It has to be more than that. Every fight, his strikes and combo look faster, stronger, and crisper. Yet he gets beat by guys who slug it out, wtf. He didn't get KOd in the Johnson or Ferguson fights, he just lost.Barboza's problem is his chin. Some more resistance he'd be champion by now, also gets a lot of fights in short notice and even though he shows up in good shape, a full camp barboza is more dangerous.
You must not know what you're watching when you watch MMA.
And bookies didn't analyze anything, lines move according to how people bet. More morons like you bet on Conor thinking the fight was a fluke, so it moves the line making him the favorite. Please, implore your buddies to bet on Conor as well. And bet BIG. The more the line shifts in Conor's favor, the more money I'll make.
To be fair, he was beating Ferguson. He won the first even after getting fouled and not getting five to recover.It has to be more than that. Every fight, his strikes and combo look faster, stronger, and crisper. Yet he gets beat by guys who slug it out, wtf. He didn't get KOd in the Johnson or Ferguson fights, he just lost.
This.Tough to disagree with any of that. The only thing I'd say is that it's probably unrealistic to expect McGregor to completely reinvent his striking style in a few months (and even if could, he likely has too much pride to do so).
He has to much to fix in a little amount of timeTough to disagree with any of that. The only thing I'd say is that it's probably unrealistic to expect McGregor to completely reinvent his striking style in a few months (and even if could, he likely has too much pride to do so).
You must not know what you're watching when you watch MMA.
And bookies didn't analyze anything, lines move according to how people bet.
I noticed.He says Conor starts out with good footwork like against Aldo, but once he exchanges he forgets to get out of range as the fight goes on and his footwork becomes non-existent.
This is a very good point that I've seen a few people make but they usually get shouted down by the "master of movement" crowd.
Haven't heard anyone say Conor is suddenly shit. Nate is just a bad matchup for him. He can eat Conor's left, and he has better boxing, cardio, and chin.You would think Nate is undefeated given the talk of battle plans need to be drawn up to beat him. Lennox Lewis lost to Oliver McCall and Rahman despite him being the far superior fighter. Shit happens. There is such a thing as a bad night. Lewis annihilated them in his rematches and that's why the bookies have Conor at short odds for his rematch. Oddsmakers aren't swayed by irrational hatred for Conor like the Natehuggers are. They have coldly analyzed the rematch and have come to the conclusion that Nate isn't suddenly amazing and Conor isn't suddenly shit.
It is shite. Let me tell you, no one with an 8 inch reach advantage should be hit as many times as Conor was against Chad. Especially the same punch over and over.
Guys like Barboza have to fear the takedown.I agree, but he's losing against sluggish guys like Michael Johnson and Ferguson. So how important is crisp technique in MMA?
I'm the son of a bookie. I've worked in his betting shop for many, many years. You are clueless on the matter. The lines are not set by the public, they are later influenced by the public yes, though typically not to any great extent, not that it would make a difference if they did, as I clearly said Conor OPENED with short odds, and bookies aren't in the habit of starting the line with cluelessly generous odds for the public to take advantage of. Sports are analyzed to a degree you would not believe before lines open. They get it right from the beginning. In summary, oddsmakers set the lines, the clue is in their title.
I agree, but he's losing against sluggish guys like Michael Johnson and Ferguson. So how important is crisp technique in MMA?