Elections School board elections are latest battleground for polarized national politics

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
@Brown
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
4,522
Reaction score
5,488
By Sarah Mueller

maxresdefault.jpg

On Halloween in downtown Coopersburg, a borough nestled in the Lehigh Valley, Doug Durham is handing out candy to trick-or-treaters young and old.

"We're running for school board — appreciate it if you're registered," he said. "Whether you're a Republican or not, the candy's free, so have some candy regardless."

Voters are casting ballots across the U.S. for local and state races – including school boards.

In northeastern Pennsylvania, what a few years ago was a fairly sleepy school board contest focused on millage rates and teacher salaries has turned into a competitive – and combative – race centered on so-called "parental rights."
hq720.jpg

Durham is one of ten candidates vying for one of five spots on the Southern Lehigh school board. It's a race in a swing district in a swing state, and at stake is the chance to dramatically reshape district policy.

Durham's slate of candidates have dubbed themselves the "True Republicans." They received the endorsement of the county GOP committee and signed a pledge that, in part, is aimed at a curriculum review to keep "woke politics" out of the classroom — a move that led to criticism that they want to censor school libraries.
hqdefault.jpg

"We're not book banners. I believe in free speech, but I don't believe that pornography should be available to children in the schools," Durham told local conservative talk show host Bobby Gunther Walsh. "It is fear mongering of the highest order, and it's really unfortunate."

The pledge Durham's group signed includes language about restricting students from using bathrooms that align with their gender identity and informing parents when students ask to go by a different name or gender pronoun.

"[Our opponents] believe that students building trust with teachers and counselors is so important that keeping parents in the dark can be excusable," Durham said. "If a child is going through difficult mental or emotional or physical issues, it's most urgent to get the parents involved to support that child."

MV5BNTdkNzQwMGEtNTBlYS00MWZiLTk2NDctMDgwODJiZmUxOTRjXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMDgyNjA5MA@@._V1_.jpg

Dudley Moore and irk Cameron in Like Father like son

Emily Gehman, who's served on the school board for eight years, said it's a question of privacy.

"Maybe the child is okay talking to a coach or a trusted teacher or a guidance counselor about how to talk to their parents about it," she said. "Yes, parents should absolutely be involved. But if we have a policy that requires [teachers] to pick up a phone in the first five minutes, that does more harm than good."

Gehman is running for reelection. She's a registered Republican, but is running on an opposing slate, along with four moderate Republicans and one Democrat.

"Being endorsed by the Republican Party at the county and local level was contingent upon signing that pledge," she said. "I chose not to sign that pledge."

These type of debates may sound familiar.

3a8d5bf15e5922fead81625cad0afdf3--present-ideas-lego.jpg

"Schools sometimes become frontlines in national political battles," said Dan Hopkins, a professor at University of Pennsylvania.

He said the often noncompetitive school board races of yesteryear are quickly becoming a thing of the past, fueled in part by the COVID-19 pandemic.

"COVID led to a genuinely important shift in the sense that school boards were making very, very meaningful decisions about whether to open or close and many parents had the experience of suddenly having their kids in their houses, and oftentimes they could hear the instruction," he said.

Hopkins said what's happening in the Lehigh Valley is just another example of how local politics have become nationalized. Local candidates take cues from national groups focused on the role of parents in schools – like the far-right Moms for Liberty and its left-leaning counterpart, Stop Moms for Liberty.

Clueless-1.jpg

"These suddenly nationally kind of charged symbols infuse a local political debate," he said.

Christine Slifer, who has two small children in the district, said she can't escape the tension in the school board campaign.

"I'm in some local groups on Facebook — groups that have nothing to do with politics but have stuff to do with the school or the town, and I'm in there just to kind of find out what's going on," she said, sighing. "A lot of it gets brought into there and it's very divisive."

She said she's frustrated by the local coverage of the race.

"It wasn't even focusing on how great Southern Lehigh is for academics or any of our achievements," she said. "It was all these hot button topics – and it doesn't need to be like that. I just don't think it's positive for our kids."

images

https://www.npr.org/2023/11/05/1210...-battleground-for-polarized-national-politics
 
Yeah ive been hearing about this on political podcasts and the like.
Political types/republicans etc getting in on the school boards and ground levels.
Its not indoctrination if I agree with it.
 
This is how our school board election works:

Step 1: the current school board appoints two non-voting members. They can propose issues/solutions, but can't vote on them.

Step 2: the non-voting members on the school board then run as an incumbent.

Step 3: incumbent win. Now, the previously appointed person has voting rights.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

But, things may change next election.

There have been some curriculum changes (specifically in math) that has drawn a lot of attention this school year. We will see if it impacts the election.

Also, of our current crop of school board members, I don't think any actually have kids in our public schools. So, we may see a push for parents to run.
 
"like the far-right Moms for Liberty and its left-leaning counterpart, Stop Moms for Liberty."

If one side is "far-right" wouldn't the counterpart be "far-left"?
 
Last edited:
"These kids are no longer stupid enough to vote for Republicans. We need to stop them learning about reality and science and get them learning about a fictional and largely irrelevant world lifted from the Bible".
 
By Sarah Mueller

maxresdefault.jpg

On Halloween in downtown Coopersburg, a borough nestled in the Lehigh Valley, Doug Durham is handing out candy to trick-or-treaters young and old.

"We're running for school board — appreciate it if you're registered," he said. "Whether you're a Republican or not, the candy's free, so have some candy regardless."

Voters are casting ballots across the U.S. for local and state races – including school boards.

In northeastern Pennsylvania, what a few years ago was a fairly sleepy school board contest focused on millage rates and teacher salaries has turned into a competitive – and combative – race centered on so-called "parental rights."
hq720.jpg

Durham is one of ten candidates vying for one of five spots on the Southern Lehigh school board. It's a race in a swing district in a swing state, and at stake is the chance to dramatically reshape district policy.

Durham's slate of candidates have dubbed themselves the "True Republicans." They received the endorsement of the county GOP committee and signed a pledge that, in part, is aimed at a curriculum review to keep "woke politics" out of the classroom — a move that led to criticism that they want to censor school libraries.
hqdefault.jpg

"We're not book banners. I believe in free speech, but I don't believe that pornography should be available to children in the schools," Durham told local conservative talk show host Bobby Gunther Walsh. "It is fear mongering of the highest order, and it's really unfortunate."

The pledge Durham's group signed includes language about restricting students from using bathrooms that align with their gender identity and informing parents when students ask to go by a different name or gender pronoun.

"[Our opponents] believe that students building trust with teachers and counselors is so important that keeping parents in the dark can be excusable," Durham said. "If a child is going through difficult mental or emotional or physical issues, it's most urgent to get the parents involved to support that child."

MV5BNTdkNzQwMGEtNTBlYS00MWZiLTk2NDctMDgwODJiZmUxOTRjXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMDgyNjA5MA@@._V1_.jpg

Dudley Moore and irk Cameron in Like Father like son

Emily Gehman, who's served on the school board for eight years, said it's a question of privacy.

"Maybe the child is okay talking to a coach or a trusted teacher or a guidance counselor about how to talk to their parents about it," she said. "Yes, parents should absolutely be involved. But if we have a policy that requires [teachers] to pick up a phone in the first five minutes, that does more harm than good."

Gehman is running for reelection. She's a registered Republican, but is running on an opposing slate, along with four moderate Republicans and one Democrat.

"Being endorsed by the Republican Party at the county and local level was contingent upon signing that pledge," she said. "I chose not to sign that pledge."

These type of debates may sound familiar.

3a8d5bf15e5922fead81625cad0afdf3--present-ideas-lego.jpg

"Schools sometimes become frontlines in national political battles," said Dan Hopkins, a professor at University of Pennsylvania.

He said the often noncompetitive school board races of yesteryear are quickly becoming a thing of the past, fueled in part by the COVID-19 pandemic.

"COVID led to a genuinely important shift in the sense that school boards were making very, very meaningful decisions about whether to open or close and many parents had the experience of suddenly having their kids in their houses, and oftentimes they could hear the instruction," he said.

Hopkins said what's happening in the Lehigh Valley is just another example of how local politics have become nationalized. Local candidates take cues from national groups focused on the role of parents in schools – like the far-right Moms for Liberty and its left-leaning counterpart, Stop Moms for Liberty.

Clueless-1.jpg

"These suddenly nationally kind of charged symbols infuse a local political debate," he said.

Christine Slifer, who has two small children in the district, said she can't escape the tension in the school board campaign.

"I'm in some local groups on Facebook — groups that have nothing to do with politics but have stuff to do with the school or the town, and I'm in there just to kind of find out what's going on," she said, sighing. "A lot of it gets brought into there and it's very divisive."

She said she's frustrated by the local coverage of the race.

"It wasn't even focusing on how great Southern Lehigh is for academics or any of our achievements," she said. "It was all these hot button topics – and it doesn't need to be like that. I just don't think it's positive for our kids."

images

https://www.npr.org/2023/11/05/1210...-battleground-for-polarized-national-politics
I know it's easy to talk about culture war issues in regards to stories like this. But, it would be interesting to hear someone run for school board due to issues like:

- curriculum

- graduation rates

- ensuring breakfast and lunches are provided for the those under the poverty line.

- are the kids that are struggling with academics getting the help they need?

- are the kids with higher skills getting challenged?

- should we prioritize ensuring the district hires more staff that actually interact with students, rather than have an office at the district office and 'consult' with other admin?
 
This is how our school board election works:

Step 1: the current school board appoints two non-voting members. They can propose issues/solutions, but can't vote on them.

Step 2: the non-voting members on the school board then run as an incumbent.

Step 3: incumbent win. Now, the previously appointed person has voting rights.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

But, things may change next election.

There have been some curriculum changes (specifically in math) that has drawn a lot of attention this school year. We will see if it impacts the election.

Also, of our current crop of school board members, I don't think any actually have kids in our public schools. So, we may see a push for parents to run.

- What changes?
 
- What changes?
Biggest change has been students must stay in their grade level for math.

For instance, middle school kids that were ready for algebra, used to be allowed to take an algebra class.

That ended.

Now, kids of all levels sit in the same class. It's now simply called "___ grade math".

The kids that are struggling are in the same class as the kids that are bored and unchallenged.

The kids struggling are acting out. The kids that are skilled in math feel ignored.

The teachers are stressed.

This will be the last year of honors level math classes
 
"like the far-right Moms for Liberty and its left-leaning counterpart, Stop Moms for Liberty."

If one side is "far-right" wouldn't the counterpart be "far-left"?

No.

It's a spectrum. Just because one group is "far right" ....the other option does not have to be "far left"

The other group could be centrist, it could be moderately left, far left, or even moderate right

Hell, the other group could even be libertarian, which is neither left or right (at least in theory)
 
"These kids are no longer stupid enough to vote for Republicans. We need to stop them learning about reality and science and get them learning about a fictional and largely irrelevant world lifted from the Bible".

Pretty much.
Replicans and MAGA trash know there policies and public image is turning people, especially the youth away.
So need to get in on the ground levels to brain wash.

Fun part though, is that them banning books has lead to an increase in people reading said books
 
Pretty much.
Replicans and MAGA trash know there policies and public image is turning people, especially the youth away.
So need to get in on the ground levels to brain wash.

Fun part though, is that them banning books has lead to an increase in people reading said books

Oh for sure, the power of the banished text/film/song is immense!

To me at least it's pretty irresistible haha
 
Oh for sure, the power of the banished text/film/song is immense!

To me at least it's pretty irresistible haha

yeah, you tell me a book is banned and im going to find out why then read it.
Cant imagine how fkn easy it is now for kids with internet
 
yeah, you tell me a book is banned and im going to find out why then read it.
Cant imagine how fkn easy it is now for kids with internet

At one point, it was every director's goal to get a 'banned' film, as there was no better way of creating a cult underground classic.

https://www.openculture.com/2019/06/when-stanley-kubrick-banned-a-clockwork-orange.html

Here's an article about Kubrick banning A Clockwork Orange <45>

Anything that's "too dangerous to see" kinda must be seen lol
 
Impressively full of shit and hypocritical! From her pledge. First she writes:

Neutrality
School should be a place of learning and focus, not another battleground in the culture wars. Our community
includes people of many different views from all sorts of different backgrounds. Those views should be
respected. Our district should re-affirm its commitment that administrators, teachers, counselors, and other staff
are required to be politically neutral while acting within the scope of their employment.


But then immediately after, she writes in her pledge:

Reject Woke Politics in Our Schools
Our schools should not be used as a vehicle to indoctrinate our students into partisan, cynical, and divisive ways
of thinking about our country, its history, our fellow citizens, or any particular social or political issue. I commit
to:
• Reject the oppressor/oppressed framework in all district matters
• Reject differing treatment of individuals, or assigning of moral or historical guilt, based on race or other
immutable characteristics
• Reject forced equal outcomes, but instead embrace and cultivate equal opportunity for all
• Reject measures, actions, training, or curriculum based on or driven by critical race theory and the
mechanisms through which its holdings may be implemented
• Propose and vote for a curriculum review process that ensures that woke politics are not introduced or
propagated within our schools

How do you teach about the American revolution, if you reject the "oppressor/oppressed framework" in all matters. Is "no taxation without representation" "woke" now? How do you teach about the triangle shirtwaist factory fire? Slavery?!

This stuff is so vague, as usual, that all sorts of stuff can be labeled as "woke."
 
Last edited:
I liked what the Florida governor, DeSantis, did. School border candidates are typically little known. their positions have not been looked into.

Now with many school children's parents upset over teaching young kids sex education, along with other issues, school border candidates has become more important.

What DeSantis did is to endorse school border candidates, one who he felt were more likely to be against teaching sex to young kids, and promoting racial politics into schools. It worked. Desantis endorsed candidates did quite well in the last election I read.
 
Impressively full of shit and hypocritical! From her pledge. First she writes:

Neutrality
School should be a place of learning and focus, not another battleground in the culture wars. Our community
includes people of many different views from all sorts of different backgrounds. Those views should be
respected. Our district should re-affirm its commitment that administrators, teachers, counselors, and other staff
are required to be politically neutral while acting within the scope of their employment.


But then immediately after, she writes in her pledge:

Reject Woke Politics in Our Schools
Our schools should not be used as a vehicle to indoctrinate our students into partisan, cynical, and divisive ways
of thinking about our country, its history, our fellow citizens, or any particular social or political issue. I commit
to:
• Reject the oppressor/oppressed framework in all district matters
• Reject differing treatment of individuals, or assigning of moral or historical guilt, based on race or other
immutable characteristics
• Reject forced equal outcomes, but instead embrace and cultivate equal opportunity for all
• Reject measures, actions, training, or curriculum based on or driven by critical race theory and the
mechanisms through which its holdings may be implemented
• Propose and vote for a curriculum review process that ensures that woke politics are not introduced or
propagated within our schools

How do you teach about the American revolution, if you reject the "oppressor/oppressed framework" in all matters. Is "no taxation without representation" "woke" now? How do you teach about the triangle shirtwaist factory fire? Slavery?!

This stuff is so vague, as usual, that all sorts of stuff can be labeled as "woke."



That should be all you need to know about Moms for Liberty.
 
Back
Top