• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Summery in March (SCO v 31)

HereticBD said:
Yep, and people get exonerated by the investigation, if they are found not to have committed a crime.
Click to expand...
We haven't even seen a full sentence form the Mueller report yet. Congress is the arbiter of Presidential misdeeds.
 
ocean size said:
It's difficult to mesh these two things:

"[Mueller setting out] evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the special counsel views as ‘difficult issues’ of law and fact concerning whether the president’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.”

"[Mueller's report] absolutely did [exonerate Trump]".

A reasonable interpretation of the former is while there is evidence consistent with obstruction, Mueller noted difficult issues of law might include things like when exercise of executive power overlaps with what could be evidence of corrupt intent. Not sure what the difficult issues of fact would be, but I'd be curious to see them. However it's seems odd to parse that as an absolute exoneration when he is fully capable of writing much less equivocally, like when he addresses collusion.
Click to expand...



Except in reality, Meuller made a decision. It was to leave the judgment up to his boss. His boss, along with RR and other legal experts determined there was none.


Have a problem with that? Blame Meuller for not making the decision himself.
 
lilelvis said:
Yep, then they are indicted, or not.
Click to expand...
DOJ policy is not to indict a sitting President. And there was no way that Trump's flunky was going to do it under any circumstances. He said as much in the memo he wrote to get the job in the first place.
 
Did anyone actually expect posters to admit they have been wrong for the last 2 years? Admit that they lapped up the media propaganda?

I didn't expect it
 
bobgeese said:
Btw, this is your typical post in response to me.


“Is the investigation over, or is it closing in on Trump?”
https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/...on-thread-v-22.3820567/page-15#post-144359927


<36><36><36>



So by all means, keep posting your literal meaningless point. It only serves to embarrass yourself further.
Click to expand...

Why won't you address a single thing I've said and asked you in my last few posts to you? You can't stop trolling, it's all you do here. You expose yourself as a career troll when you do this.

So go on, I dare you. Address something I've said or asked you in these posts. You can't do it, you can only troll.
 
Check out this guy's Robert Mueller tattoo!
What a genius


uGnAgw8oBM_QcXKMGEdvu-XBODtczgpzeaKl781lq0w.jpg
 
BarryDillon said:
We haven't even seen a full sentence form the Mueller report yet.
Click to expand...

Your opinion doesn't matter. Much like it wouldn't matter in any investigation. The DOJ decides. The head of the DOJ has decided that there was nothing in Mueller's report to suggest any wrongdoing by Trump. Mueller has not disputed any of those conclusions either.

Now go bathe in your tears.
 
BarryDillon said:
DOJ policy is not to indict a sitting President. And there was no way that Trump's flunky was going to do it under any circumstances. He said as much in the memo he wrote to get the job in the first place.
Click to expand...
If you dig deeper in to your own ass, you still won’t find anything.

Let’s see if mueller recommends an indictment. I’m pretty sure he hasn’t. And that was his job..
 
computer fogie said:
Why won't you address a single thing I've said and asked you in my last few posts to you? You can't stop trolling, it's all you do here. You expose yourself as a career troll when you do this.

So go on, I dare you. Address something I've said or asked you in these posts. You can't do it, you can only troll.
Click to expand...


I’ve addressed it multiple times.

You repeating

“Meuller didn’t exonerate him”

Is literally meaningless. That was his decision, and his boss along with RR and legal experts (which again you were wrong in claiming it was Barr’s decision, I’ve noted it could have been you using a bad choice of words) decided there was none.



Now, you answer my question.


Why do you keep repeating it? It means literally nothing.
 
 
HereticBD said:
Your opinion doesn't matter. Much like it wouldn't matter in any investigation. The DOJ decides. The head of the DOJ has decided that there was nothing in Mueller's report to suggest any wrongdoing by Trump. Mueller has not disputed any of those conclusions either...
Click to expand...

I agree, it really doesn't matter what anyone has for an opinion. Mueller's report, no matter what is in it, has been deemed by Barr to be no threat to Trump. We can agree or disagree, but it's a done deal.

Whether or not Mueller would speak out against Barr if he disagreed, though, is pure speculation.
 
BarryDillon said:
DOJ policy is not to indict a sitting President. And there was no way that Trump's flunky was going to do it under any circumstances. He said as much in the memo he wrote to get the job in the first place.
Click to expand...

The memo actually said it was written without regard to the DOJ's policy against indicting sitting Presidents. In other words, they could not have indicted Trump even if he were not President.
 
sickc0d3r said:
This thread has been hilarious. Buncha Trump fans hoping people will "melt down", not getting anything like that from the normal people, and then pretending it happened anyway. Must be a weekday in the War Room.
Click to expand...
lol

It has been a really strange thread because of that. Been sniped at a couple times myself, implying that I'm mad about the news or whatever, but that's not the case. I think the event has settled down enough that these threads could stand to be moderated for shitposting/memeposting and derails/callouts.
 
computer fogie said:
I agree, it really doesn't matter what anyone has for an opinion. Mueller's report, no matter what is in it, has been deemed by Barr to be no threat to Trump. We can agree or disagree, but it's a done deal.

Whether or not Mueller would speak out against Barr if he disagreed, though, is pure speculation.
Click to expand...



Again, you’re either being very careless with your language, or you’re deliberately ignoring the fact that the decision was not made by Barr alone.
 
bobgeese said:
Except in reality, Meuller made a decision. It was to leave the judgment up to his boss. His boss, along with RR and other legal experts determined there was none.


Have a problem with that? Blame Meuller for not making the decision himself.
Click to expand...
I don't have a problem with it since I am not insisting Mueller's report exonerated Trump.

Would still like to see this evidence for and against.
 
computer fogie said:
Whether or not Mueller would speak out against Barr if he disagreed, though, is pure speculation.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure if Barr grossly mischaracterized Mueller's findings to the point of completely fabricating a conclusion that Mueller never came to, you'd have heard about it.

Now, just for one solid minute, I want you to think about just how desperate you are not to believe the official findings, and how far you're reaching to think some shady shit is going on...and then slap yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,271,190
Messages
57,704,491
Members
175,813
Latest member
Omidullah81

Share this page

Back
Top