• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

*Serious question about Rockhold Vs Bisping*

Seiryoku Zenyo

We are all one
@Brown
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
4,433
Reaction score
661
How many minutes would take Rockhold to show Bisping he's not at the top level?

I mean, Rockhold is a beast, much more technical and powerful than Bisping. He was preparing to defend his belt against Weidman who's really close to his level. While Bisping only had two weeks to prepare to this rematch.

So, question is:

If you were forced to bet $1000 to predict how long would this take for Rockhold, would you choose:

a) Less than .5 rounds
b) Between .5 and 1.5 rounds
c) Between 1.5 and 2.5 rounds
d) Between 2.5 and 3.5 rounds
e) More than 3.5 rounds.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Cannot compute due to Luke's faux-MCL/sprain and Bisping's shifty-eye.
 
I wouldn't necessarily agree that Rockhold is more technical. I think they have strengths in different areas; Rockhold's kicks are much smoother and less telegraphed for example, but in terms of footwork and combination striking Bisping is superior..

Anyhow; Bisping's gameplan is allegedly to close the distance and stay in his face; so one way or the other I don't expect it to get past the 2nd; I'd take option b.
 
This poll is rigged!

F) Bisping in the 4th by TKO

upload_2016-6-4_11-21-0.png
 
The guy is dying to know if he should bet the over or under lolllll
 
Should have put 3 more options for under 1 round n half so you would really be convinced to bet the under then buddy......Who are u fooling no way you bet the over
 
Just got off the phone with my top secret source Bisping wins round 3 via TKO
 
Back
Top