- Joined
- Jan 4, 2015
- Messages
- 9,611
- Reaction score
- 4,204
20 + 50 = 60?Actually that's a 60% dive...
20 + 50 = 60?Actually that's a 60% dive...
20 + 50 = 60?
yet when you look at post dividend prices, they dont always drop the price of the dividend.Irrelevant as the stock will price that in either way
Lol. You're right of course. Its a good thing I married an Accountant.Can't add them bro.
100-20% = 80
80/2= 40
If you had 100 and you now have 40 that's 60% drop.
On top of what we already lost or in Total? Our Portfolio seems to be down about 20% right now. If it goes another 50% that's a 70% dive... that would be... bad.
yet when you look at post dividend prices, they dont always drop the price of the dividend.
yet when you look at post dividend prices, they dont always drop the price of the dividend.
Yes on top..i been staying away from the markets last few years comfortably living off my CDs but analyzed the charts this week to prepare for rotation
First long term support is 5k on the nasdaq..if you look at the spike since 2016 it just screams bubble..then if that breaks we may ride it down to 3k
Its a wide range so i plan to employ a sliding scale strategy with initial 20% or so at 5000-5250 then add 10% for every 250pts all the way down to 3k
Given the rise of the "new" economy nasdaq is the way to play the future imo..especially if social distancing and online commerce becomes a theme after this pandemic
Tqqq will be my ETF of choice..it is a triple levered play on the nasdaq..i.e. for every 1% it will go up or down 3%
Look at its long term chart..it went from 2 to 120 in less than a decade..if you average down between 3k and 5k and hold it for 10 years it will likely crush any other index return
Despite throwing down over ten thousand on puts at the end of the week I can’t help but wish I put more down.
It depends on the length of the depression. What if it continues below 3? If the recovery is slow which it very well could be with significant interest rate decreases to stimulate the economy not really being possible then decay and volatility can fuck your expected return.
Leveraged ETF's replicate the daily trading results and aren't really made for long term. Leveraged ETF's will under perform their Index quite a lot during sideways action and volatility due to this. They will also over perform during long and large bull runs. It's how the math and portfolio management works.
I'm not saying it's a bad decision to use leverage. I'm actually with you but I'd say committing to dollar cost averaging over an extended period of years will provide a substantially decreased level of downside risk if we're hit with a slow recovery or volatility with little to no expected decrease in potential returns.
I don't want to sound patronizing to you explaining how they work but it's just that your entry strategy of averaging down doesn't really account for the risks volatility or sideways action present to a leveraged ETF.
Just my two cents.
I sold my leveraged 3x ETF two years ago. Best fucking decision I made. You're better off picking a long term growth stock. Whoever stayed in must lost at least 80% of their holdings.
Its a short term disruptive event..not a depressionary scenario
Would be nice to be able to predict the future with absolute certainty. Wouldn't have to stick with these silly strategies that can be used no matter the market outcome.
And those would be..?
Is the USD the next bubble to pop?