Crime Should we shoot down the UFOs in New Jersey?

[lsa]

News nation...your trusted newYes source.....

and the girl in the video named Christina Gomez and this is her website https://www.ufonews.co/

Yes, she is a comedian...

 

[curryjunkie]

and the girl in the video named Christina Gomez and this is her website https://www.ufonews.co/

Yes, she is a comedian...

He will believe any old shit, look at his post history, I usually scroll past his usual bollocks..

 

[lsa]

He will believe any old shit, look at his post history, I usually scroll past his usual bollocks..

I just called him out because the video had some key details wrong and I honestly think she is lying on purpose.


This is the harbor the drones was seen over.
Quite a difference from Copenhagen.
Cops saw 4 drones and then made a report thats it.
Its pretty much a none story in Denmark.

 

[terrapin]

News nation...your trusted news source.....

What specifically do you criticize about their coverage of this? What is a better source for this story? I'm genuinely interested if you have one.

As far as I'm aware, they're the only news source that has covered this topic in any kind of depth or with any kind of thoroughness.

They have three correspondents who regularly contribute to the channel who live in New Jersey and have seen the different kinds of drones so that was quite beneficial to them and they put a reporter on the ground as well. They provided footage of drones and they've interviewed coast guard, law enforcement and government officials and residents.

They have taken the time to contrast those firsthand accounts and reports with what the official lie from the White House has been.

I'm not aware of any other news source that has put this kind of care into this ongoing story.

and I pointed out she is wrong / lying.
Saying Copenhagen instead of Koge and claiming Danish PET is investigating (which they are not) how is this making it satire?

The danish witness, and the police said it was drones..
Is she also making fun of the witness and Danish police for saying its drones?

I hope she did not quit her day job over this... because she is not very good at it

That's fine. I'm not disputing that. She got the names of the places wrong in the comedic skit that she threw together as a YouTube short.

The reason she's making fun of the use of the word drones is because drones is a word being used to make sense of phenomenon that is typically not drones at all. Even in the source you provided yourself on this thread the witness said they've never seen anything like it and that the drones made no sound whatsoever.

Combine that with lots of eyewitness accounts of these so-called drones, not even being fully material being made only of light and flying in ways that's impossible for a drone to fly or for durations that are impossible for drones to fly, And you can see why she's making fun of the use of the word drones every time a UAP is seen.

But she's also from America where the White House gave an official statement meant to explain this phenomenon to the American people where they claimed that the sightings were all lawful commercial or privately owned drones....

But the White House failed to say in the official statement that they had previously without telling anyone categorized two sets of phenomenon one which they tried to pass off as an explanation for everything which only included commercial and privately owned drones.

When pressed the White House representative admitted there's another category that isn't explained by those things, but only after making the official statement that said ALL of it was commercial or privately owned drones.....

So once again the use of the word drone was used to try to pass off a lie that claims total explanation for what is happening but that doesn't actually explain it.

And that's why her video is so funny because it's mocking this mainstream narrative that drones is the explanation because nobody who's actually following the story could possibly believe that commercially owned or privately owned drones can explain it. State level drones explain a big chunk of it though, but that's an entirely different matter and means the White House is lying.

And since these faps are happening all over the world in a very similar fashion, it's hilarious that everyone's buying the official narrative of drones.


That's why the video is funny.

 

[terrapin]

He will believe any old shit, look at his post history, I usually scroll past his usual bollocks..

What specifically about what I believe about this situation do you take issue with??

I am certain you have no idea what I think at all in fact and don't know enough about the situation to even discuss it.

Prove me wrong or reveal yourself to be a slanderer.

 

[lsa]

What specifically do you criticize about their coverage of this? What is a better source for this story? I'm genuinely interested if you have one.

As far as I'm aware, they're the only news source that has covered this topic in any kind of depth or with any kind of thoroughness.

They have three correspondents who regularly contribute to the channel who live in New Jersey and have seen the different kinds of drones so that was quite beneficial to them and they put a reporter on the ground as well. They provided footage of drones and they've interviewed coast guard, law enforcement and government officials and residents.

They have taken the time to contrast those firsthand accounts and reports with what the official lie from the White House has been.

I'm not aware of any other news source that has put this kind of care into this ongoing story.
That's fine. I'm not disputing that. She got the names of the places wrong in the comedic skit that she threw together as a YouTube short.

The reason she's making fun of the use of the word drones is because drones is a word being used to make sense of phenomenon that is typically not drones at all. Even in the source you provided yourself on this thread the witness said they've never seen anything like it and that the drones made no sound whatsoever.

Combine that with lots of eyewitness accounts of these so-called drones, not even being fully material being made only of light and flying in ways that's impossible for a drone to fly or for durations that are impossible for drones to fly, And you can see why she's making fun of the use of the word drones every time a UAP is seen.

But she's also from America where the White House gave an official statement meant to explain this phenomenon to the American people where they claimed that the sightings were all lawful commercial or privately owned drones....

But the White House failed to say in the official statement that they had previously without telling anyone categorized two sets of phenomenon one which they tried to pass off as an explanation for everything which only included commercial and privately owned drones.

When pressed the White House representative admitted there's another category that isn't explained by those things, but only after making the official statement that said ALL of it was commercial or privately owned drones.....

So once again the use of the word drone was used to try to pass off a lie that claims total explanation for what is happening but that doesn't actually explain it.

And that's why her video is so funny because it's mocking this mainstream narrative that drones is the explanation because nobody who's actually following the story could possibly believe that commercially owned or privately owned drones can explain it. State level drones explain a big chunk of it though, but that's an entirely different matter and means the White House is lying.

And since these faps are happening all over the world in a very similar fashion, it's

hilarious that everyone's buying the official narrative of drones.


That's why the video is funny.

If its satirical about the White House why is she using the following hashtag for the video?

"Denmark is seeing UFOs #shorts"

 

[evergreenrider]

Tera is dying on this hill and nothing yall say will change that lol

 

[terrapin]

If its satirical about the White House why is she using the following hashtag for the video?

"Denmark is seeing UFOs #shorts"

How many times do I have to tell you? I have no reason or a desire to defend that woman's short? I literally have never watched a single episode of her podcast or whatever it is she does on YouTube.


The source and quote that you provided in this thread said that in Denmark the eyewitness said they've never seen anything like it and that the drones don't make any sound at all. That kind of reporting among other anomalous phenomenon is a part of what's happening in New Jersey that makes the official drone explanation from the government inadequate.


How can you keep failing to address that and all the rest of the points I've made? come on man have an honest discussion with me.

 

[lsa]

Tera is dying on this hill and nothing yall say will change that lol

Well I should leave him to die alone on this hill.
I have no dog in this fight other than calling out that chick that post wrong information.

How many times do I have to tell you? I have no reason or a desire to defend that woman's short? I literally have never watched a single episode of her podcast or whatever it is she does on YouTube.


The source and quote that you provided in this thread said that in Denmark the eyewitness said they've never seen anything like it and that the drones don't make any sound at all. That kind of reporting among other anomalous phenomenon is a part of what's happening in New Jersey that makes the official drone explanation from the government inadequate.


How can you keep failing to address that and all the rest of the points I've made? come on man have an honest discussion with me.

Because as I said I only call you out for posting a video with false information.
YOU posted the video but you dont want to defend it?
Then why post it and you have been defending her claiming oh its satire..
Which is clearly not, and you edited your post to include satire.

I am done here. I dont want to waste my time, but a pro tip... next time check your sources before posting them.

 

[terrapin]

Well I should leave him to die alone on this hill.
I have no dog in this fight other than calling out that chick that post wrong information.


Because as I said I only call you out for posting a video with false information.
YOU posted the video but you dont want to defend it?
Then why post it and you have been defending her claiming oh its satire..
Which is clearly not, and you edited your post to include satire.

I am done here. I dont want to waste my time, but a pro tip... next time check your sources before posting them.

You're done here because you are afraid to address the rest of the information and the actual reason I posted the video which you haven't been willing to address because I think you can't address it.

You came in to mock have misrepresented my position Intentionally nsisted on trying to get me to defend something that I said from the very start I don't care about defending and won't address the actual reason I posted the video.


I explained in detail why I posted the video and your next post asked why I posted the video!!! You don't know enough about the situation to know why her video is funny even.... You're so uneducated about the topic and no so little about it that you can't see why it's funny.... I explained to you why it's funny and it would make sense if you had read it, but I doubt you read it. And if you did, you're to afraid to address it.

You're just not being honest and are criminally underinformed and can't address anything I'm actually saying because you don't know what you're talking about. You literally don't know a single thing about what's happening in New Jersey and that those same things are happening all over the world and that the reporting around them is extremely similar and why it would be funny that people keep calling them drones.

Since you don't know anything about the faps going on all over the planet, you don't see why the Denmark report has some similarities to those in that these drones made no sound whatsoever and that the eyewitness in your post that you quoted said they've never seen anything like it.

 

[lsa]

You're done here because you are afraid to address the rest of the information and the actual reason I posted the video which you haven't been willing to address because I think you can't address it.

You came in to mock have misrepresented my position Intentionally nsisted on trying to get me to defend something that I said from the very start I don't care about defending and won't address the actual reason I posted the video.


I explained in detail why I posted the video and your next post asked why I posted the video!!! You don't know enough about the situation to know why her video is funny even.... You're so uneducated about the topic and no so little about it that you can't see why it's funny.... I explained to you why it's funny and it would make sense if you had read it, but I doubt you read it. And if you did, you're to afraid to address it.

You're just not being honest and are criminally underinformed and can't address anything I'm actually saying because you don't know what you're talking about. You literally don't know a single thing about what's happening in New Jersey and that those same things are happening all over the world and that the reporting around them is extremely similar and why it would be funny that people keep calling them drones.

Since you don't know anything about the faps going on all over the planet, you don't see why the Denmark report has some similarities to those in that these drones made no sound whatsoever and that the eyewitness in your post that you quoted said they've never seen anything like it.

In my first post I simply pointed out it as false information nothing else then you started defending the video and then change your post to that is was satire.
Which its clearly is not based on her website and YouTube.

I been VERY clear that the only thing I will be addressing is her video.
Yet you keep writing about other things.

The danish witness claimed it was drones, the police that saw them claimed it was drones. Based on the people that saw them, I would guess its drones.

But keep dying on this hill no matter how you spin it you posted a video of a girl spreading false information.
And no it is not satire.. Its clear as day.

 

[Andy Capp]

and the girl in the video named Christina Gomez and this is her website https://www.ufonews.co/

Yes, she is a comedian...

LOL I feel dumb for clicking on that link

What garbage.

 

[lsa]

LOL I feel dumb for clicking on that link

What garbage.

Yeah and its clearly not her making a satirical video.
She just pushed false info

 

[terrapin]

In my first post I simply pointed out it as false information nothing else then you started defending the video and then change your post to that is was satire.
Which its clearly is not based on her website and YouTube.

I been VERY clear that the only thing I will be addressing is her video.
Yet you keep writing about other things.

The danish witness claimed it was drones, the police that saw them claimed it was drones. Based on the people that saw them, I would guess its drones.

But keep dying on this hill no matter how you spin it you posted a video of a girl spreading false information.
And no it is not satire.. Its clear as day.

Yes, the Danish reporting said It was drones but they said the drones don't make a single sound and that matches reporting from all over the world which is why it's relevant.

specifically regarding the post you made about the Denmark drone, are you aware of any drones that make no sound at all that also hover?

Do you have an explanation for why the person YOU quoted said that it was really strange and they've never seen anything like it and that the drones made no sound whatsoever?

You should be able to address that since you yourself posted it.





The reason you fail to see the humor in that woman's comedic skit that she put on YouTube is because you don't know the context, which is why I keep trying to tell you the context.

That video is funny because the word drone doesn't explain what people are actually seeing in many cases and yet people keep droning on with the word drone.

That's why that video is funny.

 

[terrapin]

LOL I feel dumb for clicking on that link

What garbage.

It's relevant because although she gets the details wrong, what she doesn't get wrong is mocking the official explanation of commercial and private drones. It doesn't make any sense based on the actual reports from law enforcement, the Coast guard and government officials in New Jersey.

That skit was about Denmark and apparently she got the name of the place wrong but I don't even think that's really relevant. The witness in Denmark seemed freaked out by it. The drones didn't make any sound and they said they have never seen anything like it.

There weren't any follow-up questions from the reporter as far as I'm aware, but oftentimes in these recent faps you find out that known drone may not even be the best explanation as they're often just orbs of light, no blinking lights and no sound whatsoever.

 

[lsa]

Yes, the Danish reporting said It was drones but they said the drones don't make a single sound and that matches reporting from all over the world which is why it's relevant.

specifically regarding the post you made about the Denmark drone, are you aware of any drones that make no sound at all that also hover?

Do you have an explanation for why the person YOU quoted said that it was really strange and they've never seen anything like it and that the drones made no sound whatsoever?

You should be able to address that since you yourself posted it.





The reason you fail to see the humor in that woman's comedic skit that she put on YouTube is because you don't know the context, which is why I keep trying to tell you the context.

That video is funny because the word drone doesn't explain what people are actually seeing in many cases and yet people keep droning on with the word drone.

That's why that video is funny.


So

yeah thats why she hashtag it with UFO in Denmark... because reasons.
You thought it was legit and you got called out.
There was nothing humors about the video.
Other than she wanted it to be NOT drones.
Because she is into UFO and UAPS.
Her agenda is pretty clear.

Again the witness said it was drones, the police said it was drones, I did not see them. So all I have to go on is... that its... drones.. Until some one shows up with more and better information well its drones.
But I am sure PET who is investigating this will tell us.. oh wait they are not she made shit up.

 

[terrapin]

yeah thats why she hashtag it with UFO in Denmark... because reasons.
You thought it was legit and you got called out.
There was nothing humors about the video.
Other than she wanted it to be NOT drones.
Because she is into UFO and UAPS.
Her agenda is pretty clear.

Again the witness said it was drones, the police said it was drones, I did not see them. So all I have to go on is... that its... drones.. Until some one shows up with more and better information well its drones.
But I am sure PET who is investigating this will tell us.. oh wait they are not she made shit up.

What drones are you aware of that make no sound whatsoever that hover??

Also, what do you make of the witness you quoted saying that they've never seen anything like it and seeming a little freaked out about that?

 

[lsa]

What drones are you aware of that make no sound whatsoever that hover??

Also, what do you make of the witness you quoted saying that they've never seen anything like it and seeming a little freaked out about that?

One guy got freaked out.
Thats not a great sample.
The cops saw the drones did not freak out
They simply said it was drones.
There has in the Nordic been seen a lot of drones often around airports, it has been liked to Russia and Russian hybrid war.
What this was I dont know, but I am not taking one guys word as gospel.
I am sure he saw something, but what it actually was we will probably never know.

 

[terrapin]

One guy got freaked out.
Thats not a great sample.
The cops saw the drones did not freak out
They simply said it was drones.
There has in the Nordic been seen a lot of drones often around airports, it has been liked to Russia and Russian hybrid war.
What this was I dont know, but I am not taking one guys word as gospel.
I am sure he saw something, but what it actually was we will probably never know.

Well that's a good answer. I think that's a possible explanation for that particular case, but if you take in all the accounts from around the world, especially what's going on in New Jersey, it lends some credibility to what that one witness said about the drones making no sound at all.

Drones making no sound at all is one of the features of what's happening in New Jersey alongside of other drones that are making sounds.

And the ones that make no sound and seem to be only composed of light don't really fit the category of drones at all.

The White House's official statement and follow-up responses to questions actually confirms that there is something going on in New Jersey that is not explained by commercial or privately owned drones. It is also interesting that sightings continue to happen even after the government threatened deadly force and made it illegal for anyone to fly drones over those spaces.

I have no idea what the explanation is either, and frankly, the thing that I find most interesting about it is that if you take in all of the accounts and data from government officials, law officials, eyewitnesses, etc. No explanation that anyone comes up with makes any sense as an explanation.

 

[RoastBeast]

You're arguing with a cat.