Suppressed technology. Fact or fiction?

Powerful people have oil and gas investments, so they don't want any new clean energy. What's up Joe Manchin?

From the tic tac UFO, someone has some sort of antigravity propulsion.
 
BearGrounds said:
BTW, planned obsolescence is a concept that sort of ties into this thread.

Making tech less effective and designed for eventual failure so as to ensure return consumerism.

xplannedobsolescence.jpg.pagespeed.ic.vAoQr378K9.jpg


Click to expand...

Yep. Came here to say light bulbs. They can make them last a lifetime. But the manufacturers collided a long time ago to make sure they wouldn’t.

Also, the gay bomb. I’m not saying it was suppressed necessarily. But the military did research in attempt to develop a bomb that would make enemy combatants gay, and start having gay sex with each other, to distract them or make them less effective. It would have been hilarious had it worked.
 
BearGrounds said:
Are you saying that you don't believe the video?

Also, <GinJuice>
Click to expand...
So you’re saying they suppressed the information about how where fossil fuels really come from, or how they’re created, including a conspiracy involving Wikipedia, Webster’s dictionary, encyclopedias, etc., but then didn’t shut this guy up for some reason? They didn’t remove this video from YouTube because YouTube is fighting the good fight, or what?
 
Jack Reacheround said:
Yep. Came here to say light bulbs. They can make them last a lifetime. But the manufacturers collided a long time ago to make sure they wouldn’t.

Also, the gay bomb. I’m not saying it was suppressed necessarily. But the military did research in attempt to develop a bomb that would make enemy combatants gay, and start having gay sex with each other, to distract them or make them less effective. It would have been hilarious
Click to expand...
Sexyyama is this forum's gay bomb
 
Jack Reacheround said:
So you’re saying they suppressed the information about how where fossil fuels really come from, or how they’re created, including a conspiracy involving Wikipedia, Webster’s dictionary, encyclopedias, etc., but then didn’t shut this guy up for some reason? They didn’t remove this video from YouTube because YouTube is fighting the good fight, or what?
Click to expand...

Nobody will believe him anyway.

<seedat>
 
This isn't conspiracy theory this is conspiracy FACT.

There is a documentary called "Who Killed The Electric Car?" which covers how electric car tech was available DECADES before the recent appearances of Prius and Tesla.


 
BearGrounds said:
Well, they certainly didn't us the term "fossil" because that's where oil comes from.
Click to expand...
That’s because you think of fossils as being fully shaped dinosaur skeletons. They aren’t. They’re the carbon, and other basic elements, of organic matter broken down.
 
Probably a lot less than you think

Most tech being suppressed is proven and known to the public.
It's just boring old lobbying and regulations.
No sexy super secret FTL travel tech or interdimensional portals.
 
Jack Reacheround said:
That’s because you think of fossils as being fully shaped dinosaur skeletons. They aren’t. They’re the carbon, and other basic elements, of organic matter broken down.
Click to expand...

That misconception is by design, that's the point. It makes people think of the product as being more scarce than it actually is.
 
Last edited:
BearGrounds said:
They're still toying with his ideas. Check out the video below.

Click to expand...


There's still not a lot of evidence for the narrative that he was supressed by some nefarious forces that others weren't subject to.

In a nutshell, he was an inventor who failed in his goal to create some sort of world changing invention which would make him rich like some of his peers eg Edison and Marconi.

AC lost a format war to DC and he ended up selling the patent, making him independently rich enough to pursue being an inventor full time. He then spent his entire life doing all sorts of amazing science and experimentation, which he was allowed to do because America... however he never really came up with anything that had commercial applications during his lifetime. Radio control was considered a novelty, wireless charging only took off relatively recently, and we still don't have wireless electricity beaming across the Atlantic. That's the reason people are still toying with his ideas, because many of them were decades or even centuries ahead of his time.

His accomplishments were recognised at the time as well, he communicated with lots of educational establishments and they all agreed he was an absolute genius. I think the nature of his independence is one of the reasons his legacy wasn't celebrated as much it could have been. Compared to scientists did their work within a university, he had nobody to promote his legacy after his death.
 
jimbob27 said:
There's still not a lot of evidence for the narrative that he was supressed by some nefarious forces that others weren't subject to.

In a nutshell, he was an inventor who failed in his goal to create some sort of world changing invention which would make him rich like some of his peers eg Edison and Marconi.

AC lost a format war to DC and he ended up selling the patent, making him independently rich enough to pursue being an inventor full time. He then spent his entire life doing all sorts of amazing science and experimentation, which he was allowed to do because America... however he never really came up with anything that had commercial applications during his lifetime. Radio control was considered a novelty, wireless charging only took off relatively recently, and we still don't have wireless electricity beaming across the Atlantic. That's the reason people are still toying with his ideas, because many of them were decades or even centuries ahead of his time.

His accomplishments were recognised at the time as well, he communicated with lots of educational establishments and they all agreed he was an absolute genius. I think the nature of his independence is one of the reasons his legacy wasn't celebrated as much it could have been. Compared to scientists did their work within a university, he had nobody to promote his legacy after his death.
Click to expand...

He failed because his funding was pulled by Morgan.

Do you think that his labs were raided by government agencies after his death for benign reasons?
 
BearGrounds said:
That misconception is by design, that's the point. It makes people think of the product as being more scarce than it actually is.
Click to expand...
Maybe that was the intention, but I never thought fossil fuels came from dinosaur fossils. I don’t know anyone who did.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,726
Messages
58,314,485
Members
175,997
Latest member
Fitboy485

Share this page

Back
Top