The history of immediate rematches (who got one vs who did not)

Aegon Spengler

Steel Belt
@Steel
Joined
Sep 28, 2009
Messages
28,850
Reaction score
18,172
Since Aldo is campaigning for a rematch and there is quite a bit of debate over whether or not he should get one, I felt a thread that provides a bit of historic context would be in order.

Just to get this out of the way: I feel Edgar should probably get the next title shot since Dana promised him he would, but I'd be fine with Aldo getting a rematch too.

I'll only go back as far as Chuck Liddell's title 2007 loss to Rampage and Hughes loss to BJ Penn in 2004, if you want to go back further be my guest, but I feel 8 - 11 years back is far enough to get some context, plus nobody would read this if I went all the way back to UFC 1. I will only use a few cases here because if I went over every title loss that would also take too long.

Here we go:

No Rematch


Chuck Liddell: Not granted immediate rematch
Chuck won the title in 2005 and held it until 2007, so he had a reign of 3 years and was the #1 star in the UFC (and perhaps the sport of MMA). He was not granted an immediate rematch against Jackson, perhaps because it was his second loss to Rampage? In any case, he was forced to work his way back up to a match against Rampage. He never did get a 3rd chance at Rampage. :icon_sad:


Matt Hughes - Not granted immediate rematch:
Lost the title in 2004 to BJ Penn after reigning as champion for about 4 years, rattling off 5 title defenses. He was NOT granted an immediate rematch for the title - part of the problem was the BJ Penn decided to leave the UFC, however, even to get to a shot for the vacant WW title, Hughes had to win a contender fight, then he fought GSP for the vacant strap and won it.

Hughes later lost the title (after holding it for another 3 years and rattling off 4 title defenses, making him the winning-est champ in UFC history at the time) to GSP and had to defeat Chris Lytle before fighting for the title again. I suppose his losses to Penn and GSP were too brutal to be granted rematches?

George Saint Pierre - Not granted immediate rematch:
George lost his title to Matt Serra in 2007 convincingly by KO and had to defeat Koscheck before being given an interm title shot against Hughes, he had to defeat Hughes and Kos to get back to Serra. I suppose GSP's loss was convincing enough to force him to work his way back up.

Brock Lesnar: Not granted immediate rematch

This one is sort of an outlier because Lesnar was a strange case. He was a huge draw on PPV and was a giant star in the sport but had very few matches and lost to Cain convincingly. He was made to work his way back to a title shot and failed to do so.

Matt Serra - Not granted immediate rematch:
The reasons for this are obvious.

Rampage Jackson - Not granted immediate rematch
he lost a very close decision to Forrest after defeating Chuck for the 2nd time and beating Hendo to unify the Pride and UFC LHW championships. It's actually kind of strange they picked Rashad for Forrest's first title defense, all things considered.

Rashad Evans - not granted immediate rematch:
Even though Rashad had been an undefeated champion and pfp kingpin before his loss to Machida, he was not given an immediate rematch, because basically the 'Shadface became a thing.

Lyoto Machida - not granted immediate rematch:
Machida, like Rashad before him, was an undefeated champion and he even had a (questionable) win over Shogun Rua. Shogun flattened Machida so he was not granted a rematch and instead had to fight Rampage Jackson.

Junior Dos Santos - Not granted immediate rematch

Junior lost a UD to Cain and had to beat Mark Hunt to get his rematch.


_________________________________________________________

Cain Velazquez - Not granted immediate rematch after his first title loss. BUT Probably will be getting a rematch after his 2nd title loss.

Cain lost via KO in the first round and had to beat Bigfoot Silva to get his rematch. He is slated to get an instant rematch vs Werdum however, so I put him in the middle. His rematch vs Werdum seems to be a result of the lack of effort the UFC puts into marketing their HW division, and the fact that the HW division is very thin at the moment, as there was no controversy in the way he lost to Werdum.

__________________________________________________________


Yes Rematch



Randy Couture: Granted immediate rematch vs Vitor Belfort

Randy won and lost world titles many times during his career, and only 1 time was given an immediate rematch, which was when he lost the LHW belt to Vitor Belfort via a 1st round eye-cut that resulted in a doctors stoppage. Vitor's glove caught Randy's eye in a weird way during a punch and opened up a bad gash. Randy won his rematch. Randy could also be in the middle because out of 5 career title loses, he was only ever granted 1 immediate rematch.


Andrei Arlovsk: Granted immediate rematch vs Tim Syliva
Andrei lost to big Tim in round 1, after defeating Tim convincingly in the first round of their first encounter. People clamored for a third fight and rubber match so it happened. There was some controversy at the time of Arlovski and Tim's feud, as Frank Mir was actually the title holder but got into a motorcycle accident and created a bit of a mess. Tim and Andrei sorted it out between themselves. Andre lost his immediate rematch. They were both 1 - 1 and each guy had a first round finish over the other when the immediate rematch/rubber match happened.

BJ Penn: Granted immediate rematch against Frankie Edgar
It was believed by many that Penn could have won his first decision against Edgar. I personally believe Penn lost fairly but many people questioned the judging, Penn was also a top star in the UFC and the consensus GOAT at LW when he lost to Edgar. Penn unfortunately lost.

Anderson Silva: Granted immediate rematch against Chris Weidman
Anderson Silva was considered the GOAT of MMA and still holds the record for the most consecutive finishes and the most finishes in title fights. When he lost to Weidman, he was clowning around and acting bizarre then got caught with a clean shot to the face and went down. Anderson lost his rematch.

Frankie Edgar: Granted an immediate rematch against Benson Henderson
Many people believed Frankie could have edged out a decision in their first match and found Benson's won unconvincing. Regardless of your opinion on their first fight, most people believed that it was a close enough fight to warrant a rematch. Edgar had just come off his fantastic finish of Maynard, completing their trilogy of epic fights, so Edgar was quite popular. The rematch between Benson and Edgar was even closer than their first fight; however, Frankie lost and failed to regain his LW title belt.

Renan Barão: Granted an immediate rematch but had to pull out of his fight due to a bad weight cut.
He was given an immediate rematch but was unable to make weight and was hospitalized. His rematch was justified on the grounds that his previous fight had gone 5 rounds, he was a top p4p fighter and finisher, and he was the clear cut #2 man in his division behind the champion.


Ronda Rousey: Slated to be granted an immediate rematch against Holly Holm
Ronda is the face of WMMA. Her loss was spectacular and convincing, but she is one of the biggest stars in the history of the sport and kept the UFC going in the mainstream after it's PPV-King champions GSP and Anderson lost their belts.



The conclusions we can draw from history




Immediate rematches are given out sporadically and seem to have little to do with merit or star power, and do genuinely have a history of being given to fighters based on the context of their loss, except in the case of Ronda Rousey. GSP, Lesnar and Chuck were the 3 highest grossing PPV kings in MMA history and none of those three were given immediate rematches based on their star power, unlike Rousey. She seems to be the only fighter in history to fit that bill regardless of the fact that she lost cleanly, convincingly and spectacularly.

If we use history as our guide, Aldo will not get an instant rematch against McGregor. It just ain't gonna happen because he is not a star at the level of Rousey and lost convincingly: AND THAT COULD BE A GOOD THING for Aldo fans, because in most instances when an immediate rematch was given to a fighter, that fighter actually lost their rematch. Fighting contenders and working their way back up seems to help former champions more than it hurts them. Randy is an exception but that was a very odd situation.
 
Would be perhaps more interesting to see a table including all champs who lost their belt.
Fighter; number of defences; method of defeat; immediate rematch Y/N
 
And how many of those fighters you listed went on a 10 year win streak, defended the title like 10 times, and were on everyone's top 3 p4p lists for the past 5 years?
 
And how many of those fighters you listed went on a 10 year win streak, defended the title like 10 times, and were on everyone's top 3 p4p lists for the past 5 years?

None, but Hughes was ranked either #1 pfp or top 3 by everyone for around 4 years, he had the most title defenses in UFC history at the point where he lost his belt, he even had a win vs the guy who beat him AND he was one of the three top stars in the UFC and the sport in general and they still didn't give him an immediate rematch because of his embarrassing loss to GSP - a loss that wasn't even close to as embarrassing as Aldo's loss to Conor.

2zjfhci.png
[/IMG]

Would be perhaps more interesting to see a table including all champs who lost their belt.
Fighter; number of defences; method of defeat; immediate rematch Y/N

That exists in a manner of speaking, right here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UFC_champions

but I felt providing some specific examples and the context of the situation where a rematch was or was not granted would be the better route.
 
I think aldo deserves the rematch but I think it will be better if he takes a tune up fight first.
 
I think Aldo deserves a rematch but I wanna see McGoober/Edgar and give Aldo another fight in the meantime
 
But none of those fighters held the belt as long as Aldo or defended it as many times.
 
Matt Hughes - Not granted immediate rematch:
Lost the title in 2004 to BJ Penn after reigning as champion for about 4 years, rattling off 5 title defenses. He was NOT granted an immediate rematch for the title - part of the problem was the BJ Penn decided to leave the UFC, however, even to get to a shot for the vacant WW title, Hughes had to win a contender fight, then he fought GSP for the vacant strap and won it.

George Saint Pierre - Not granted immediate rematch:
George lost his title to Matt Serra in 2007 convincingly by KO and had to defeat Koscheck before being given an interm title shot against Hughes, he had to defeat Hughes and Kos to get back to Serra. I suppose GSP's loss was convincing enough to force him to work his way back up.

_________________________________________________________

these are both cases where the new champ disappeared or had a long layoff
gsp was serras first attempt at a defense.​
 
these are both cases where the new champ disappeared or had a long layoff
gsp was serras first attempt at a defense.

Yes, but Hughes was still made to fight a contender fight before getting a shot at the WW belt that BJ Penn left vacant.

GSP lost his title in April and fought vs Koscheck in August, Serra was slated to fight Hughes and NOT GSP, GSP was forced to fight Kos.

Yes, Serra was sidelined but he was given a chance to coach TUF instead of granting GSP an immediate rematch; and Serra injured his back during the filming of TUF, GSP could have been given a rematch vs Serra but it was decided he should fight Kos instead even before Serra's injury, and Serra was slated to fight Hughes. GSP replaced the injured Serra for the Hughes fight and won the interm belt off Hughes.
 
The matchups that warranted it: Penn vs Edgar, Shogun vs Machida

The matchups that didn't: CAIN against WERDUM (biggest joke of all time), Anderson vs Weidman, Ronda vs Holm, Edgar vs Henderson, Barao vs Dillashaw (when it was booked), Aldo vs Mcgregor

Immediate rematches should virtually never happen imo. A major champion coming back from a loss (i.e. Ronda) is going to draw buys regardless of who the opponent is because there is a story to it; I see no reason why the UFC should risk having champions lose 2 straight just to make a quick buck. An anticipated rematch built up over time will draw much more than an immediate rematch and it gives the UFC much more options in terms of matchmaking.

I also disagree with Jones getting an immediate shot upon his return. Not because he "doesn't deserve it" (whatever that means; mma is not a legitimate sport in the first place), but because his return fight will be a huge deal regardless of who he is fighting so why not have him fight someone like OSP who he will destroy and create even more hype for a Cormier rematch? Jones was champion for a very long time and had cleaned out the division - why is the UFC rushing so fast to put the belt back on him? Have Cormier crush Bader and Jones crush a can/fringe contender, and then book the rematch? They fought less than a year ago after all.


This is a lot more practical matchmaking like we used to see in MMA instead of constantly having top contenders face each other which burns out fan interest. Hot shotting is near sighted and is the main reason why mma is a lot less popular than it used to be; the UFC struggles immensely to build up to matchups which is why there are very few stars nowadays
 
you forgot renan barrao who was given immediate rematch. He had to pull out last minute the week of the fight but the basis of this thread is champs who lost and were given the immediate rematch opportunity which he was.
 
you forgot renan barrao who was given immediate rematch. He had to pull out last minute the week of the fight but the basis of this thread is champs who lost and were given the immediate rematch opportunity which he was.

I also noted I would not be including every instance and would only use a few examples - but thank you for adding more info to the thread, it's appreciated, and I will add Barrao to the OP.
 
love how the YES side is missing Cain/werdum to make the nos seem bigger
 
love how the YES side is missing Cain/werdum to make the nos seem bigger

I put him in the middle because he is a yes and a no. He was not granted an immediate rematch, and also is going to be granted one.

Believe me, if I wanted to make the no side bigger, I could. I added Randy to the yes side even though he was only ever given one immediate title rematch in a career where he had 5 title loses.
 
Good thread TS.

Agree that Liddell and Hughes SHOULD have been granted immediate rematches by the current standards of giving a dominant champ a mulligan. GSP lost on his first defense and was not a dominant champ at the time.

But in the past 7 years or so, I don't think there's been a dominant champ that HASN'T gotten an immediate rematch. Benson is the only possible exception, and he lost convincingly and had 2 SD's during his run. Barao, Ronda and Anderson all got rematches, as you point out.

Aldo has been as dominant a champ as it gets. I won't say he DESERVES a rematch because the UFC is a business, but by the standards they've applied recently, he certainly SHOULD get one.
 
I got two you can knock off your list. Rampage ko'd Liddel for the 2nd time, going 2-0 against him. So a rematch there would have been ridiculous. Serra took a year off after the GSP upset (injury I believe) making an immediate rematch impossible, so they made an interim belt. Serra ended up fighting GSP twice in a row either way.
 
And how many of those fighters you listed went on a 10 year win streak, defended the title like 10 times, and were on everyone's top 3 p4p lists for the past 5 years?

None of them got flatlined in 13 seconds by a guy who said he would do that either.
 
Good thread TS.

Agree that Liddell and Hughes SHOULD have been granted immediate rematches by the current standards of giving a dominant champ a mulligan. GSP lost on his first defense and was not a dominant champ at the time.

But in the past 7 years or so, I don't think there's been a dominant champ that HASN'T gotten an immediate rematch. Benson is the only possible exception, and he lost convincingly and had 2 SD's during his run. Barao, Ronda and Anderson all got rematches, as you point out.

Aldo has been as dominant a champ as it gets. I won't say he DESERVES a rematch because the UFC is a business, but by the standards they've applied recently, he certainly SHOULD get one.

I tend to agree with you, and I'd be fine with it if he got one, but I don't think he will. They can swing either way and I believe the UFC has zero interest in getting Aldo back on the throne - A) because he pulls out of title fights B) because he doesn't speak English and won't work at fight promotion C) because he's dangerous to McGregor who is their main man right now and D) because they promised a fight to Frankie Edgar.

I got two you can knock off your list. Rampage ko'd Liddel for the 2nd time, going 2-0 against him. So a rematch there would have been ridiculous. Serra took a year off after the GSP upset (injury I believe) making an immediate rematch impossible, so they made an interim belt. Serra ended up fighting GSP twice in a row either way.

Serra was scheduled to fight Matt Hughes in his first title defense but got injured while filming TUF. Re: Rampage, I pointed out the reason Chuck didn't get his immediate title shot, so we agree on that one.

Did rua and Machida have two fights in a row?

Yes, but like Johnny Hendricks, that was the rare occasion where the champ won and then had to fight the same guy in the very next fight, those are examples of contenders who lost getting instant rematches, rather than champions who lost getting instant rematches.
 
Back
Top