I have been thinking about it quite a bit lately and I have to wonder...
Do you guys think that these judges sometimes purposely give the wrong guy the decision to stir up controversy because for as far as I know they arent getting penalized for their disgraceful scores
For example, Who could possibly give Melvin Guillard a 30-27 victory over Jamie Varner or Anybody give Ryan Couture that fight against KJ or Leonard the win over Nam Phan the first time.
I honestly believe that you could take any random person off the street and have them judge these fights and give better decisions.
So you guys give me your opinions on the topic.
Do you guys think that these judges sometimes purposely give the wrong guy the decision to stir up controversy because for as far as I know they arent getting penalized for their disgraceful scores
For example, Who could possibly give Melvin Guillard a 30-27 victory over Jamie Varner or Anybody give Ryan Couture that fight against KJ or Leonard the win over Nam Phan the first time.
I honestly believe that you could take any random person off the street and have them judge these fights and give better decisions.
So you guys give me your opinions on the topic.