G
Guestx
Guest
It isn't Predator or The Running Man, and certainly not The Terminator. But I think it greatly surpasses what his contemporaries and peers were doing around that time. Van Damme and Seagal had already entered the territory they now occupy. Stallone was starring in shit like D-Tox and Avenging Angelo, which didn't even get serious theatrical releases.
You're right, I think we'll forever disagree about the objective quality of Collateral Damage. I think it's...solid enough, and a little better than Eraser, not out of place next to the 6th Day, better than Raw Deal, and I'd rather rewatch it than Terminator 3. Nothing to write home about, but not a black mark on his record.
Well like I just was telling moreorless, I think Eraser was better. I'd also rather re-watch T3, which I actually don't think is a terrible movie, than to have to sit through Collateral Damage again. I don't remember much about The 6th Day, but I do remember thinking that it also was disappointing and pretty shitty. End of Days was probably the best movie he made during that phase of his career.
I would agree with you that he was doing better than Sly, Van Damme and Seagal, though. Then again, that's not saying a whole hell of a lot. ALL of those dudes' careers was on life support around that time.

