• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Economy The most common kind of business in the UK is Buy-to-Let.

Yeah I'm anti further immigration to be clear. But I'm still pro rent control.

You have plenty of properties where the landlord doesn't have a mortgage and they're still pumping up their rental prices as a general rule.

We need to be very careful with legislation like that, there's too many large corporations looking at the profit returns on social housing in general.

Social housing is a very difficult one to get right...
 
The UK is near to top in Europe for the amount of social housing p
The UK is near to top in Europe for the amount of social housing provided already

europe-social-housing.png


It seems something else is going wrong

Yeap the problem is there's shit tons more people than their letting on, that are in the country without our knowledge.
 
Council housing is still provided in the UK

Other countries like nz have tried govt built housing to buy but ended up massively under delivering on the promised number and they ended up not being really any more affordable than what the market built
Yeah it's still provided but tonnes of it got sold off cheap under "right to buy".

There was 5.5million at the peak in the 70s now it's heading towards 3.5million.

Edit - read your other posts now and broadly agree.
 
Yeap the problem is there's shit tons more people than their letting on, that are in the country without our knowledge.

Just the official net migration levels are insane. They peaked at 900k kn 2023, which is almost twice the population of Edinburgh and is just insane. Ignoring all the other issues these people need to live somewhere and the country only has so many homes they can carve up in tiny, shitty flats to put them in. I wonder what will happen when the supply of them runs low.
 
It's slightly below broad rental costs but rental costs are inflated so I don't see an issue with that

My point is that it's still a benefit and people essentially winning a tax payer funded lottery if they stick around long enough is insulting and stupid. I would ok with the right to buy if people weren't able to rent out the property or sell it for a profit
 
My point is that it's still a benefit and people essentially winning a tax payer funded lottery if they stick around long enough is insulting and stupid. I would ok with the right to buy if people weren't able to rent out the property or sell it for a profit

They can't sell for five years I think it is or there's a penalty if they do at least
 
The UK is near to top in Europe for the amount of social housing provided already

europe-social-housing.png


It seems something else is going wrong
A lack of affordable housing is a massive factor as well, developers earn far more building massive estates of big houses and luxury flats.
 
In American english buy-to-let, means purchasing rental property? Like single family homes, or commercial?

This is new?
It's done with all properties, but commercial property is a higher-stakes, higher risk game and there's less of it, so flats and houses predominate. I happened across this video, which is from the US, but relevant. People complain about dead high streets in the UK with many premises long-term vacant, and no doubt landlords preferring to eg ask for £1,000 and wait patiently, like a spider in the corner of its web, than let a premises out quick for £700, is one of the causes. There are a lot of charity shops because they get tax breaks and have volunteers working.



If anyone can't see it tag me and I'll mirror it.
While the net migration figures continue to run so high in the UK the power is going to stay with the landlords. An accommodation shortage and desperate people leads to landlords getting away with much more than they should
Correct. There are millions living in unlawful accommodation, ie not insured, not fire safe, mouldy, overcrowded, not licensed etc. As we've discussed before, all these unlawful immigrants have created a big shadow economy where most of what they do is against the law and off the books.
Yeah I'd agree with that.

After WW2 the UK government set out on a massive programme of affordable "council housing" they built to give families somewhere cheap to live and they basically did it at cost.
Half a million UK houses were destroyed by bombing in WW2, and a bunch more damaged. Many of them were also considered obsolete after the war - for instance David Icke and at least some of the Beatles grew up in houses without inside toilets.
You still provide a lot relative must other countries, especially other English speaking western countries. You should end the idiotic right to buy scheme for council housing and that would help.

On a side note it's a shame a lot of the UKs council housing is ugly as all fuck, the downside of building them as cheap as possible I guess
The UK is near to top in Europe for the amount of social housing provided already

europe-social-housing.png


It seems something else is going wrong
We have one of the highest population densities in the World, never mind Europe, and way higher than the other Anglo countries. I also remember seeing a stat that we have some of the smallest houses/flats in Europe. The Netherlands is quite the anomaly there, wonder what's going on across the sea?
Working or not receiving a council house is a form of benefit
Watch your punctuation.
Yeap the problem is there's shit tons more people than their letting on, that are in the country without our knowledge.
Correct, responded to above.
Just the official net migration levels are insane. They peaked at 900k kn 2023, which is almost twice the population of Edinburgh and is just insane. Ignoring all the other issues these people need to live somewhere and the country only has so many homes they can carve up in tiny, shitty flats to put them in. I wonder what will happen when the supply of them runs low.
They seem to be prepared to concrete over the entire islands. Maybe we'll end up like Easter Island. You can't go anywhere without seeing acres of new housing on the edge of town. Although I still look forward to visiting other areas, the dread of this makes it unpleasant as well.


It is still subsided though, otherwise what is the point?
subsidised
I am surprised it isn't Dentistry.
I wouldn't normally dignify this kind of thing with a response, but you were acidentally kind of right. The nationalised dentistry has been severely overwhelmed, and a lot of people can't get NHS dentistry (the same care by the same staff, but price-capped), or have to wait a long time and/or travel far. I'm on a waiting list for a dentists about 50 miles away which was five years when I joined, for instance.
1. Immigration is good for landlords.
2. Landlords are greedy bastards.
1+2 = 3
3. Landlords should vote left
This is one of those things you know is true without checking, but indeed property developers send the politicans a lot of £, and apparently the Conservatives take the most.

 
Last edited:
It's done with all properties, but commercial property is a higher-stakes, higher risk game and there's less of it, so flats and houses predominate. I happened across this video, which is from the US, but relevant. People complain about dead high streets in the UK with many premises long-term vacant, and no doubt landlords preferring to eg ask for £1,000 and wait patiently, like a spider in the corner of its web, than let a premises out quick for £700, is one of the causes. There are a lot of charity shops because they get tax breaks and have volunteers working.



If anyone can't see it tag me and I'll mirror it.

Correct. There are millions living in unlawful accommodation, ie not insured, not fire safe, mouldy, overcrowded, not licensed etc. As we've discussed before, all these unlawful immigrants have created a big shadow economy where most of what they do is against the law and off the books.

Half a million UK houses were destroyed by bombing in WW2, and a bunch more damaged. Many of them were also considered obsolete after the war - for instance David Icke and at least some of the Beatles grew up in houses without inside toilets.


We have one of the highest population densities in the World, never mind Europe, and way higher than the other Anglo countries. I also remember seeing a stat that we have some of the smallest houses/flats in Europe. The Netherlands is quite the anomaly there, wonder what's going on across the sea?

Watch your punctuation.

Correct, responded to above.

They seem to be prepared to concrete over the entire islands. Maybe we'll end up like Easter Island. You can't go anywhere without seeing acres of new housing on the edge of town. Although I still look forward to visiting other areas, the dread of this makes it unpleasant as well.



subsidised

I wouldn't normally dignify this kind of thing with a response, but you were acidentally kind of right. The nationalised dentistry has been severely overwhelmed, and a lot of people can't get NHS dentistry (the same care by the same staff, but price-capped), or have to wait a long time and/or travel far. I'm on a waiting list for a dentists about 50 miles away which was five years when I joined, for instance.

This is one of those things you know is true without checking, but indeed property developers send the politicans a lot of £, and apparently the Conservatives take the most.



I'm on my phone so you'll have to live with grammar and spelling mistakes
 
Doesn't make them leftists though does it. Not in the way people mean on here anyway.
Well, that's just semantics.
The question is, how do leftists (in the sense of the word you mentioned) feel about making greedy landlords richer while thinking they are voting for a better future?
 
Back
Top