- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 26,142
- Reaction score
- 15,143
15 idiots....
So maybe one wandered in and then another was like, "Where's Joe? I think he went in the cave, I'll go check."
Then "Where's Adam? Didn't he go look for Joe in the cave? I'll go check."
Then: "What happened to Brenda? I know she went to look for Joe and Adam in the cave, I'll go check."
And so on until they were all dead....hence their extinction.
Oh, is that what they're doing?
that's a tad bit hyperbolic.
Only if you're making a semantic argument. I don't mean we're going to blow up the Earth from its core, only that we'll render the planet inhospitable for most of the current forms of life.
Maybe for ourselves at high population levels...Chernobyl, one of our biggest fuck ups to date has had considerably less impact on nature than anyone anticipated.
Even with all our garbage and pollution and other encroachment on the environment, if we vanished from earth today in 10k years, a spec of geological time, there would hardly be a trace we were ever here.
People completely underestimate how robust this planet is. That's not some excuse to say pollution is OK, we just know for a fact that our impact pales in comparison to natural events that happen repeatedly throughout history. We're all freaked over a few meters sea level rise in the next few hundred years...that sucks for coastal cities but honestly, to the earth, that's nothing.
We could take life itself and make it eternal, it could last till the end of the universe
Isn't this a contradiction? Eternal means forever or maybe outside of time. End of the universe seem finite.
My lord. So many gimmicks that never ever break character for thousands of posts then get banned or just leave after awhile only to show up with a new account and a completely different personality.
It's extremely common, especially on Sherdog.
Not commenting directly on Rip btw, just food for thought -point being, it's totally possible for a person to be fairly normal and do that shit on the web to amuse themselves and and a select few in the know.
Well, here's where we have a difference of opinion based on personal belief - I believe the human race, because we have the capacity to bring life, conscienceness, etc to other planets or moons, a very special species indeed. We could keep sentient life, animal life, etc going, well beyond the lifespan of any single planet or star. We could take life itself and make it eternal, it could last till the end of the universe, or be snuffed out on a single backwater shit-hole in no time at all, because the planet was too full of people who didn't appreciate human potential.
I was paranoid about gimmick accounts for a while. The problem is that too few people have consistent and recognizable identities to even be in the running.
So either there aren't a lot of gimmicks, or there are a lot of bad ones. Either way it sucks that another science thread had been hijacked. We don't even deserve them anymore.
the religophile talk is the only thing that kept this ever-interesting topic on page one...if we're being honest.
the religophile talk is the only thing that kept this ever-interesting topic on page one...if we're being honest.
Didn't that guy plan in the E Street band with Springsteen?
![]()
But seriously, very cool.
Sadly you're probably not wrong about that.
Maybe. I avoid a lot of science topics and have refrained from starting interesting science, history of science and philosophy of science threads because they turn into religious anti-science shitfests and those are just tiring to wade through.
The sifting understanding of the modern homo family tree is fascinating, with much fuzzier edges than once thought. The problem is that religious people who invade the conversation.
Maybe. I avoid a lot of science topics and have refrained from starting interesting science, history of science and philosophy of science threads because they turn into religious anti-science shitfests and those are just tiring to wade through.
The sifting understanding of the modern homo family tree is fascinating, with much fuzzier edges than once thought. The problem is that religious people who invade the conversation.
![]()
You guys realize there are only about 2 or 3 "religious people", right? 2 or 3 people aren't "invading the conversation". They are being invited and goaded into the conversation every single time. And once one of them offers their input 20 other posters respond and engage them.
Face it man. The "sifting understanding of the modern homo family tree", ie the redrafting of a modern fairytale, is neither fascinating nor interesting. If it was then posters wouldn't be so anxious to engage the literal 2 or 3 religious posters.
This is the conversation people want to have. Not your silly arts and crafts, make believe science.