• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Sean Strickland makes Headlines on X

Kinda like dogs. Kids don't need to be hit. And if you ever think they did, there was already a problem with the parenting way before the "needing to hit them"

And if you're somebody who thinks that you got hit and turned out just fine so kids should still be hit? Then you did not turn out fine.
^^^^^^^This guy gets it
 
Question for all the people who got smacked:

If it worked, why did you get smacked again?


"Good evidence suggests that physical punishment does not reduce defiant or aggressive behaviour nor does it promote long-term positive behaviour in children.11,14,15,16 A systematic review of 53 studies on the use of physical punishment in schools found that it had negative effects on the academic performance of children and resulted in behavioural issues (e.g. violent behaviour and aggressive conduct).17"



I know everyone is looking for easy answers, but maybe question things a little more?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ THIS

I know a lot of people mean well and don't want to judge their parents, but the fact remains that they were abused as children, whether they want to admit that or not.

If they want to believe that a little child abuse is fine, then ok, that fucked up but I get it.

But it's asinine to pretend that an adult physically striking a child is not abusive.
 
Spanking or smacking your child as a form of discipline is not inherently child abuse.
It may not inherently be child abuse, but as a matter of empirically tested truth it's usually worse than completely ineffective as a child disciplinary measure and it foregoes the opportunity to actually teach your child to think and recognize the difference between right and wrong. And, of course, it's child abuse vastly more than frequently enough to outweigh it's non-existent utility as a disciplinary measure in all cases. Unless you want to teach your child to be afraid (which is occasionally the right thing to do, such as smacking their hand away from the hot stove to avoid a serious injury), or that violence is an acceptable tool for dealing with everyday problems, don't hit your children.
 
"I was beat and I turned into a man!" no the fuck you didn't. You're a mentally crippled bitch who talks shit online because you think it makes you tough getting abused by adults.

Like what was already said, if you have to hit your kids, you're a piece of shit parent and should have never had kids. You can't use your words, you just use brute force to try and "make" them change. Pathetic.

If you want your kids to grow up to never talk to you again, then yeah, beat them, bully them like Rampage does to his son. I can't believe how many losers are siding with Sean on this, you're all failed human beings and should never be allowed to be around kids.

Beating kids doesn't change behavior, it creates lying and appeasing to the parents. There's no arguing it, you're a fucking loser human being if you hit kids.
 
View attachment 1118892

Sean Strickland is back in the headlines, this time for promoting child abuse.





View attachment 1118940

he's right. more people need to be slapped growing up

I actually agree with him


As long as you don't hit the head, face, or hit hard where it does damage, just a little fear, and light smacks on the bum or hand.
I just say that i will do it but never actually do it, and my kids listen.
 
Last edited:
Literally every early childhood development expert
Exactly, but these people are so fucking stupid that they think their kid is property and that they "know better," and can do whatever they want.

No wonder this world is fucked and there's so much violence. Kids getting beat for just existing so they go out and shoot up a school.

I hope all of these people that beat their kids end up getting absolutely fucked up by their kids when they are older.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top