- Joined
- Mar 4, 2009
- Messages
- 55,468
- Reaction score
- 66,996
I actually think he may win this one.
SHFT/PWD 245: RATINGS...The Thread
- Thread starter TheStruggle
- Start date
- Status
I actually think he may win this one.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2014
- Messages
- 73,662
- Reaction score
- 129,829
Well hello Coach Sara
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2014
- Messages
- 24,531
- Reaction score
- 28,650
lol, thats cesaro's chick irl. been together since the indies.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2013
- Messages
- 28,148
- Reaction score
- 3
Great self pwnage in this thread
http://www.wrestlingforum.com/general-wwe/1817546-well-wyatts-ruined.html
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2008
- Messages
- 103,727
- Reaction score
- 124,975
Those people scare me...
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 88,635
- Reaction score
- 46,070
They are a bunch of pencil necked geeks.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2013
- Messages
- 28,148
- Reaction score
- 3
That's were Bubba started...
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2013
- Messages
- 28,148
- Reaction score
- 3
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2009
- Messages
- 70,208
- Reaction score
- 43,265
- Joined
- May 22, 2014
- Messages
- 50,843
- Reaction score
- 50,656
So two matches were disappointing, Kane/Rillins and Owens/Ryback, no time to even build anything for either.
Divas match was the surprise of the night.
Fun tag, even with the botch. Cena put over some up and comer.
It's a B rated PPV, but the Taker/Brock match makes it a solid B+
Maybe Raw is the start of something, Reigns starts his Austin run, Taker is his final opponent at Mania, with Wyatt's and Taker being the Wyattsboro Baptist Church with Stephanie being Sister Abigail the higher motherfucking power.
Book it.
Divas match was the surprise of the night.
Fun tag, even with the botch. Cena put over some up and comer.
It's a B rated PPV, but the Taker/Brock match makes it a solid B+
Maybe Raw is the start of something, Reigns starts his Austin run, Taker is his final opponent at Mania, with Wyatt's and Taker being the Wyattsboro Baptist Church with Stephanie being Sister Abigail the higher motherfucking power.
Book it.
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2005
- Messages
- 3,797
- Reaction score
- 1
The last two Undertaker vs Lesnar matches have been better than I expected, and I'll admit I'm eating a little crow to say that. Before their WM30 match I was against Lesnar being Taker's opponent, figuring Taker should engage in more "showy" matches and that he wasn't in physical condition to take on a brute like Lesnar. Since I would never wish harm on a performer, least of all a legend like Taker, it was to my chagrin that I was seemingly proven correct due to Taker's injury and a sub-par match between the two.
So I was pleasantly surprised to see Brock and Taker in a very good match at Summerslam... until the ending. I was already questioning the decision to seemingly put Taker in the heel role by hitting the low blow before the match, and then getting the cheap win... I mean, I get that it sets the stage for a rubber match without Lesnar taking a "real" loss but I genuinely could not fully invest in the feud with a beloved legend like Taker being so dishonorable.
Then we get into this match and LESNAR wins with the help of a cheap shot, when Taker needs NO protection of his legacy or status at this point. Again the announcers played up the "doing whatever it takes" angle, and even praised Lesnar as a warrior... as if whoever was writing their lines has no idea what cheating to win, and particularly low blows, mean to our culture. I mean, I joked about the Bobby Hill thing, but the whole idea is that low blows are the last resort of women and others at a physical disadvantage for self defense. If you follow hockey you know how hated Milan Lucic is largely for his habit of tapping dudes in the sack with his stick. So how does this match help Lesnar? I guess at the end of the day I just think it's most important to keep Lesnar looking strong, Taker being able to hold his head high with respect, and these endings have just shit all over that. /Rant Over
So I was pleasantly surprised to see Brock and Taker in a very good match at Summerslam... until the ending. I was already questioning the decision to seemingly put Taker in the heel role by hitting the low blow before the match, and then getting the cheap win... I mean, I get that it sets the stage for a rubber match without Lesnar taking a "real" loss but I genuinely could not fully invest in the feud with a beloved legend like Taker being so dishonorable.
Then we get into this match and LESNAR wins with the help of a cheap shot, when Taker needs NO protection of his legacy or status at this point. Again the announcers played up the "doing whatever it takes" angle, and even praised Lesnar as a warrior... as if whoever was writing their lines has no idea what cheating to win, and particularly low blows, mean to our culture. I mean, I joked about the Bobby Hill thing, but the whole idea is that low blows are the last resort of women and others at a physical disadvantage for self defense. If you follow hockey you know how hated Milan Lucic is largely for his habit of tapping dudes in the sack with his stick. So how does this match help Lesnar? I guess at the end of the day I just think it's most important to keep Lesnar looking strong, Taker being able to hold his head high with respect, and these endings have just shit all over that. /Rant Over
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2008
- Messages
- 103,727
- Reaction score
- 124,975
That's Mexicos greatest export damn it
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2013
- Messages
- 28,148
- Reaction score
- 3
and he's the US champ
- Status
