Wikileaks gave the evidence of bias.Here's the argument:
Tune into CNN.
Studies...LOL.
Bunch of "CNN isn't conforming to my extreme right wing views 24/7...therefore must be biased. Thats why I read Breitbart instead.".
Here it is
Actually stopped reading after that first sentence.
Wikileaks gave the evidence of bias.
Donna Brazile lost her job at CNN because her bias for Clinton was so blatant.
Wikileaks gave the evidence of bias.
Donna Brazile lost her job at CNN because her bias for Clinton was so blatant.
Fox was no friend of Trump, they tried to derail his campaign with the first question of the first primary debate.
(In Trump voice, a parody of "Lyin' Ted, he takes his hand off the bible, then he lies."):Not good enough for lyin' Jack.
Umm...Brietbart is biased to..what exactly is your argument. If I totally admit that Brietbart and Infowars are biased..can you admit CNN is?
In before hacked, altered, fake, Russians, etc.Wikileaks gave the evidence of bias.
Donna Brazile lost her job at CNN because her bias for Clinton was so blatant.
This.
People mistake Fox News for being the conservative news network. Many hosts claim to be conservatives, yet constantly put Establishment Republicans on a pedistal and repeat the talking points of the RNC.
And in both 2012 and 2016, Fox News spurned conservative candidates in favor of moderate Republican Establishment candidates. Like in late 2015 and early 2016, Fox News gave constant positive coverage and easy debate/interview questions to Jeb Bush.
And yes, Trump was the ultimate moderate with many views shared with Democrats. When confronted about these liberal views in a debate, he replied 'Look, I'm a conservative, but with common sense.'
Fox News was in favor of Jeb Bush, then Marco Rubio, and then settled with Trump because the RNC thought Trump would lose to Hillary (Fox News election night before 8pm confirms this).
And only after Trump won has everyone on the right side of the isle have come to Trump to kiss the ring, only after he's won.
I'm not a right winger, and the only argument/study needed would be to actually watch CNN with eyes and a brain to be able to tell that they are very biased towards democrats. I don't even think they have any right winger hosts anymore.See, it's just right-wing cheerleading. Note that there are no arguments made or studies cited. Just pom-pom waving and personal attacks directed toward people who aren't drinking the Kool-Aid.
Ok, someone other than Jack voted "Biased towards Republicans." Fess up, who are you...defend your position.
People keep bringing up Fox News because all of their liberal news sources keep telling them to blame Fox News for all their problems. Blaming Fox News in 2016 is an outdated argument but if some people can't deflect to them or Republicans, they have no argument.
I'm not a right winger, and the only argument/study needed would be to actually watch CNN with eyes and a brain to be able to tell that they are very biased towards democrats. I don't even think they have any right winger hosts anymore.
Just read his post. He can't be serious, surely?