Elections Steven A Smith.... For President?

ill take AOC, that would be hilarious if she won because it would be are first female president and would piss off maga :eek::eek::eek::eek: party off.

2026 : "Let's nominate Hillary, it'd piss the Republicans off."

....and she lost.

2024 : "Let's nominate Kamala, it'll piss Republicans off."

...and she lost.

2028 : "Let's nominate AOC, who's even less qualified than Hillary & Kamala and done nothing in Congress in a decade. That'll piss Republicans off."

shia-labeouf-just-do-it.gif
 
Followed by...

Yeah, you seem real serious about that, LOL.

*eyerolls*


in general im not against a woman president, in fact, it would show at America isn't a backwards ass nation who think the pre ww1 area way were sweet shit. As long as they do theyre job and serve the American people.
 
2026 : "Let's nominate Hillary, it'd piss the Republicans off."

....and she lost.

2024 : "Let's nominate Kamala, it'll piss Republicans off."

...and she lost.

2028 : "Let's nominate AOC, who's even less qualified than Hillary & Kamala and done nothing in Congress in a decade. That'll piss Republicans off."

shia-labeouf-just-do-it.gif

alright, Got some suggestions?


i'm listening.
 
in general im not against a woman president
Neither am I, if they're competent. In all honesty, you should be shooting for a Hillary-like candidate if you want a woman, and not a bimbo like Kamala Harris or AOC. Clinton ran into an anomaly in Trump, but that's the kind of woman you would want running if you were to choose one. Experienced and serious, who knows her shit. Not some stuttering bumbling bimbo, who needs all the help they can get to seem even remotely up to the task.

I'm sure Kamala Harris isn't as stupid as she presented herself as, but that's a big deal. You want someone who doesn't present as in over their head, and let's face it, Kamala was in over her head. She couldn't answer basic questions and had no vision for what she would do as President. She essentially ran as "Democrat Candidate". She had nothing, other than a letter beside her name.
, in fact, it would show at America isn't a backwards ass nation who think the pre ww1 area way were sweet shit.
This is just pandering nonsense. Nominate a woman just because of the social implications. Fuck everything else! It's a woman! Progress!

That doesn't win elections, dude. Most people aren't voting on Penis Vs Vagina.
 
Neither am I, if they're competent. In all honesty, you should be shooting for a Hillary-like candidate if you want a woman, and not a bimbo like Kamala Harris or AOC. Clinton ran into an anomaly in Trump, but that's the kind of woman you would want running if you were to choose one. Experienced and serious, who knows her shit. Not some stuttering bumbling bimbo, who needs all the help they can get to seem even remotely up to the task.

I'm sure Kamala Harris isn't as stupid as she presented herself as, but that's a big deal. You want someone who doesn't present as in over their head, and let's face it, Kamala was in over her head. She couldn't answer basic questions and had no vision for what she would do as President. She essentially ran as "Democrat Candidate". She had nothing, other than a letter beside her name.

This is just pandering nonsense. Nominate a woman just because of the social implications. Fuck everything else! It's a woman! Progress!

That doesn't win elections, dude. Most people aren't voting on Penis Vs Vagina.


i love how you put words in my mouth, where did i say Hilary did i say anything about hilalary? No? I said a qualified woman would be nice.
 
having the right give advice to the left on who to run based on what they like would be like a liberal suggesting that the GOP run Adam Kinzinger. lol.

weird thread.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top