- Joined
- Nov 12, 2014
- Messages
- 29,639
- Reaction score
- 3,504
No I wasn't mistakenNo I wasn't harping on specific gravity, I was asking why you said that "1.007 is fine, but utterly irrelevant as there's nothing untoward in that sample anyway". You've misunderstood my orginal question.
I brought up the specific gravity because its a hair's breath away from Nate Diaz's levels from the controversial samples where you were mistaken about the specific gravity levels that NSAC have accepted as valid in another thread.
1.007 Is absolutely fine but utterly irrelevant because there is nothing suspicious whatsoever about that particular urine sample