[Tycho?]
Brown Belt
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2007
- Messages
- 2,793
- Reaction score
- 0
So in sambo today we were just doing basic positional stuff, good review, etc. My coach showed how to go from side control into kesa gatame (ie no underhood). I asked him why; side control basically gives you that underhook on the far side, why would you give it up? Now I know that it is a good move itself; we've all been under those judo guys who use kesa almost as a submission hold they're so heavy. But the underhook version is far more common in BJJ.
He said it was an issue of strikes. That in an MMA or a street situation, kesa allows greater defense vs strikes, and also protects you from having your face gouged. He demonstrated this by getting kesa and placing his head right next to his partners head. This did indeed make it impossible for his face to be gouged from that position.
Do you guys have any comments or experience on this? I pretty well always perfect the underhook for the sake of control. Do you find that kesa gatame is a safer position to be in, striking wise?
He said it was an issue of strikes. That in an MMA or a street situation, kesa allows greater defense vs strikes, and also protects you from having your face gouged. He demonstrated this by getting kesa and placing his head right next to his partners head. This did indeed make it impossible for his face to be gouged from that position.
Do you guys have any comments or experience on this? I pretty well always perfect the underhook for the sake of control. Do you find that kesa gatame is a safer position to be in, striking wise?