Movies The Odyssey (2026) - First Trailer

Is Braveheart inaccurate? Gladiator?
Don't get me wrong, a movie can be inaccurate and good at the same time.

This just looks way too generic.
No matter the period, costumes just don't look high quality. Bland colours are the same as in any gritty action movie. Plus woke cast and miscast Damon. I like Hathaway in her role so far, she looks the part at least, others are really meh.
Overall-not a good look.

Also, I am fully expecting someone to do a remix of the movie with Matt Damon saying "Matt Damon" in retard voice instead all the words.
 
Don't get me wrong, a movie can be inaccurate and good at the same time.

This just looks way too generic.
No matter the period, costumes just don't look high quality. Bland colours are the same as in any gritty action movie. Plus woke cast and miscast Damon. I like Hathaway in her role so far, she looks the part at least, others are really meh.
Overall-not a good look.

Also, I am fully expecting someone to do a remix of the movie with Matt Damon saying "Matt Damon" in retard voice instead all the words.

That's a fair opinion, thanks.
 
I hope the chinese guy got some sick kung fu moves and the black guy got a gat and start blasting some fools
 
The armour looks absolutely atrocious.

Mycenaean armour was fucking awesome, they had so much to choose from. Could at least make it look somewhat plausible. We should be seeing BRONZE in the Bronze Age...

KAR_0259-copy.jpg

KAR_0948-1.jpg

1-4.jpg
 
Is Braveheart inaccurate? Gladiator?

Braveheart is wildly inaccurate. The kilts, the woad, the battle at Stirling Bridge. It's a top 10 movie for me (I must have seen it 5 times in the theater), but it's also the epitome of "inspired by a true story".
 
It looks kind of wrong. Idkw but the helmets look off, almost 3d printed. Cgi seems intrusive and they are going for a Dune theme
 
The armour looks absolutely atrocious.

Mycenaean armour was fucking awesome, they had so much to choose from. Could at least make it look somewhat plausible. We should be seeing BRONZE in the Bronze Age...

KAR_0259-copy.jpg

KAR_0948-1.jpg

1-4.jpg
The amount of effort they'd have to put in to design those costumes wouldn't be worth it trying to impress the average Joe who knows nothing about this anyway, average Joe knows the 300 movie and Rome
 
Braveheart is wildly inaccurate. The kilts, the woad, the battle at Stirling Bridge. It's a top 10 movie for me (I must have seen it 5 times in the theater), but it's also the epitome of "inspired by a true story".

Its really about what parts are inaccurate and how much you can get away with. Just because its inaccurate does it mean Denzel Washington could have played William Wallace?
 
Accurate?

Doesn't it have a cyclops and six headed lochness monster?
<{vega}>
What is this conversation
 
The amount of effort they'd have to put in to design those costumes wouldn't be worth it trying to impress the average Joe who knows nothing about this anyway, average Joe knows the 300 movie and Rome
These are the rare opportunities to inform the average Joe and give him a better representation of Antiquity. Instead it's the same tired tropes - leather armour, wrist bands, bland colors, clownish helmets.

They could had at least went with later Ancient Greek style armour that could had been stamped out easy. Heck, even if they just painted the crappy armour they used bronze it would be more plausible and look better...

6-5.jpg

KAR_9459A.jpg

lumbar-muscular-thorax-00003.jpg
 
If someone made a monster movie set in 2025 Los Angeles and the people were dressed like they're from Saudi Arabia, you wouldn't question the art direction?

I'd certainly giggle.

First thing i giggled about in 300
was the absence of actual Persians.

There is so much trash from Scorsese & Tarantino lately.
Had to turn off the new PTA movie.
Nolan's best is likely behind him.
TV simply surpassed film directors.
Alien:earth looks better than any alien movie
(Vfx wise)

But to digress.

It's obviously funny to see Nolan stir up convo about costumes but still ... cyclops.
Fantasy. The odd only emphasizes the odd.
 
These are the rare opportunities to inform the average Joe and give him a better representation of Antiquity. Instead it's the same tired tropes - leather armour, wrist bands, bland colors, clownish helmets.

They could had at least went with later Ancient Greek style armour that could had been stamped out easy. Heck, even if they just painted the crappy armour they used bronze it would be more plausible and look better...

6-5.jpg

KAR_9459A.jpg

lumbar-muscular-thorax-00003.jpg

Very cool.

I get your point.

Nolan botched it.
 
Its really about what parts are inaccurate and how much you can get away with. Just because its inaccurate does it mean Denzel Washington could have played William Wallace?

Are you saying it could have been even more inaccurate? Of course it could have. They could have given Wallace a katana, or a Colt Peacemaker, or adamantium claws. Sure, it could have been worse, but the initial question was is the movie inaccurate, and the movie was full of inaccuracies.
 


And here we go.

What are your expectations for this? I didn't like Tenet but loved Oppenheimer so i think Nolan's return has already happened, good faith in this film.

My expectation is that it will be a very long film indeed.

Nolan said they shot over 2million feet of film which is an, extraordinariky high amount of celluloid.

Generally l I'm a big fan of Nolan going back to Memento etc
 
Back
Top