oh, you lil imp, you! you got me! caught me red-handed directly discussing the OP & thread topic in said thread. i suppose i’ll be hauling myself off to jail now
Meow my ex? Sounds like something @lsa would do."I met the person that is meow my ex"
Nothing wrong with the sentence.
It's not those type of sentences. What i'm objecting to is someone writing: "I had that fuck buddy until I met my ex".When she actually means she meets someone who will be her first boyfriend. Dont you see how retarded that is?
"After that I met my former partner" is an inapproriate way of putting it.
After that I met a new guy/girl.
If the subject was about sexual partners then that is already implied.No
You met new guy/girls every day. Ex means you where in a romantic relation with that person.
If the subject was about sexual partners then that is already implied.
"After that I met my former partner" is an inapproriate way of putting it.
After that I met a new guy/girl.
"New guy" is neutral.. "Met my ex" is ambigious as to whether it's an X now or then. my objection is on principle, not understanding. You are going out of your way to state it's not your current one which makes you look silly.Also new guy sounds like he is the current partner, but he is not cause he is a ex (there can be a new new guy).
Generally don't ever bring up the people you've had your penis inside or had their penis inside you with someone you are dating.It's improper.
You met someone who became your girlfriend/boyfriend. You did not meet someone who was your ex before you were even together!
I read this all the time, especially from women. It's meant as a statement of the present, but conflicts with a statement about the past.
Its main intent is to avoid confusion but it actually creates one where none existed.
I always assume this is coming from low IQ individuals.
/Aspie rant over
"New guy" is neutral.. "Met my ex" is ambigious as to whether it's an X now or then. my objection is on principle, not understanding. You are going out of your way to state it's not your current one which makes you look silly.
No you are silly because thats exactly why ex is used. New guy communicates nothing, cause it sounds like the current BF.
No it doesn't, in that case you would say my to be boyfriend. or simply boyfriend.
"After that I met a new guy/girl."
Again, where is the part he is a ex now specified in your alternative.
sounds like a you problem. semantics, pragmatics, conversation & general communication clearly aren’t a strength for you, but maybe you should stop weaponizing your ignorance as if it were anything but"New guy" is neutral.. "Met my ex" is ambigious as to whether it's an X now or then. my objection is on principle, not understanding. You are going out of your way to state it's not your current one which makes you look silly.
No it doesn't, in that case you would say my to be boyfriend. or simply boyfriend.
holy cow, you’ve gotten yourself so lost in the sauce at this pointI just answered that. if he was a current boyfriend he would be labelled as such.
My point is that the only alternative would be that he is an ex. It's self explanatory.holy cow, you’ve gotten yourself so lost in the sauce at this point
what? why do you insist on tangling yourself up in these totally unnecessary knots when the sentences/utterances you’ve taken issue w/ never needed fixing in the first place. it is bafflingMy point is that the only alternative would be that he is an ex. It's self explanatory.