Seagal teaches MMA

sensei steve back it again i see
 
Franc Mittelo said:
This is why I laugh at people who think that some of us logical and evidence based couch potato admirers of a sport "don't know anything about MMA" because we don't train and compete.

There is a difference between Fans versus Admirers of the Sport. An admirer of the sport is more logical and evidence-based in his assessment of the sport. Yes, there is always bias, but, bias can be limited when you have an objective paradigm and you stick to it no matter how you feel about a team or athlete.

Therefore, an Admirer of The Sport can watch the sport, pay attention and develop an understanding of the sport without ever participating in it. That is why a guy like Steven Seagal can be a good MMA teacher, regardless of how one feels about Steven Seagal's MMA credentials.

Science and technology are not the same thing. It is possible to know a technology and understand how to use it to your advantage, without having any extensive knowledge of the science behind it.

For example, humans learned how to use electricity and light up the world, before we discovered the science behind electricity.

Most of fighting is "technology," even the coaches and fighters themselves don't really know the "science" behind fighting. It is all technology passed on from one experienced technician to the next. So, it is not that difficult to understand and teach, if you pay attention to it.
Click to expand...


Fighting sports are an art not a science.
 
Do you guys think Seagal is legitimately mentally ill?
 
mikehunt said:
Click to expand...

tim-and-eric-mind-blown.gif
 
this better not be a mocking segal thread. guys a god-dam legend
 
he spends so much on hair replacement
why not spend some on roids to not be fat?
 
Franc Mittelo said:
This is why I laugh at people who think that some of us logical and evidence based couch potato admirers of a sport "don't know anything about MMA" because we don't train and compete.

There is a difference between Fans versus Admirers of the Sport. An admirer of the sport is more logical and evidence-based in his assessment of the sport. Yes, there is always bias, but, bias can be limited when you have an objective paradigm and you stick to it no matter how you feel about a team or athlete.

Therefore, an Admirer of The Sport can watch the sport, pay attention and develop an understanding of the sport without ever participating in it. That is why a guy like Steven Seagal can be a good MMA teacher, regardless of how one feels about Steven Seagal's MMA credentials.

Science and technology are not the same thing. It is possible to know a technology and understand how to use it to your advantage, without having any extensive knowledge of the science behind it.

For example, humans learned how to use electricity and light up the world, before we discovered the science behind electricity.

Most of fighting is "technology," even the coaches and fighters themselves don't really know the "science" behind fighting. It is all technology passed on from one experienced technician to the next. So, it is not that difficult to understand and teach, if you pay attention to it.
Click to expand...

Jesus Christ did this topic really deserve a seriously response? My gawd stfu lol
 
98bird said:
BAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA..... I just watched it again and at the beginning, Segal scared the shit out of the fat dude and he looks into the camera with a "WTF is guy's problem" look.
Click to expand...

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

AW MAN.. YOU RE SO MEAN

I JUST WATCHED THE VID

SERIOUSLY WTF ?????????'???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,960
Messages
58,331,120
Members
176,002
Latest member
Shock7

Share this page

Back
Top