• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law The Search For The 114th Supreme Court Justice: The Witch-Hunt Against Judge Brett Kavanaugh

Who do you believe?


  • Total voters
    453
I really think the right leaning posters need to be careful. There are a few posters I believe are literally melting down at the moment. You can see it in the recent posts. Could see an attempt to get certain posters banned.

I’m sure the report buttons are smoking. And I wouldn’t doubt it if the Crave Hotline needed an extra operator to be hired

Which is why the Ignore list is my friend. I'm sure there are those whom I already put on there who wish I can see their posts so they can bait me into getting the heave-ho from here.

Too bad, Libertards. As the old saying goes : "Out of sight, Out of mind" <Jaime01>
 
Which is why the Ignore list is my friend. I'm sure there are those whom I already put on there who wish I can see their posts so they can bait me into getting the heave-ho from here.

Too bad, Libertards. As the old saying goes : "Out of sight, Out of mind" <Jaime01>
Hopefully I'm on your ignore list and hopefully for those who have to interact with you in real life you are below age 12.

2 things:

Using the ignore feature is the most beta shit I can think of.

No hyperbole, you're the dumbest individual I've encountered on here in quite some time. This place is filled with idiots for perspective.

Enjoy a fruitful Wednesday.
 
Well, now we know that the FBI investigation on Kavanaugh was a limited scope background investigation and not at the level of truth seeking that a criminal investigation would entail.

The idea we now can put this to bed as if a full investigation was conducted with no findings can be laid to rest.
 
Well, now we know that the FBI investigation on Kavanaugh was a limited scope background investigation and not at the level of truth seeking that a criminal investigation would entail.

The idea we now can put this to bed as if a full investigation was conducted with no findings can be laid to rest.
If she wants a criminal investigation, she should file charges. She only had 36 years to do it.
 
Well, now we know that the FBI investigation on Kavanaugh was a limited scope background investigation and not at the level of truth seeking that a criminal investigation would entail.

The idea we now can put this to bed as if a full investigation was conducted with no findings can be laid to rest.
giphy.gif
 
If she wants a criminal investigation, she should file charges. She only had 36 years to do it.
The statue of limitations passed and that's not what I said at all, so try reading better next time.

The point is no one should assume a full investigation was conducted.
 
The statue of limitations passed and that's not what I said at all, so try reading better next time.

The point is no one should assume a full investigation was conducted.
Oh the irony.
 
You two can taunt all you want, but even if you support Kavanaugh you should still care about the integrity of the court. If I liked him I would welcome a full investigation to clear him so that the court's integrity is intact.
 
The statue of limitations passed and that's not what I said at all, so try reading better next time.

The point is no one should assume a full investigation was conducted.
They interviewed 9 people. There were 6 people there according to Blasey Fraud, seven if she could remember who drove her home, but unfortunately that important detail wasn't "indelibly seared into her hippocampus."
 
Well, now we know that the FBI investigation on Kavanaugh was a limited scope background investigation and not at the level of truth seeking that a criminal investigation would entail.

The idea we now can put this to bed as if a full investigation was conducted with no findings can be laid to rest.

What stone do you think they left unturned? Seems to me that outside of the people she claimed were present, no other details offered by Ford are verifiable.

A criminal investigation would stop right there given that no one Ford claimed was present knows what she's talking about.
 
They interviewed 9 people. There were 6 people there according to Blasey Fraud, seven if she could remember who drove her home, but unfortunately that important detail wasn't "indelibly seared into her hippocampus."
Him and all his other liberal buddies on here assume that Kav is a gang rapist. Just pat him on the head and move on.
 
They interviewed 9 people. There were 6 people there according to Blasey Fraud, seven if she could remember who drove her home, but unfortunately that important detail wasn't "indelibly seared into her hippocampus."
Irrelevant to what I said unless you're arguing they did a full investigation. Is that what you're arguing? Because the head of the FBI who oversaw this disagrees with you.
 
What stone do you think they left unturned? Seems to me that outside of the people she claimed were present, no other details offered by Ford are verifiable.

A criminal investigation would stop right there given that no one Ford claimed was present knows what she's talking about.
No one but the folks who were allowed to review the report know the answer to that question since it was not make public and Wray didn't comment on the details. But Wray did say that it was a limited scope background investigation, which is very different from a criminal investigation.

Seems like an uncontroversial statement that is exactly aligned with what the head of the FBI still gets a reaction from people in itt.
 
What stone do you think they left unturned? Seems to me that outside of the people she claimed were present, no other details offered by Ford are verifiable.

A criminal investigation would stop right there given that no one Ford claimed was present knows what she's talking about.
Even the fucking criminal prosecutor said they had nothing.
 
Irrelevant to what I said unless you're arguing they did a full investigation. Is that what you're arguing? Because the head of the FBI who oversaw this disagrees with you.
Maybe they should put Mueller on the case. He'll find the witch.
 
Maybe they should put Mueller on the case. He'll find the witch.
His hands are full, but he would be great given he found many, many "witches" already. Do you follow that case at all? It's been very fruitful.
 
No one but the folks who were allowed to review the report know the answer to that question since it was not make public and Wray didn't comment on the details. But Wray did say that it was a limited scope background investigation, which is very different from a criminal investigation.

Seems like an uncontroversial statement that is exactly aligned with what the head of the FBI still gets a reaction from people in itt.

No, all of us heard Ford's testimony. That's what investigators had to go on, and they attempted to find any evidence that would corroborate that testimony. They failed to find any after a thorough investigation. In fact, the FBI had more time but simply didn't need it. The only verifiable claims Ford made were related to the 4 people she said were at the alleged party.

You are calling the investigation incomplete. So I'm asking you what was lacking. What stones did they refuse to look under?
 
His hands are full, but he would be great given he found many, many "witches" already. Do you follow that case at all? It's been very fruitful.
Yea he indicted some Russian trolls and Manafort for some shit completely unrelated to Trump. Well worth the ten million in tax dollars we've spent on this clown.
 
Back
Top