The War Room Bet Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Healthy shaming in the regular posts are the way to go. @cooks1 brought up (in another thread) how people used to duel. I totally disagree with you (@Lead) about taking account bans/suicide off the table. It makes this kinda penny ante. What happened to in for a penny, in for a pound? You gotta let bros bang so us chiders can mock fuckers into recklessness. The we'll maybe see the real action that gets this train a runnin'.

On that note...fuck you if you don't like some Zeke.







Don't like that one? Try this.





The account ban policy is forum wide so it isn't even a preference of mine, though I do think it's best to keep as many members as possibly in the war room since it's fairly thin already. This thread will still serve its purpose in the long term cause bets and records will be recorded and thus will allow certain users to be praised and or shamed. I just think this initial period is rough because we don't have anything to look at yet, no short term rewards.
 
The account ban policy is forum wide so it isn't even a preference of mine, though I do think it's best to keep as many members as possibly in the war room since it's fairly thin already. This thread will still serve its purpose in the long term cause bets and records will be recorded and thus will allow certain users to be praised and or shamed. I just think this initial period is rough because we don't have anything to look at yet, no short term rewards.

Well if it's "company policy" what can you do? But really we wouldn't necessarily lose members, but rather members would have to start over with new accounts. Isn't it an IP ban that prevents someone from coming back in a new form? No worries though. I'm less passionate about it now that I'm sober. :D
 
Well if it's "company policy" what can you do? But really we wouldn't necessarily lose members, but rather members would have to start over with new accounts. Isn't it an IP ban that prevents someone from coming back in a new form? No worries though. I'm less passionate about it now that I'm sober. :D

That is true. I'm not see why we put it place but I would assume that the higher ups think of someone lost a decent account, they may decide not to come back. Just my guess.

I spent two minutes last night trying to sherdog and failed miserably after a few captain and cokes
 
I spent two minutes last night trying to sherdog and failed miserably after a few captain and cokes

You just need more practice. There's times I've looked at some of my drunk posts that I vaguely remember making and thought...


37607018.jpg




Of course I've no idea how long it took me to get them right. lol.
 
@waiguoren
@m52nickerson

Lets try to apply it to the format so we can make it official.

1. The exact statement the bet is premised upon
2. Stance each poster is taking in regards to the statement
3. The date the bet will be decided
4. The reward/punishment for the winner/loser
5. The duration of the reward/punishment before I will post it.
Once, you both are in agreement, tag me so I can add it.

1. Compare total discrepancies over four swing states (Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina)
gif.latex

where each i indexes one of the states, the p's are the predicted Clinton lead in each state and the a's are the actual Clinton lead in each state.
2. Whoever (Waiguoren using his prediction the day before election day or m52nickeson with 538 for his prediction the day before election day) has the smaller sum (using the equation above) wins.
3. 11/08/2016 (Election day) or slightly after depending on results coming in
4. Signature bet- winner picks losers signature
5. 11/08/2016 (expected based on #3) to 01/20/2016

How's this look? I'm not the best at summarizing these so feel free to propose an adjustment before making this official.
 
Last edited:
You just need more practice. There's times I've looked at some of my drunk posts that I vaguely remember making and thought...


37607018.jpg




Of course I've no idea how long it took me to get them right. lol.

Ha, length definitely should be a factor but the problem is as you mentioned, we usually have no idea. I do find it's far easier to drunk post on my phone compared to a keyboard.
 
It's a common misconception that people remember @VivaRevolution as HendoRuaGOAT. Very similar to the Berenstein Bears phenomena or that my name use to be Lead Salad. My name is Robert Paulson. HendoRuaGOAT's name was Robert Paulson. His name was Robert Paulson
 
@waiguoren
@m52nickerson

Lets try to apply it to the format so we can make it official.



1. Compare total discrepancies over four swing states (Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina)
gif.latex

where each i indexes one of the states, the p's are the predicted Clinton lead in each state and the a's are the actual Clinton lead in each state.
2. Whoever (Waiguoren using his prediction the day before election day or m52nickeson with 538 for his prediction the day before election day) has the smaller sum (using the equation above) wins.
3. 11/08/2016 (Election day) or slightly after depending on results coming in
4. Signature bet- winner picks losers signature
5. 11/08/2016 (expected based on #3) to 01/20/2016

How's this look? I'm not the best at summarizing these so feel free to propose an adjustment before making this official.

Looks good!

@waiguoren you in?
 
@waiguoren
@m52nickerson

Lets try to apply it to the format so we can make it official.



1. Compare total discrepancies over four swing states (Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina)
gif.latex

where each i indexes one of the states, the p's are the predicted Clinton lead in each state and the a's are the actual Clinton lead in each state.
2. Whoever (Waiguoren using his prediction the day before election day or m52nickeson with 538 for his prediction the day before election day) has the smaller sum (using the equation above) wins.
3. 11/08/2016 (Election day) or slightly after depending on results coming in
4. Signature bet- winner picks losers signature
5. 11/08/2016 (expected based on #3) to 01/20/2016

How's this look? I'm not the best at summarizing these so feel free to propose an adjustment before making this official.
I'd like to be able to make my predictions on election day morning. There might be final polls that come out the day before.
 
Over/under on Hilary throwing up in a glass and drinking it?

Over/under on Hilary having a seizure?

I assume this is an open ended offer for a bet that these things will happen. Very well, I accept. Sig for a month ok?

I'll make it even easier - if either of them happen, you win. If neither happen, I win.
 
Let's make it more interesting. Year long sig bet.

I have Trump winning the election, you have Hilary.
That's unrelated to the initial bet, so no reason you can't do both, but you're a 2016 account already on dubs. You get a month at best.
 
I'll make it even easier - if either of them happen, you win. If neither happen, I win.

I think you missed my post in the other thread. Year long sig bet on the election itself. I have Trump, you have Hilary. Deal?
 
Ha ha. So confident. Not worth my time.
If you have an account that isn't an obvious throw-away for trolling, you are welcome to use that for collateral instead. I'm not making a year bet with an account half that old and one hanging chad from e suicide.
 
If you have an account that isn't an obvious throw-away for trolling, you are welcome to use that for collateral instead. I'm not making a year bet with an account half that old and one hanging chad from e suicide.

Bleat bleat little sheep. Ignored.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top