- Joined
- May 25, 2002
- Messages
- 8,768
- Reaction score
- 11,057
Bk fighting is more similar to gloved fighting than it is different.
The hands are faster
The hands are more damaging
The hands can slip through smaller holes in the guard.
These are minor changes that are easily adjusted to by a tighter guard. There's no overhaul of techniques.
There's no new angles and openings, only previously existing ones that have a better chance of punches slipping through.
And how exactly are these 'minor changes'?
How is the possibility and danger of guided elbow blocks breaking the hands a 'minor change'?
Or even just of your causal flick jabs now hitting the forehead and damaging the hands, making them not nearly so casual?
Cross guard was a staple of BK but seldom used in modern boxing as an example of different evolution.
Of course there are new angles, just like if I do a WC side palm strike behind your ear it would be coming from an angle your not used to. Incidently no one has confirmed yet if palm strikes are allowed in BK fighting. If they are it strengthens even more the chances of having success one day helping train someone to use WC in BK.
I'm not saying boxing is trash in BK just that you are majorly downplaying the modifications and overhaul needed for it to work effectively.
There is plenty of scope for other arts to come in and prove successful in that format and rival gloved western boxing as a base from the 'swinging-and-miss,brawling, getting busted up and dropped yet barely winning' formula we have seen so far in BK.
For you to higlight BK as an example of boxing supposed efficiency without being heavily modified as a system is a joke looking at their faces after the fights.
"It's normal, everyone who fights will end up with a broken nose, cut up face, semi closed eyes and missing teeth. It doesn't disprove the supremacy and indefatigable destructive and perfectionistism of gloved boxing style in BK. No major change is needed"

Last edited: