- Joined
- Sep 13, 2013
- Messages
- 3,279
- Reaction score
- 1,488
Fuck any of them that profited off this info.... unfortunately for us nothing will come of it
how is anyone on sherdog going to know what information was conveyed at that meeting
That could be a plausible excuse if not for the fact that she made no stock sales since being sworn into office until immediately following the briefing.
She is also facing opposition from within the party, including a close ally of Trump:
yeah...self ownage is the best if you have the need to gloat and pretend you didnt catch what the person was talking about just so you could make a point to them that they were wording something wrongly....instead of just saying ...hey man....youre wording that wrongly....its obvious that there needs some oversight investigation into these matters.......thats all that really matters no matter how someone speaks of it "get the torches and pitchforks!" kind of thing, we all know the person bringing it up isnt on some commission/jury so of course they arent going to be convicting or even investigating the people.....so why come at them like this is a court of law....its a sherdog thread....
If they don't know and can't reproduce what was conveyed at the meeting how can they posit with certainty that a law was broken? Yet this is exactly what has been asserted.
Self-ownage is always the best ownage.
Concession accepted.yeah...self ownage is the best if you have the need to gloat and pretend you didnt catch what the person was talking about just so you could make a point to them that they were wording something wrongly....instead of just saying ...hey man....youre wording that wrongly....its obvious that there needs some oversight investigation into these matters.......thats all that really matters no matter how someone speaks of it "get the torches and pitchforks!" kind of thing, we all know the person bringing it up isnt on some commission/jury so of course they arent going to be convicting or even investigating the people.....so why come at them like this is a court of law....its a sherdog thread....
No, "any member of the public" did not have access to the information presented at that meeting. The markets were still churning along healthily at that time, and would continue to do so for a few more weeks.This isn't non-public information - people have been tweeting about this coronavirus since way early on, experts sharing their expert opinion with Congress is not material, non-public information. Technically, any member of the public could have found their own experts and obtained similar information.
The only issue here is with the one GOP Senator that downplayed the virus, got the briefing, dumped stock, and then remained silent instead of sounding the alarm. And this isn't even a legal issue, it's more of a moral / democratic issue.
Right, so under a proper investigation a forensics accountant would scrutinize her trades before taking office to find anomalies from her usual behavior.That was like two weeks of no trading, a bit of a stretch to conspire a grandiose scheme. Maybe her handlers were on vacation? Purely speculation.
Doug is speculation, bad optics, doesn’t automatically make you guilty. Stocks will always be someone profiting off the lots of others. I got in some shares recently, I’ll be profiting as much as I can, is normal
admission to being a low esteem pedantic dick in this particular case.... acceptedConcession accepted.
If they don't know and can't reproduce what was conveyed at the meeting how can they posit with certainty that a law was broken? Yet this is exactly what has been asserted.
Self-ownage is always the best ownage.
Last time I checked unless something changed, Bezos is not an elected official.By far the largest executive seller was Amazon. AMZN 1.96% com Inc. Chief Executive Jeffrey Bezos, who sold a total of $3.4 billion in Amazon AMZN 1.96% shares in the first week of February, shortly before the stock market peaked, allowing him to avoid paper losses of roughly $317 million if he had held the stock through March 20, according to the Journal analysis.
The sales represented roughly 3% of Mr. Bezos’s Amazon holdings, according to the most recently available regulatory filings. He sold almost as much stock during the first week in February as he sold during the previous 12 months.
Amazon didn’t immediately provide a comment on behalf of Mr. Bezos.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/bezos-other-corporate-executives-sold-shares-just-in-time-11585042204
You fucking retard, she traded it on privy information, its insider trading.She definitely should have left it in, and lost everything, just to appease jealous leftists.
There would have been a stimulus package already if Pelosi and her crew did not try to sneak in payments for illegals and a bunch of other fluff to help her side buy votes.Bumping this to remind people how much of a shithead Loeffler and Perdue is
Both are running again for the Senate and if they win, Bitch McConnell remains majority leader and there will be no stimulus package.
Bumping this to remind people how much of a shithead Loeffler and Perdue is
Both are running again for the Senate and if they win, Bitch McConnell remains majority leader and there will be no stimulus package.