Social Steven crowder demonetized

Meanwhile, here is the kind of content that Vice puts out which these social media platforms are happy to allow



Basically, the promotion of :eek::eek::eek::eek:phillia.



Yes, how dare kids play dress up and glorify self-expression and identification. But when a girl dresses up like a princess, that's totally cool. Even though she wasn't born a princess. Because she's a girl, and so I identify her as being viable for being a princess.

Here's a hot take for ya, nerd. Gay men can look at these kids and not want to fuck them. Just like you can see a a kid playing dress up, and not want to fuck her. Right?...... you can do that, right?

The only problem anyone should have with these kids is the same they should have with any beauty contest. It's weird as a basic concept. The gender and sexual preference of the demographic doesn't matter.
 
Yes, how dare kids play dress up and glorify self-expression and identification. But when a girl dresses up like a princess, that's totally cool. Even though she wasn't born a princess. Because she's a girl, and so I identify her as being viable for being a princess.

Here's a hot take for ya, nerd. Gay men can look at these kids and not want to fuck them. Just like you can see a a kid playing dress up, and not want to fuck her. Right?...... you can do that, right?

The only problem anyone should have with these kids is the same they should have with any beauty contest. It's weird as a basic concept. The gender and sexual preference of the demographic doesn't matter.

Fuck off :eek::eek::eek::eek:.
 


Even a guy who suffers from Beals-Hecht and gets mocked on a daily basis is telling him to grow thicker skin
Carlos blocked him after. Guess the truth hurts, doesn't it guys?


Has literally zero to do with Crowder using YouTube's platform to sell merchandise that violates their ToS.
 
So then there's no reason to complain. Great. We solved it.

He definitely “bootstrapped” that business from nothing. A good example of what one can accomplish with a vision, drive and commitment. But it was a really smart move on his part to set up a model that is less vulnerable to these predictable attacks. However, like another poster mentioned, they’ll likely try to attack his business from other points of vulnerability. I guess we’ll see how it all shakes out.

With that said, I do think there’s still room for complaining. Crowder’s income is just one small component of this story. The larger issue for many is around censorship, silencing, “banning”, etc. This shit was annoying when the evangelical blowhard mothers tried to ban Ozzy Osbourne, gangster rap, Howard Stern, Mortal Kombat, etc. And it’s just as annoying and sanctimonious in its modern form. Particularly when it comes from the “practice as I preach, not as I do” types.
 
YouTube gives money to Vox and other media sources.
Vox then complains about content of non media personalities.
YouTube then prevents the non media publisher from making money.
Seems legit.
 
Whatever. You want him to be punished by an authority.



He makes fun of everyone.

Everytime he has Ben Shapiro on, he makes Jew jokes.

An old employee was straight, but looked gay, so his name was 'Not-Gay Jared.'

He calls his lawyer 'Half-Asian.'

His producer is 'Quarter-Black.'

And he does impressions of everyone he mocks, including Trump.



Its like we haven't lived in a world that South Park and Family Guy hasn't been on TV for over two decades.



Do you want said clothing to be banned, and people who manufacture and wear the clothing to be arrested?


...and be financially punished for it, and probably banned.


...except to wear clothing with naughty words.


Oh this is rich.

A Marxists is posing as a journalist spreading FakeNews on the internet, and when he's called on his bullshit he bitches and moans to a massive media company to silence him...

...and you're calling me the snowflake.

<LikeReally5>

Funny how you haven't even mentioned Gaza is any of your posts.


I dont want the state involved. Hate speech is still free speech. I dont want clothing banned by govt or the wearers arrested.

If you really think crowder does not harbor genuine hate and is just kidding, i can at least comprehend this logic. Maybe you can post a clip where he states this. I will have an open mind.

Howard stern had made a ton of racial jokes, but i dont think he is a real racist.

Gaza is a complex issue. Egypt at fault, hamas at fault, israel at fault. Ppl that keep hamas in power at fault but need other options. But there can be no doubt ppl suffer there. As a jew myself its an even wierder issue. But if im walking down the street and someone had a "joke" shirt on w holocaust pic and a misspelled slur, thats a problem for me. How can i be asked to keep mental room in that moment for this guy to just be a jokester? And what factors would i use to decide?

Sometimes friends just go back and forth w racial jokes about eachother because they trust eachother. And know they dont mean it. Is that present here? How does it get establshed? Why can some pull it off better than others?

Also, explain why youtube (even if its being shitty) should not be free per open market principles.

No more bravado, trying to have an honest talk.
 
Last edited:
When advertisers are crucial to your bottom line, you've certainly failed at business if you've alienated all of them.
He alienated very few, if any, of his advertisers. There is a difference between failing and being sabotaged
 
Nothing new, except not going after people with not many followers.

You get banned from social media platforms for saying something Muhammad was a kiddie diddler, when that's an undisputed fact based on Islamic texts. That's how things work.
 
Yes, how dare kids play dress up and glorify self-expression and identification. But when a girl dresses up like a princess, that's totally cool. Even though she wasn't born a princess. Because she's a girl, and so I identify her as being viable for being a princess.

Here's a hot take for ya, nerd. Gay men can look at these kids and not want to fuck them. Just like you can see a a kid playing dress up, and not want to fuck her. Right?...... you can do that, right?

The only problem anyone should have with these kids is the same they should have with any beauty contest. It's weird as a basic concept. The gender and sexual preference of the demographic doesn't matter.

Whoa.

The posting of a loathsome cuck.

Yeah, we’re gonna do our best to protect the children who are trotted out to strip for gays men’s pleasure

How can you call yourself a man?
 
If there was no conspiracy between trump and russia, isn’t calling trump a cock holster for putin Defamation?

I don't know . . . if Crowder is going to run into issues over his videos then the same standard should be applied to others.
 
They don't need to choose; they seem to be able to do whatever the fuck they want without consequences. And they'll keep doing that until legislation catches up with the digital age. At this rate it doesn't even seem like it will happen at all.

That's what I'm saying . . . THEY need to choose before they're forced to choose.
 
Back
Top