Should'nt Means/Cowboy be changed to a DQ

Project 86

Silver Belt
@Silver
Joined
Jun 6, 2009
Messages
12,792
Reaction score
245
it was clearly illegal and means said they were intentional in his interview

also anyone else annoyed that marc ratner and joe rogan were trying to act like big dan didn't know the rules when it was them who didn't
<24>

 
tenor.gif
 
Wasn't Guillard v Pearson a No Contest though? If I remember rightly that was a pretty blatant foul.
 
LOL and how many bottles of champagne had Big John chugged before tweeting this?
 
it better be turned over. that was quite the shit show.
 
At least it didn't go like Kevin Burns vs Rumble where the fighter who landed the illegal blow was awarded a victory after his opponent couldn't continue.

I'm just wondering why there was so much confusion and terrible misunderstanding of the rules at cageside. At least Miragliotta knew the rule.
 
Back
Top