Should UFC get rid of Octagon Post Fight Interviews for the loser?

BustaHimes

Power Overwhelming
@Blue
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
898
Reaction score
0
They already have to do a later Post Fight interview. Let them leave the octagon following a tough loss to see the doctor, regain their emotions and thoughts.

What say you Sherdog?
 
Joe Rogan: "Tell us what was going through your head at that exact moment."
 
No. Viewers like to hear what the loser has to say. It's instant gratification for the fans.
 
Your a nice guy.

But fuck all that. I enjoy seeing what the loser has to say. People like hendricks are comedy gold when they lose.
 
It does make more sense if a fighter was KO'd. They likely wont even remember the interview.
 
they're the reason I keep going on.
 
If we did that then we wouldn't have gotten Tito's infamous "I'D LIKE TO SEE ANYONE FIGHT WITH A CRACKED SKULL" interview

Fuck no
 
I wouldn't complain, I usually fast forward during the interviews anyway.
 
They interview the loser post fight? I thought only main events.
 
The winners interviews are boring, thank this person, I'm so awesome. Get rid of those

ONLY interview the losers, that's where the gold is
 
It's morbid curiosity to see them ask the loser his thoughts. In fact,I think it would get more attention/popularity if they trolled the loser. Joe starting off with a "So, tell us your thoughts on why you sucked so bad tonight?"
 
Depends...

Example, I hated when Rogan interviewed JDS after taking a 5 round beating vs Cain... Heartbreaking

Interview Nick Diaz after a close fight with andersson silva, no1 were injuried, good stuff.
 
Your a nice guy.

But fuck all that. I enjoy seeing what the loser has to say. People like hendricks are comedy gold when they lose.
This. It is far more entertaining to see how one reacts in defeat. That will make you or break you with fans. I enjoy some of the lame excuses for laughs. Cracked skull, my sparring partners failed me, had to shit, etc
 
Back
Top