The War Room Bet Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Lead

Upon further consideration...

th

th

th

th

th

th

7535839806_d228cf4565_z.jpg




This last one here seems doubly appropriate. I'd crop it down though.

Does this mean you realized I'm actually just positive balances gimmick account?
 

I think it's likely to be moot, but, yeah, I don't see Clinton reversing on it and it would be practically impossible to change it at this point (I would also say that the actual deal isn't what some opponents were saying it would be). So I'm still game to make some kind of bet, but we'll need more specific language (we can hash it out in PMs and then post the final product here if you want).
 
In spite of me not knowing who that is, absolutely!
Old mod , big bj Penn fan , not a bad guy but could lose his cool , got demodded and then caught a ban , came back ad Ninja please , think he caught another ban a few years ago
 
He does? I thought I had a conversation about her pivoting on that for the primary because of the pressure with the public on trade lately and I thought he agreed she was for it. Maybe I took the lack of mention as confirmation mistakenly. How would you guys determine she supported it or didn't and in what time frame?

To be clear, she never actually reversed a position on it. I don't think anyone can really say that saying that the deal you're tasked with helping negotiate is gonna be good while it's still being negotiated is the same as being for a completed deal. And she's now committed to a position. I think the reasoning behind her opposition is poor--but I think that is generally true of opponents of the deal; it doesn't necessarily make me think it's fake. I would guess that she probably has the same ambivalence about it that pretty much every thinking, knowledgeable person on both sides of the issue does and is emphasizing the negatives after making a decision. I also have issues with claims that her opposition to it is based on political expedience, as it's a pretty obscure issue that most voters with an opinion on support. Obama supports it strongly.
 
Old mod , big bj Penn fan , not a bad guy but could lose his cool , got demodded and then caught a ban , came back ad Ninja please , think he caught another ban a few years ago

Lol, I didn't know he was ninja. That explains why that guy picked fights with me for no reason. I would shit on PB after his ban cause penn fans were unbearable to me at the time. He must've saw those and came at me lol.
 
Lol, I didn't know he was ninja. That explains why that guy picked fights with me for no reason. I would shit on PB after his ban cause penn fans were unbearable to me at the time. He must've saw those and came at me lol.
Lol surprised you didn't pick up on that , he was demodded for saying the " ni66er please " if i recall correctly thus the Ninja please moniker
 
I think it's likely to be moot, but, yeah, I don't see Clinton reversing on it and it would be practically impossible to change it at this point (I would also say that the actual deal isn't what some opponents were saying it would be). So I'm still game to make some kind of bet, but we'll need more specific language (we can hash it out in PMs and then post the final product here if you want).

Sounds good. I'll shoot you a pm this weekend and we can work out the details.
 
@lfd0311

Call out bet. 3 month AV bet.

I believe that I can show 4 quotes from you from the GJ thread, that are not the same statements.

Where you started with a claim that said Howard Zinn said in his book that Columbus brought 1200 soldiers with him, and this made him a liar.

You then were forced to provide the quote, and it says 1200 men. You also then backtracked to saying Zinn was telling half truths.

The mod is the deciding factor in the bet, they will decide whether you are being dishonest, or if my accusation of dishonesty on your part is false.

You will get to provide context to your position in 1 post. I will get a 1 post rebuttal, you will get a closing 1 post argument. The mod must side with one party or the other.
 
@lfd0311

Call out bet. 3 month AV bet.

I believe that I can show 4 quotes from you from the GJ thread, that are not the same statements.

Where you started with a claim that said Howard Zinn said in his book that Columbus brought 1200 soldiers with him, and this made him a liar.

You then were forced to provide the quote, and it says 1200 men. You also then backtracked to saying Zinn was telling half truths.

The mod is the deciding factor in the bet, they will decide whether you are being dishonest, or if my accusation of dishonesty on your part is false.

You will get to provide context to your position in 1 post. I will get a 1 post rebuttal, you will get a closing 1 post argument. The mod must side with one party or the other.

This thread could be an amazing turning point for the WR. some people might be forced into book learning by their pride. (Not referring to HRG or lfd0311)
 
Hillary death bet offer

If Hillary is alive on November 9th I get your avatar for 1 month

If Hillary is dead by November 9th you get my avatar for 1 year

Any takers?
 
Hillary death bet offer

If Hillary is alive on November 9th I get your avatar for 1 month

If Hillary is dead by November 9th you get my avatar for 1 year

Any takers?

I think to avoid confrontation here and expand your chances, you could adjust it to whether Clinton will be a nominee by November 9th. That would be just the same essentially and add if she is sick enough to be taken off the ticket.
 
Hillary is done. Trump just won. Hillary is unfit for office.

Sig bet that Trump doesn't win. Same terms I offered everybody else. You win, I have 'Trump - Making America Great Again' or something similar for a month. I win, you have 'Clinton - stronger together" for a month.
 
Hillary death bet offer

If Hillary is alive on November 9th I get your avatar for 1 month

If Hillary is dead by November 9th you get my avatar for 1 year

Any takers?

I'm game.

How about a sig bet? I can change your sig to anything i want as often as i want for a month and you can humiliate me in my sig for a year.
 
i cant believe he is actually getting you to putzes to buy into that he was always lead -- search buttons exist!!!

upload_2016-9-12_11-36-15.png
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top