Law Should Robert Maudsley be in prison?

[blaseblase]

Robert Maudsley - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

TLDR: in 1975 he killed a guy for revealing he was a child molestor. He then turned himself into authorities.

In 1977 he tortured and killed another prisoner who was a child molestor.

In 1978 he killed two other prisoners. One who had killed his wife and one who was yet another child molestor.

This case has me conflicted. On the one hand, I absolutely believe he would kill again if he were released into society. For that reason I don't believe he should be set free. On the other hand, I'm not sure anything he did was morally wrong.

 

[Flower2dPeople]

He should stay wherever he is. It's more efficient for him to be there rather than hunting pedros outside.

 

[blaseblase]

He should stay wherever he is. It's more efficient for him to be there rather than hunting pedros outside.

Well he's in solitary confinement last I checked. Considered a danger to other prisoners.

Personally I would let him hang out with non-pdf files and non-wife beaters under heavy surveillance to make sure he can be in their presence without killing them.

 

[Zer]

Dude was put in solitary confinement in 1983, two years before I was born, and is still in solitary today. Crazy to think that for my entire life he's been in solitary

 

[blaseblase]

Dude was put in solitary confinement in 1983, two years before I was born, and is still in solitary today. Crazy to think that for my entire life he's been in solitary

Well he's obviously a danger to anyone accused of being a child predator. Shame the prison can't have a predator-free zone for him to hang out in every once in a while.

 

[Zer]

Well he's obviously a danger to anyone accused of being a child predator. Shame the prison can't have a predator-free zone for him to hang out in every once in a while.

Well when he tortured the one guy to death, he did it alongside one of his buddies who was convicted of raping a teenager. So to be fair he can get along with predators sometimes

 

[PBAC]

It just sounds like he wanted to morally convince himself it was correct to do something he wanted to do anyway. Murder bad + you do murder repeatedely = u bad

 

[Hellowhosthat]

He should definitely be in prison. Whether he should be in solitary is a bit more debateable but I suspect he likes killing and will kill sex offenders if he has the option between them and somebody else but would be concerned that if he didn't have that option he might kill someone anyway.

 

[UberHere]

Robert Maudsley - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

TLDR: in 1975 he killed a guy for revealing he was a child molestor. He then turned himself into authorities.

In 1977 he tortured and killed another prisoner who was a child molestor.

In 1978 he killed two other prisoners. One who had killed his wife and one who was yet another child molestor.

This case has me conflicted. On the one hand, I absolutely believe he would kill again if he were released into society. For that reason I don't believe he should be set free. On the other hand, I'm not sure anything he did was morally wrong.

Morality aside, he’s guilty of murder and should serve his sentence.

Edit:
Alright fuck it. I’ll get sucked into the morality part. Torturing and killing sex offenders is prison morality (or I should say lack of morality). From a Judeo Christian standpoint it is still immoral. “Vengeance belongs to God alone”. Then you’ve got the New Testament saying to follow the laws of your civil government. Therefore I can’t make a moral defense for him.