• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

The investigation just GRU by another 12 indictments (Mueller Thread v. 18)

Jonathan Cristol is an imaginary person? Last I checked he was a member of the World Policy Institute (WPI) in New York City and a senior fellow at Bard College's Center for Civic Engagement.


For anyone that's watching








But you know this.

You just like being dishonest
 
For anyone that's watching








But you know this.

You just like being dishonest


I don't follow the guy, so I didn't see the addendum that he added later. How nice of you to assume the worst about me.

Anyway, it was fair to assume that Cristol was calling for military action given the way he worded the original tweet. Nothing dishonest about taking people at face value.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, on the face of it, even his bible thumping supporters will just condone him having an affair with a playboy model while his (3rd) wife was pregnant, and will condone him lying about that affair, and him lying about paying her off leading up to the election, as they have with him doing the same things with Stormy Daniels. The ten commandments on the walls of schools and family values folks have given away the farm when it comes to Trump. How you gonna keep Carl Hungus on the farm after he has seen Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougle?

The issue though, I think, is in regards to if campaign money was used to pay her off and of course, if it was used to pay off Stormy Daniels. This is coming out as part of a criminal investigation into Cohen, and these recording are in possession of the FBI. Also, there is the question as to how the media came into possession of these recordings, if Cohen is leaking them to let Trump know that he is willing to be a stoolie if Trump continues to leave him in the lurch.
Probably the worst aspect of Evangelical support for Trump is that it is founded upon the perceived need to overturn Roe v Wade, to impose their religious beliefs upon a society founded upon the separation of church and state, so they can tell women who are non-believers what they can do with their bodies; and in so doing, they are enabling that heinous piece of infected shit to commit any number of sins against The People.
You_34a0c0_6129977.jpg
 
I don't follow the guy, so I didn't see the addendum that he added later. How nice of you to assume the worst about me.

Anyway, it was fair to assume that Cristol was calling for military action given the way he worded the original tweet. Nothing dishonest about taking people at face value.

No reasonable person thought he was calling for military action with that tweet
 
... funny how it would have ended any other candidate's campaign, in history

Until recent history a decades old sexual encounter between a candidate and another consenting adult of any profession before they even got into politics wouldn’t have been brought up. Could you imagine if JFK was running today? Lordy.
 
Until recent history a decades old sexual encounter between a candidate and another consenting adult of any profession before they even got into politics wouldn’t have been brought up. Could you imagine if JFK was running today? Lordy.
But let's assume a series of circumstances that end in the revelations of hush money and the sordid details surrounding a cover up.
If it gets out, it's over.

Or it used to be.

But this president has lowered a lot of bars as to what kind of man is fit to be POTUS.
 
But let's assume a series of circumstances that end in the revelations of hush money and the sordid details surrounding a cover up.
If it gets out, it's over.

Or it used to be.

But this president has lowered a lot of bars as to what kind of man is fit to be POTUS.

My point was it wouldn’t “get out” because the press wouldn’t cover it even if it did. You think no one knew that Kennedy was railing models?
 
Why attack the writer instead of addressing the claims?

As I wrote, there is a missing link in his narrative.
If the author has a history of pushing his own agenda then his claims lose credibility.
 
The writer lays out alleged facts to construct a narrative. If you won't even attempt to refute the facts he presents, then your responses will continue to be irrelevant.
Do you attempt to refute the facts in an Archie's comic book?
 
My point was it wouldn’t “get out” because the press wouldn’t cover it even if it did. You think no one knew that Kennedy was railing models?
Genie in a bottle. If anybody had anything hard, it would've been printed. There were plenty of papers that hated him, and for that matter, any POTUS.

If anyone had anything better than rumor, we would know this long after his death.
 
Back
Top