So about these judges

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by Icemanbjj, Jan 18, 2013.

  1. Icemanbjj

    Icemanbjj White Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have been thinking about it quite a bit lately and I have to wonder...

    Do you guys think that these judges sometimes purposely give the wrong guy the decision to stir up controversy because for as far as I know they arent getting penalized for their disgraceful scores

    For example, Who could possibly give Melvin Guillard a 30-27 victory over Jamie Varner or Anybody give Ryan Couture that fight against KJ or Leonard the win over Nam Phan the first time.

    I honestly believe that you could take any random person off the street and have them judge these fights and give better decisions.

    So you guys give me your opinions on the topic.
     
  2. TheRassler

    TheRassler ---- L E G E N D A R Y --------- p4p GOAT poster

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Messages:
    16,857
    Likes Received:
    18,993
    Location:
    #FreeNickDiaz
    They know they can screw up as many times as they want and they'll still keep their jobs, so why would it matter if they get the right or wrong decisions? they still get paid no matter what.

    edit: get rid of them altogether and make all decisions into Draws.

    problem solved.
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2013
  3. Zap Brennigan

    Zap Brennigan White Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Nope
    Maybe they just don't give a shit
     
  4. Icemanbjj

    Icemanbjj White Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    If all decisions were draws then it would be just like UFC in 93
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.