Summery in March (SCO v 31)

[JamesRussler]

I'm just waiting for the frenzy to die off when the report is actually released and we see what Mueller actually found that explains ""doesn't exonerate him".

You’re going to be disappointed again. Mueller actually did exonerate Trump on the collusion allegation. He did not reach a conclusion on the obstruction question, but Barr did: no obstruction. You are grasping at straws. It will only prolong your suffering.

 

[kpt018]

I'm glad you feel pleased to be tagged.
I felt that given how outspoken you were about Trump getting locked up, you might want to say your piece on here. It's been awful quiet from the other side here. And that's what makes this forum entertaining- it's the debate and following crow meals.

Quote the comment you're referring to and I'll gladly talk about it. When did I say Trump is getting locked up and for what?

 

[splendica]

The irony is the smartest guys in the room sneered at anyone that would watch fox as low iq info consumers as they themselves swallowed unfiltered delusion from any orifice it was being spewed.

 

[Andy Capp]

You’re going to be disappointed again. Mueller actually did exonerate Trump on the collusion allegation. He did not reach a conclusion on the obstruction question, but Barr did: no obstruction. You are grasping at straws. It will only prolong your suffering.

As usual you are all misinterpreting the result for the sake of trolling. I'll wait for the report and the results of the other criminal investigations. You can crow all you want. Thinking it's great that your President, his campaign, and his administration, were all unwitting puppets of the Russians is a good thing, is as sad as electing that criminal POS in the first place, and I don't think it's necessarily better than Trump being a treasonous Putin bottom bitch.

The narrative that the investigation shouldn't have occurred because there was no fool proof case for conspiracy is as stupid as saying "no collusion" over and over again. I don't intend to argue about it. I don't have much else to say right now. As I said in the last thread, I'm just going to wait and see. You may search my post history to see I've always said, if he didn't do anything wrong, that's just great, but it doesn't mean the investigation shouldn't have taken place. There was "just cause" smoke all over the place, regardless of whether any fire was found.

 

[grizzard2bid]

Don't repost this neckbeard ever again. Feel free to buy his "BESTSELLER" lol

 

[Andy Capp]

Don't repost this neckbeard ever again. Feel free to buy his "BESTSELLER" lol

Yeah like someone making a case in a book needs to meet the same standard as someone in a court of law. Makes perfect sense.

 

[waiguoren]

@Jack V Savage

Here we have Kyle Kulinski---who I disagree with on almost all policy issues---laying out the correct approach for Democrats to have taken starting two years ago. If you try to learn from his analysis, you will improve. I agree with almost everything he says in this video.

 

[vengeful]

Oh, well I don’t know about all that. But it turns out MJ had some litigation against Nike using his silhouette photo. The SCOTUS just declined to intervene. It happened a few hours ago.

It was the photographer of that silhouette who had the lawsuit, not MJ.

 

[JamesRussler]

As usual you are all misinterpreting the result for the sake of trolling. I'll wait for the report and the results of the other criminal investigations. You can crow all you want. Thinking it's great that your President, his campaign, and his administration, were all unwitting puppets of the Russians is a good thing, is as sad as electing that criminal POS in the first place, and I don't think it's necessarily better than Trump being a treasonous Putin bottom bitch.

The narrative that the investigation shouldn't have occurred because there was no fool proof case for conspiracy is as stupid as saying "no collusion" over and over again. I don't intend to argue about it. I don't have much else to say right now. As I said in the last thread, I'm just going to wait and see. You may search my post history to see I've always said, if he didn't do anything wrong, that's just great, but it doesn't mean the investigation shouldn't have taken place. There was "just cause" smoke all over the place, regardless of whether any fire was found.

The investigation should never have taken place. That is what the evidence will show. Cry more.

 

[unimackpass]

Proverbs 26:27
He who makes a hole in the earth will himself go falling into it: and on him by whom a stone is rolled the stone will come back again.

 

[Limit Smasher]

I honestly think there are people that need to seek psychiatric help in this thread. Some of you clearly have paranoia issues.

So true. It's like the well-being of their existence absolutely depends on Trump getting in trouble for something.

I actually feel bad for them. They had their blinders on for the last two years and believed everything they were told by the MSM.

It's incredibly embarrassing for them and I wouldn't be surprised if there's already been a few suicides since yesterday's announcement.

 

[kpt018]

Yeah like someone making a case in a book needs to meet the same standard as someone in a court of law. Makes perfect sense.

Yeah, and what the fuck does collusion mean anyway? I bet if you polled the left and the right you'd get different answers on average. I know every agrees with the basic meaning (inappropriate collaboration) but what about the details? Does his campaign count? Does working with Russians count or only directly with the government? Do the activities have to be illegal (data sharing ok?)?

 

[grizzard2bid]

Yeah like someone making a case in a book needs to meet the same standard as someone in a court of law. Makes perfect sense.

I guess same way someone building a lego set doesn't have to meet same structural and regulatory requirements as an actual engineer. LOL
Why is did @BarryDillon repost that premium incel is beyond me.

I place more weight in Erin Brokovitch assements of this case, aka @Darkballs vs that goof. Where is @Darkballs, btw. Need his "legal opinion" here.

 

[grizzard2bid]

Yeah, and what the fuck does collusion mean anyway? I bet if you polled the left and the right you'd get different answers on average. I know every agrees with the basic meaning (inappropriate collaboration) but what about the details? Does his campaign count? Does working with Russians count or only directly with the government? Do the activities have to be illegal (data sharing ok?)?

Is buying foreign spy dossier Ok to get a FISA warrant on your political opponents?

 

[kpt018]

Is buying foreign spy dossier Ok to get a FISA warrant on your political opponents?

So do you have a post of mine where I said he'd get locked up or not?

 

[unimackpass]

So true. It's like the well-being of their existence absolutely depends on Trump getting in trouble for something.

I actually feel bad for them. They had their blinders on for the last two years and believed everything they were told by the MSM.

It's incredibly embarrassing for them and I wouldn't be surprised if there's already been a few suicides since yesterday's announcement.

When your whole reason to breath vanishes.

 

[Darkballs]

I place more weight in Erin Brokovitch assements of this case, aka @Darkballs vs that goof. Where is @Darkballs, btw. Need his "legal opinion" here.

Legal opinion on what? A report that hasn't been released? Barr's assessment of a report that hasn't been released?

The odds of finding a smoking gun linking to Trump was always a long shot on the collusion angle. As for obstruction, a bit more likely with what we knew already, but still can't make a comment until the report is released.

Until then, keep comparing me to a multi-millionaire paralegal (who you thought was a constitutional scholar) like it's some sort of sick burn.

 

[unimackpass]

Is buying foreign spy dossier Ok to get a FISA warrant on your political opponents?

It depends on what team your on.

 

[glenwo2]

IDK about MJ burning his party registration card, but I actually have my own source re his support for Trump—someone who knows MJ (former teammate). He’s endorsed Trump off the record. He freely admits it in social settings, but he won’t confirm it for the media, probably because of the business implications. So you’re hearing it from me. I don’t care if you believe that. It will come out at some point.

I think if he ever does admit it, it will be long after Trump finishes his 2nd term and is out of his office (ie. once all the hoopla dies down).

 

[kpt018]

It depends on what team your on.

So is believing in bullshit, apparently.