did you ever attend any house party during which a woman was gang raped or used for sex by multiple men?"

Neither Kavanaugh nor Judge immediately responded to Avenatti's accusations.

Kavanaugh is slated to testify Thursday about the first allegation of sexual assault, dating back from a high school party more than 35 years ago. His accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, is also set to testify.

Kavanaugh, 53, an appellate court judge, has denied Ford's allegation and said he wanted to testify as soon as possible to clear his name.

"This alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. The people who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so," Kavanaugh responded. "This is a smear, plain and simple. I look forward to testifying on Thursday about the truth, and defending my good name--and the reputation for character and integrity I have spent a lifetime building--against these last-minute allegations."

In response to the New Yorker report, Judiciary Committee ranking member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., called on the committee's Republicans to postpone all proceedings related to Kavanaugh's nomination and refer Ramirez's allegation to the FBI.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...kavanaugh-hits-dems-for-withholding-info.html


"Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Ct., called on a full FBI investigation and said the committee cannot "in good conscience" vote on the nomination at this point."

Translation : This is a demand for Trump to force the FBI to investigate this. Like he's going to do the Democrats any fucking favors at this juncture.


BTW, this whole shitshow is on Grassley. If he had just put his foot down when he had the deadline on Friday and not gave any extension, we would've had the vote all done and this whole circus would not have occurred.
 
Well, it did not so much pop up, as it was kept hidden by Feinstien, and then leaked salaciously by Feinstien for the maximum political effect.
You know what they say, never let a good tragedy go to waste.
 
Sorry I hold my Supreme Court justices to a higher standard. You don't hear stories of Ruth Bader Ginsburg sticking her penis in somebodies face.

That's only because she sticks it in the meat grinder instead.
 
Michael Avenatti, the attorney for Stormy Daniels, on Sunday alleged that he had knowledge that Kavanaugh and high school friend Mark Judge targeted women with drugs and alcohol in order to "allow a 'train' of men to subsequently gang rape them."

He did not state the source of his evidence and did not name any alleged victims.

-----------------------------------------------

Can anyone claim that any of this is plausible? Really?
 
Brb, I have a rape club to attend with my Christian fellowship, after that we're going to wave our flagpoles at drunken parties nobody is witness to us attending.
 
Back
Top