And I must say, it does look a bit different.
I still think the fight should have been stopped in the first round and would have been stopped if this was not in Russia.
In the second round though Fedor did look pretty good and not as unbalanced as I thought. I would also say that my conspiracy theories about Maldonado being less active in the second round sort of went away. First of all, he spent a LOT of energy in the first round and his breathing was pretty hard in the second round. At the same time, whenever he tried to attack, Fedor was actually surprisingly quick to dodge his punches and he did give Maldonado a fair beating in the second round. But.... that kick that Fedor missed - a good fighter would have rushed him immediately after he fell and this could have ended this, but Maldonado didn't react at all, which was odd.
The third round Fedor looked a lot slower, his gas tank was nearing zero - Maldonado's gas tank was also still in recovery - and the number of punches landed in this round... I'd give Fedor a very small edge.
Overall, a tie would definitely have been the best decision. Giving Fedor a win - hmm... I suppose if you see it as a massive come back from a near KO loss, it might make sense. But yeah, home advantage and all - and even if it were not such, I have seen worse judge decisions in the UFC.
But yeah, the best decision would have been a draw. At the same time, giving Fedor a loss here would have been just as controversial as giving him a win.
I suggest everyone takes a second look at this fight.
I still think the fight should have been stopped in the first round and would have been stopped if this was not in Russia.
In the second round though Fedor did look pretty good and not as unbalanced as I thought. I would also say that my conspiracy theories about Maldonado being less active in the second round sort of went away. First of all, he spent a LOT of energy in the first round and his breathing was pretty hard in the second round. At the same time, whenever he tried to attack, Fedor was actually surprisingly quick to dodge his punches and he did give Maldonado a fair beating in the second round. But.... that kick that Fedor missed - a good fighter would have rushed him immediately after he fell and this could have ended this, but Maldonado didn't react at all, which was odd.
The third round Fedor looked a lot slower, his gas tank was nearing zero - Maldonado's gas tank was also still in recovery - and the number of punches landed in this round... I'd give Fedor a very small edge.
Overall, a tie would definitely have been the best decision. Giving Fedor a win - hmm... I suppose if you see it as a massive come back from a near KO loss, it might make sense. But yeah, home advantage and all - and even if it were not such, I have seen worse judge decisions in the UFC.
But yeah, the best decision would have been a draw. At the same time, giving Fedor a loss here would have been just as controversial as giving him a win.
I suggest everyone takes a second look at this fight.