The War Room Bet Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL, not a single person agrees with you, you total fool. The dictonary doesn't even agree with you, but don't let that stop you.
You're the one who isn't letting go. You're getting owned and making a fool of yourself. Shut up and go away, as you've been told by multiple people other than me. Cubo De Sangre has told you that, politely, about 5 times. Upaloompa told you that twice in the other thread. The only thing I've ever "admitted to" was that I forgot that I said "half truths" at some point in our now, what month and a half long conversation. You look like a petulant clown. You aren't willing to make your bet about the actual body of the argument, as has been pointed out to you by other posters not involved in the conversation, and I'm not going to get into a bet about semantics, somthing else that others have pointed out to you. So just stop responding and walk away, if that's what you really want to happen.

And I don't need to "salvage" anything. I've won. The fact that you want to have a semantic bet is proof of that. The fact that you're still here trying to get the last word is proof of that. That last part about "salvaging any kind of victory in his eyes" is some of the most epic projection I've ever encountered.

Lol, hey you aren't that dumb, you get the game atleast. Make it about the other person, not the topic being duscussed.

Everyone has been telling us both to shut the fuck up, and that it is stupid.

You sure you want to stand on the ground that I am the one who would wait 3-7 days, and then pick back up the quoting, Mr. Men = soldiers, and liar = half truth?

You know our posts are dated and time stamped right?
 
It will happen and as a result of a huge catalyst that many won't expect or see coming.

"The fall of the Republic never looked so good" - Obama.

Keep falsely believing that all our peace and security will last.

Sig bet?

Edit for everyone else: About Obama declaring a state of emergency and suspending elections. I'd be down for a "I was wrong and stupid" thread, too.
 
Sure, the only problem is, if I win, I won't be here to cash in. But I'll *trust* that you will just copy the links in my Sig.

Because people will need a place to turn to for guidance.

I'm down. One month sound good?
 
I'm down. One month sound good?
Sounds fair.

It will interesting to see who is in the *office* on January 1st.

Of course if I'm right, remember what I said already.

Trust me it will be better for you if I'm wrong, because it gives you more time to work things out brother. Please know I mean you no harm or ill will.
 
Lol, hey you aren't that dumb, you get the game atleast. Make it about the other person, not the topic being duscussed.

Everyone has been telling us both to shut the fuck up

LOL, I didn't read farther than that. I've gotten your little game the whole time, you don't seem to understand that. You aren't fooling anyone. I didn't read past this idiocy. Nobody has told me to shut up. I'm still waiting on that bibliography you promised a month ago.
 
LOL, I didn't read farther than that. I've gotten your little game the whole time, you don't seem to understand that. You aren't fooling anyone. I didn't read past this idiocy. Nobody has told me to shut up. I'm still waiting on that bibliography you promised a month ago.

Of course you cut out the part where I call you on your BS again. But par for the course you refuse to admit that it is you that keeps coming back on multiple occasions a week later picking this BS back up.

You are just too dumb to realize people have been telling us both to shut the fuck up. I'm just too much of an ass to care.
 
Of course you cut out the part where I call you on your BS again. But par for the course you refuse to admit that it is you that keeps coming back on multiple occasions a week later picking this BS back up.

You are just too dumb to realize people have been telling us both to shut the fuck up. I'm just too much of an ass to care.

I went back and read the rest of your last post, so as not to be "called out on my BS". Please show me where exactly I accused you of being the "one who would wait 3-7 days, then pick back up quoting"? I'll also take that biblography and all of the other things you've promised along with it. Thanks.
 
Sig bet?

Edit for everyone else: About Obama declaring a state of emergency and suspending elections. I'd be down for a "I was wrong and stupid" thread, too.

Sure, the only problem is, if I win, I won't be here to cash in. But I'll *trust* that you will just copy the links in my Sig.

Because people will need a place to turn to for guidance.

I'm down. One month sound good?

Sounds fair.

It will interesting to see who is in the *office* on January 1st.

Of course if I'm right, remember what I said already.

Trust me it will be better for you if I'm wrong, because it gives you more time to work things out brother. Please know I mean you no harm or ill will.

It's important to note, inauguration day isn't until later in January so Obama would still be president January 1st.


Format is this
1. The exact statement the bet is premised upon
2. Stance each poster is taking in regards to the statement
3. The date the bet will be decided
4. The reward/punishment for the winner/loser
5. The duration of the reward/punishment

So, is this the official bet?

@Jack V Savage v. @mcveteran81
1. Obama will still be president after inauguration due to suspending the elections and/or declaring a state of emergency
2. mcveteran- True Jack V Savage- False
3. 1/21/2017 (day after inauguration day)
4. Signature bet- Winner picks the loser's signature
5. 1/21/2017-2/20/2017

Mcveteran doesn't technically qualify based on the OP with posts and experience but due to the low activity of bets, this easily can be exempted in this circumstance.

Reply back if you agree on this or I need to tweak anything.
 
It's important to note, inauguration day isn't until later in January so Obama would still be president January 1st.

Format is this
1. The exact statement the bet is premised upon
2. Stance each poster is taking in regards to the statement
3. The date the bet will be decided
4. The reward/punishment for the winner/loser
5. The duration of the reward/punishment

So, is this the official bet?

@Jack V Savage v. @mcveteran81
1. Obama will still be president after inauguration due to suspending the elections and/or declaring a state of emergency
2. mcveteran- True Jack V Savage- False
3. 1/21/2017 (day after inauguration day)
4. Signature bet- Winner picks the loser's signature
5. 1/21/2017-2/20/2017

Mcveteran doesn't technically qualify based on the OP with posts and experience but due to the low activity of bets, this easily can be exempted in this circumstance.

Reply back if you agree on this or I need to tweak anything.

I said "suspending elections," but I would also bet on inauguration, but I would change the wording to Obama doing something to delay/suspend it to avoid something like a storm or some minor mixup with the swearing in that leads to a one-day delay or something. Or make it a week, as anything like that would be cleared up by then.
 
I said "suspending elections," but I would also bet on inauguration, but I would change the wording to Obama doing something to delay/suspend it to avoid something like a storm or some minor mixup with the swearing in that leads to a one-day delay or something. Or make it a week, as anything like that would be cleared up by then.

So the bet would be decided a week after the election occurs?

Format is this
1. The exact statement the bet is premised upon
2. Stance each poster is taking in regards to the statement
3. The date the bet will be decided
4. The reward/punishment for the winner/loser
5. The duration of the reward/punishment

So, is this the official bet?

@Jack V Savage v. @mcveteran81
1. Obama suspends the presidential election, preventing there being an official winner past a week from election day
2. mcveteran- True Jack V Savage- False
3. 11/15/2016 (a week past the official election day)
4. Signature bet- Winner picks the loser's signature
5. 11/16/2016-12/15/2016

I'm really bad at figuring out a clear statement but is this good?
 
So the bet would be decided a week after the election occurs?

Format is this
1. The exact statement the bet is premised upon
2. Stance each poster is taking in regards to the statement
3. The date the bet will be decided
4. The reward/punishment for the winner/loser
5. The duration of the reward/punishment

So, is this the official bet?

@Jack V Savage v. @mcveteran81
1. Obama suspends the presidential election, preventing there being an official winner past a week from election day
2. mcveteran- True Jack V Savage- False
3. 11/15/2016 (a week past the official election day)
4. Signature bet- Winner picks the loser's signature
5. 11/16/2016-12/15/2016

I'm really bad at figuring out a clear statement but is this good?

I'm OK with that (or with the winner of the election taking office within a week of the scheduled inauguration date).

And I don't worry about our differing join dates or whatever because there is 0 chance I'll lose this--I mean that literally.
 
I'm OK with that (or with the winner of the election taking office within a week of the scheduled inauguration date).

And I don't worry about our differing join dates or whatever because there is 0 chance I'll lose this--I mean that literally.

Yea, the join date / number of posts thing was just so I wouldn't have to manage a bunch of new accounts. The thread has been slower than I expected though.

@mcveteran81 , Jack is cool with either proposal posted above (the first one I did is the same except add a week to the statement and when it's decided) so if you could give an okay on either, we can make it official.
 
I went back and read the rest of your last post, so as not to be "called out on my BS". Please show me where exactly I accused you of being the "one who would wait 3-7 days, then pick back up quoting"? I'll also take that biblography and all of the other things you've promised along with it. Thanks.


I thought I was the one that just won't let go, and yet I can show you time and again coming back to post with 3 or more days between posts. Seems you forgot what you posted again. Men =soldiers, lie = half truth. Seems to be a pattern here.
 
Yea, the join date / number of posts thing was just so I wouldn't have to manage a bunch of new accounts. The thread has been slower than I expected though.

@mcveteran81 , Jack is cool with either proposal posted above (the first one I did is the same except add a week to the statement and when it's decided) so if you could give an okay on either, we can make it official.
I'm cool with the signature bet. Let's do it for the inauguration date.

Between both you and Jack, I sincerely hope I lose this bet, as it would mean the extension of mercy and grace.

But it's not up to me. I will be at peace, gladness, and hope regardless of the outcome as I will be Home or still in my temporary *home* for what is worth.
 
Cool. I'll post this which includes the week adjustment mentioned earlier

@Jack V Savage v. @mcveteran81
1. Obama will still be president a week after the scheduled inauguration date due to declaring a state of emergency
2. mcveteran- True Jack V Savage- False
3. 1/27/2017 (week after scheduled inauguration day)
4. Signature bet- Winner picks the loser's signature
5. 1/28/2017-2/27/2017
 
And so the first two sided wager was formed. Truly a great day for the War Room, Sherdog, and America.
 
LOL at that JVS - McJesus bet.

equivalent of standing outside a public basketball court and waiting for kid with crutches to walk by to challenge him to a game of horse.
 
LOL at that JVS - McJesus bet.

equivalent of standing outside a public basketball court and waiting for kid with crutches to walk by to challenge him to a game of horse.

Guilty. That's pretty much what it's for, right? Making an even bet for no money is fun if it's a friend, but that's not the point here. People say something really crazy, and you say, "that's not going to happen." I think it'll be a real learning experience for a lot of people. Another kid on crutches--@glennrod--was backing the guy up.
 
I'd be happy to wager with @ripskater or @glennrod if they'd like to make a similar bet. My dad actually says this stuff a lot so it'd be fun to wager someone over it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top