Law SCOTUS Unanimously upholds 8A

Bobby 3 Sticks

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
3,778
Reaction score
2,161
RBG authored the opinion which is odd since she's dead /s

https://slate.com/news-and-politics...ules-against-civil-forfeitures-rbg-timbs.html

Its unanimous decision for the first time prohibits all 50 states from imposing excessive fines, including the seizure of property, on people accused or convicted of a crime.

The Eighth Amendment guarantees that no “excessive fines” may be “imposed,” an ancient right enshrined in the Magna Carta and enthusiastically adopted by the Framers. But the Bill of Rights originally applied only to the federal government, not the states. After the Civil War, the 14th Amendment was ratified to apply these rights to the states, which had engaged in grotesque civil rights violations to perpetuate slavery. The Supreme Court, however, slowly applied (or “incorporated”) these rights against the states one by one, not all at once. And before Timbs, it had never incorporated the Excessive Fines Clause—allowing states to exploit their residents for huge sums of cash and property.

I for one am pleasantly surprised even Thomas went along with this
 
WoW!

Hey Sheriff, no tenny mucho mucho dinero in tu slush fund?
 
RBG authored the opinion which is odd since she's dead /s

https://slate.com/news-and-politics...ules-against-civil-forfeitures-rbg-timbs.html

Its unanimous decision for the first time prohibits all 50 states from imposing excessive fines, including the seizure of property, on people accused or convicted of a crime.

The Eighth Amendment guarantees that no “excessive fines” may be “imposed,” an ancient right enshrined in the Magna Carta and enthusiastically adopted by the Framers. But the Bill of Rights originally applied only to the federal government, not the states. After the Civil War, the 14th Amendment was ratified to apply these rights to the states, which had engaged in grotesque civil rights violations to perpetuate slavery. The Supreme Court, however, slowly applied (or “incorporated”) these rights against the states one by one, not all at once. And before Timbs, it had never incorporated the Excessive Fines Clause—allowing states to exploit their residents for huge sums of cash and property.

I for one am pleasantly surprised even Thomas went along with this

Too late buddy. Already made a thread on it.
 
Good, this bullshit should’ve been stopped long ago.
 
Back
Top