I'm going to give you a reasonable response on my position and then you're going to do exactly what you accused me of doing. You've already decided I'm mentally ill so I'm probably just whispering into the wind here.
I was asked if I believed it was false, and I replied that I wasn't convinced it was true. Not being convinced it's "true" doesn't define my default position as "false".
I pointed out that the timing was suspicious. Trump's admin blatantly exercised it's authority to violate the First Amendment and received enormous backlash, including from other Republicans. Then, powerful people looking to curry the favor of a crooked admin hand him a story that will deflect attention, despite the fact no evidence came from the story and no details that would prove such a similar violation existed.
We've already heard this story before, and it went like this: The Biden admin
asked Facebook to do some things. They did some (where I assume they agreed it made sense) and ignored others (where I assume they did not).
I don't KNOW exactly what's happening here but if the Biden admin coerced any corporation, I'd be open to hearing evidence. Don't mistake me for someone that blindly trusts government, any government.
The horses mouth often lies, and considering the incentives they have to do so I think it's naive to believe them without receipts.