The moment the UFC started going downhill

Lol ur whole assessment is bad. You put it in a monthly context and we get way more fights and better fights within a month any given month.
Also stop being a bigot, you manlet.
LOl I knew the word midget was going to trigger somebody. It's just a word, little man. Don't get too worked up. You are bigger than that!

<Dany07>
 
@HI SCOTT NEWMAN
da6498u-5dd37c32-18da-4973-9158-25c472e303fa.png

You've been watching since UFC 1 - If anyone can tell us :)
I've been watching since the beginning as well and I don't remember who the fuck TS is talking about. I'm old AF...
 
Definitely agree with the ESPN/REEBOK deals when we drastically increased the number of events. The anticipation of events caused excitement to build. Also, the huge increase in number of fighters makes it difficult remember and follow the ascension of each. Makes getting excited difficult because I don't recognize the names of hardly anyone but the main and comain event fighters. Even now, the main event fighters on FN Cards are starting to become unrecognizable to me.
 
I think you people missed the point of my thread. The decline started after Steve Jennum couldn't defend.

This is the obvious and only acceptable answer.
 
Serious reply to a joke thread but to me, the UFC started going downhill in the summer of 2010 when BJ Penn/Edgar and Shogun/Machida had immediate rematches.

While I actually felt the Shogun fight was the level of robbery to warrant the rare exception of there being an immediate rematch (considering there was a real lack of viable title contenders anyway), it set a bad precedent which has plagued the sport for the last 13 years.

Rich Franklin, Matt Hughes, GSP, Randy Couture, even Chuck Liddell.... none of these big name champions got immediate rematches when they lost their titles and their "comeback" fights provided great storylines that helped sell new match-ups while also building up anticipation towards an eventual rematch down the line.

Now big time upsets don't even feel special because you know the UFC is just going to run it back again right after and fans are subjected to the same damn marketing campaign again.

Not only that but the new champion either 1) looks worse against the same opponent lessening their hype, 2) loses the title back forcing a "trilogy" which clogs up the division, or 3) the ex champion loses 2 fights in a row unnecessarily hurting their credibility and possibly even forcing them to change weight classes. Literally no one wins from immediate rematches.

The oversaturated cards (sometimes 3 shit fight nights in 1 weekend), installing a ranking system, the Reebok deal, live bet odds, and "money fight" era have all been hard things to sit through but for me, the downturn all started when the UFC got lazy with their matchmaking and decided to just grind divisions to a halt with immediate rematches.

The reigns of Frankie Edgar (3 opponents in 6 fights), Cain Velasquez (2 opponents in 5 fights), Stipe (2 opponents in 5 fights), Usman (1 non-rematched opponent in 7 title fights), etc all heavily contributed to the entitled rank squatting wasteland we see in modern day where virtually nothing is special or anticipated. It's a damn shame.

TL/DR: Immediate rematches are shit and sparked the downfall of the UFC
 
when the guy only wore one glove, instead of two. if he'd worn two, everything would have been alright.
 
Serious reply to a joke thread but to me, the UFC started going downhill in the summer of 2010 when BJ Penn/Edgar and Shogun/Machida had immediate rematches.
absolutely spot on. i remember having the same reaction to bj / edgar, that it was just going to open up a can of worms. who knew the can would be so big.
 
Nobody alive today on these boards were into MMA in the 90's, even being a TUF noob is too old school for them. Hell, Brock era is too old for them too. They belong to the Colin era.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,170
Messages
58,263,044
Members
175,986
Latest member
BloodandBeer
Back
Top