Law School Wouldn’t Let Her Son Opt Out Of Class That Promotes Anti-White Racism. Now She’s Suing

False analogy.

Not really. Both Critical Race Theory and Christianity are subjective ideologies. Both are also philosophies that some will strongly agree with and others will be strongly offended by. Nice AV btw.
 
Last edited:
Seeing that the curriculum literally includes sponge bob memes should tell everyone everything they need to know about this, .
They know who their target audience is.
 
Only thing less shocking than this is the racist trash ITT defending it. Don't worry guys it's just one school. Stuff like this never spreads, oh wait...
 
FB-IMG-1609282146562.jpg
 
That's a parody twitter account. I'll assume you're aware of that, but just incase anyone isn't.


Good to know, but there's very little difference in what that parody account says, compared to these critical race grifters who genuinely spread similar messages.

Someone mentioned in another thread, as a parody, how 'rape' could become legitimised and justified by these same people. Something like "rape is an act of power, and black males lack power, so they cannot be legally judged to be rapists. Rape is a tool of white men because white men hold power".

It's fucking ridiculous, but again, it doesn't actually differ that much in terminology to the critical race shite. And there would be a ton of so-called feminists with pink hair supporting the opinion blindly because the dogma has taught them to obey the dogma.
 
Good to know, but there's very little difference in what that parody account says, compared to these critical race grifters who genuinely spread similar messages.

Someone mentioned in another thread, as a parody, how 'rape' could become legitimised and justified by these same people. Something like "rape is an act of power, and black males lack power, so they cannot be legally judged to be rapists. Rape is a tool of white men because white men hold power".

It's fucking ridiculous, but again, it doesn't actually differ that much in terminology to the critical race shite. And there would be a ton of so-called feminists with pink hair supporting the opinion blindly because the dogma has taught them to obey the dogma.

Agreed, but I think it's important to separate the parody from the real stuff as obviously attacking the parody stuff is a complete waste of time.
 
Agreed, but I think it's important to separate the parody from the real stuff as obviously attacking the parody stuff is a complete waste of time.


True, there's plenty of legitimate shit to attack, the parody stuff is a stupid distraction. I just find the whole thing hilarious - James Lindsay being a prime example of the nonsense. Wrote a bunch of fake 'papers' based around these issues that got AWARDED by these SJW movements as prime examples of great work when it was nothing but satire. Absolutely hilarious shit. Grifters, the lot of them.
 
Agreed, but I think it's important to separate the parody from the real stuff as obviously attacking the parody stuff is a complete waste of time.

Sure, but the alarming thing is that people really can't tell anymore. I mean, is there any reason to doubt that that post is legit on it's face? Not like there aren't serious people saying equally ridiculous things.
 
Sure, but the alarming thing is that people really can't tell anymore. I mean, is there any reason to doubt that that post is legit on it's face? Not like there aren't serious people saying equally ridiculous things.

Since you were so confident yesterday in your childish "It's on you, the situation around you, make a choice based upon information never given!!" bullshit on blacks and poverty, did you deign to read either super scary government study that I provided?

You wanna try and defend your useless non-position, or maybe admit that people who live in areas with unique lacks in social investment actually might be less equipped to simply give it all up and get themselves some education that doesn't exist around them?

If not, here they are again. They relate to recidivism, which is super important since it highlights what lack of investment in things like education or housing actually lead to in population groups.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4702282/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135524/
 
Sure, but the alarming thing is that people really can't tell anymore. I mean, is there any reason to doubt that that post is legit on it's face? Not like there aren't serious people saying equally ridiculous things.

No, but I still think it's important to make the distinction, otherwise how do you measure what the problem is and what kind of progress is being made with it?
 
there should be a movement pushing back this ideology. Too bad most white people are onboard with it. Can't help ya if you can't help yourself
 
Since you were so confident yesterday in your childish "It's on you, the situation around you, make a choice based upon information never given!!" bullshit on blacks and poverty, did you deign to read either super scary government study that I provided?

You wanna try and defend your useless non-position, or maybe admit that people who live in areas with unique lacks in social investment actually might be less equipped to simply give it all up and get themselves some education that doesn't exist around them?

If not, here they are again. They relate to recidivism, which is super important since it highlights what lack of investment in things like education or housing actually lead to in population groups.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4702282/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135524/

No Hills, my position remains the same. There is no excuse for being a violent maniac no matter what your skin color or position in life is. That's the end of it. You obviously feel differently, and would put out snacks for a black person violently victimizing you or your family, because you "understand".
 
Not really. Both Critical Race Theory and Christianity are subjective ideologies. Both are also philosophies that some will strongly agree with and others will be strongly offended by. Nice AV btw.

Thanks for the AV compliment, not many people recognize the PJ stickman these days.

I should have expanded on what I meant, but I was strapped for time and hit a quick two word post then bailed. I didn't mean it was a false analogy from an ideology standpoint. I meant that in this case, the class and its curriculum is seemingly designed/sponsored by the school and your analogy sounded more like a rogue teacher pushing a religious ideology.
 
No Hills, my position remains the same. There is no excuse for being a violent maniac no matter what your skin color or position in life is. That's the end of it. You obviously feel differently, and would put out snacks for a black person violently victimizing you or your family, because you "understand".
Ok, so you won't read any data contrary to your generalizations, while we're talking about populations.

"You obviously feel differently, and would put out snacks for a black person violently victimizing you or your family, because you "understand"."

And to think, right wingers wonder why blacks vote against the GOP.........
 
Ok, so you won't read any data contrary to your generalizations, while we're talking about populations.

We were talking about violent crime rates. You seem to want to give one of your pet groups a pass for their absurd domination in this category, because you're a pathetic Liberal sissy who lives in a fantasy land. I don't, because I live in reality. End of debate.
 
Last edited:
Ok, so you won't read any data contrary to your generalizations, while we're talking about populations.

"You obviously feel differently, and would put out snacks for a black person violently victimizing you or your family, because you "understand"."

And to think, right wingers wonder why blacks vote against the GOP.........

Plenty of black Americans vote republican you dolt.
 
Back
Top