Short Legs Are Extremely Unsightly

STEVEN SEAGOLD

Banned
Banned
Joined
Jan 4, 2015
Messages
3,078
Reaction score
0
rachel.bilson-short.legs.jpg
731da1cb-6e2c-44fc-9bb7-d29f9196591c.jpg
kate.hudson-short.legs2.jpg
Rachel_Bilson_short.legs.jpg


clairedanes1.jpg
 
Shrug. I think there are flaws that are way higher up on the priority list.
 
Woman's biggest weapon is between her legs!Wooood,from pic A to Z!
 
Shrug. I think there are flaws that are way higher up on the priority list.
It's pretty important and often forgotten these days. Female fashion/beauty/makeup is all about illusion. High-waisted jeans/pants/skirts is all about making the legs appear longer. Combine that with some decent sized heels, and a short crop top and you've got yourself quite the visual illusion strategy.

The ideal female proportion is a relative short torso, long legs, and short to average arm length.

Another strategy to make the legs appear longer and torso shorter is acquiring a larger ass, whether through weight-training, surgical enhancement, or both. A larger rear makes your femur look longer, and creates a tapered illusion at the pelvic region which makes the waist look higher up the torso.

But at the same time more mass to the thighs makes your legs look shorter.
 
It's pretty important and often forgotten these days. Female fashion/beauty/makeup is all about illusion. High-waisted jeans/pants/skirts is all about making the legs appear longer. Combine that with some decent sized heels, and a short crop top and you've got yourself quite the visual illusion strategy.

The ideal female proportion is a relative short torso, long legs, and short to average arm length.

Another strategy to make the legs appear longer and torso shorter is acquiring a larger ass, whether through weight-training, surgical enhancement, or both. A larger rear makes your femur look longer, and creates a tapered illusion at the pelvic region which makes the waist look higher up the torso.

But at the same time more mass to the thighs makes your legs look shorter.

Yeah but I'm really not too fussed about female fashion, nor what illusions it tries to create. If I bust out the measuring tape, it's really just to get an official measurement on dem tittays. I'm not doing forearm length to torso ratios.
 
Yeah but I'm really not too fussed about female fashion, nor what illusions it tries to create. If I bust out the measuring tape, it's really just to get an official measurement on dem tittays. I'm not doing forearm length to torso ratios.
Unconsciously you do, just like everyone does when they gauge how attractive someone is

If a woman has really short legs or gorilla long arms, you might not specifically identify it, but you'll find her unattractive in a general sense compared to the idealized female. Professor Jordan Peterson talks about how this plays a role the sexual social microcosm.
 
Lol I'd not really thought about it but the images that you presented as evidence it's hard to argue against.
 
Short legs? No
Those girls have nonexistent calves.
Huge difference there pal!
 
Shrug. I think there are flaws that are way higher up on the priority list.
I'm guessing the tiny tits in all of the pics in the OP were a bit more glaring.
 
I don't think it is short legs that are unsightly, it is proportioned legs to the torso that is the problem. Look at the girl you posted as an example. Long ass body, then dwarf legs.

Short chicks with short legs look great.
 
I'm a manlet with short legs
<DCrying>
Don't worry, it's not as bad for men. Certainly not ideal, but it is what it is.

Short legs long torso on a male looks dominant if accompanied with long arms... AKA Silverback mode.

IMO the ideal proportions = long legs, long arms, short torso, small waist, wide clavicles

AKA the African American/Caribbean

BzIsZ7UCMAACRew.jpg


Only downside is they usually have small ribcages which mean chest doesn't really stick out as far which can lead to a more bird-chested visual, throwing an already arm dominant physique further in the deep end

I think if I had to choose, an arm-dominant physique is always better than a torso dominant one. But the best is usually a good mix, if more arm dominant.

Brock is an awesome example of when long limbs meets a massive ribcage... Awesome balance of arm and torso dominance

upload_2017-9-5_20-45-47.jpeg
 
I don't think it is short legs that are unsightly, it is proportioned legs to the torso that is the problem. Look at the girl you posted as an example. Long ass body, then dwarf legs.

Short chicks with short legs look great.
That's what i mean by short legs.. Relative proportions. Long torsos and short legs are not ideal for women. It makes sense that they gear their fashion and beauty strategies to combat this. Long legs are obviously idealized.

Relative long legs that is...

Even still, tall people will generally still appear long-legged because 1. in absolute terms they are long in the legs and 2. volumetrically bone grows substantially more longitudinally

This is why shorter people are always visually stockier... You have ethnic groups like Pacific Islanders that have crazy thickness and stockiness, but even then they do not grow bones laterally as much as vertically
 
Back
Top