- Joined
- Jun 27, 2003
- Messages
- 19,720
- Reaction score
- 7,580
I don't answer your questions lol. Fuck off.I asked you a question related to the topic of the post and you deflect with this lmao.
Keep crying; Pete Sell lvl thinker.
I don't answer your questions lol. Fuck off.I asked you a question related to the topic of the post and you deflect with this lmao.
Keep crying; Pete Sell lvl thinker.
Dime-a-dozen angry bro that can't address the topic, but has all day to tell everyone to F off; I love it dude.I don't answer your questions lol. Fuck off.
Yeah, pretty sure Ronda made truckloads lolIf she can cite an example of female fighter who is as big of a draw as a male fighter but gets paid less for no other reason than her gender then she would have an argument worth listening to.
I mean this goes for both sexes: the UFC chooses who becomes a draw with propaganda. They control the mics, the edits, the matchmaking, the custom sponsorship deals etc...If she can cite an example of female fighter who is as big of a draw as a male fighter but gets paid less for no other reason than her gender then she would have an argument worth listening to.
What I really think is: you think I'm smart. If we ever argued,, you might even know I'm smart. And you can't reconcile your own shitty politics with your own overrated intellect. You know you've been brainwashed, too. You're embarrassed by your politics. You can show me some "right-wing" crazy shit and possibly make me blush, but you're surrounded by your own liberal horseshit every where you turn. It's spreading like cancer.Dime-a-dozen angry bro that can't address the topic, but has all day to tell everyone to F off; I love it dude.
As NPC as it gets lol.
I'll try again because this is fun:
Why does fighter pay being discussed upset you so much?
lol once again a lot of angry old man rantings for someone who was asked why they're so upset and unable to address the topic of fighter pay.What I really think is: you think I'm smart. If we ever argued,, you might even know I'm smart. And you can't reconcile your own shitty politics with your own overrated intellect. You know you've been brainwashed, too. You're embarrassed by your politics. You can show me some "right-wing" crazy shit and possibly make me blush, but you're surrounded by your own liberal horseshit every where you turn. It's spreading like cancer.
Sherdog is a bit of a hellscape for you, with a lot of conservatives. You want us all to be mouth-breathing Neanderthals, but you know that's not how it is.
You're also jealous of Pete Sell. I doubt that guy's ever been embarrassed, aside from maybe after his loss to Smith. He's one of those dumb guys who goes through life with a smile on his face and no hate his heart, probably making a nice living on the mats and spending time with his own [TRIGGER WARNING] nuclear family [/TRIGGER WARNING]. Liberals tend to resent that, and they don't even know why.
True to an extent, but the talent has to be there. Rhonda was consistently dominating top 10 fighters in her division.I mean this goes for both sexes: the UFC chooses who becomes a draw with propaganda. They control the mics, the edits, the matchmaking, the custom sponsorship deals etc...
It's exploitive.
Rhonda is a perfect example.
Is the UFC cutting promos about the elite talents of random fighters? No
But it's having its richest mouthpieces tell the world she is a once in a lifetime star and giving her that blessing.
It's a circus.
Demonstrably false.Lawrence Epstein, the UFC's chief operating officer, recently told sports business publication Sportico that female athletes are a "huge growth engine" that brings in different audiences for the company.
lol what?True to an extent, but the talent has to be there. Rhonda was consistently dominating top 10 fighters in her division.
The UFC only cares about what makes them money, not the sex, race or sexual orientation of who makes them money.
You have no idea what growth engine means lol.Demonstrably false.
WMMA main events are responsible for the 3 lowest selling PPV's since 2005.
UFC 215: Nunes vs Shevchenko II - 100,000 buys
UFC 224: Nunes vs Pennington - 85,000 buys
UFC 250: Nunes vs Spencer - 85,000 buys
So, I guess you think you're worthy of my respect?lol once again a lot of angry old man rantings for someone who was asked why they're so upset and unable to address the topic of fighter pay.
https://www.salon.com/2021/05/01/th...res-profound-exploitation-inequality_partner/
The mixed martial arts pay-per-view event UFC 261 features two bouts that would have been unheard of just 10 years ago.
Russian-born Valentina Shevchenko will fight Jessica Andrade, a Brazilian and an out lesbian, for the women's flyweight title on April 24, 2021. That same night, Rose Namajunas, an American of Lithuanian descent, will square off against Zhang Weili, who has caused the popularity of the UFC to surge in her native China, for the women's strawweight title.
Image
Title
00:00 00:00
Advertisement:
The rise of women in mixed martial arts – which the late Sen. John McCain once derided as "human cockfighting" – is remarkable, and reflects the diversity and global appeal of the sport.
But as I write in my new book, "Fighting Visibility: Sports Women and Female Athletes in the UFC," it's important for fans and spectators to look beneath the sheen of gender parity.
While women may glow under the bright lights of the Octagon, exploitation and deep inequalities persist.
Advertisement:
Carey Mulligan on the success of women creators in Hollywood
00:49 / 01:47
Ronda Rousey, trailblazer
In 2011, UFC president Dana White famously said that the promotion company would "never" include female fighters. However a year later, the UFC signed Ronda Rousey for a "six-month experiment" in women's MMA.
It paid off.
Rousey became a star unparalleled in women's combat sports history. By 2015, she was the UFC's highest-paid athlete – male or female. Even though Rousey retired from MMA long ago, the UFC continues to court fans by promoting its women fighters.
Advertisement:
Lawrence Epstein, the UFC's chief operating officer, recently told sports business publication Sportico that female athletes are a "huge growth engine" that brings in different audiences for the company. He noted that featuring women had grown the "female fan base" in ways that have "been transformative to the UFC."
The UFC's interest in promoting women has been rare in a sporting landscape that regularly objectifies, trivializes or downright ignores sportswomen and their fans.
Title
00:00 00:00
Advertisement:
Selling a message of empowerment
The phrase "representation matters" is popular across an array of brands and platforms today, and consumers are ready to invest in companies that promote women's and girls' empowerment – including a stereotypically hypermasculine brand like the UFC.
The UFC has come to understand the power of promoting diverse female athletes for expanding their market and boosting profits. This doesn't absolve them from the sexism, racism, xenophobia or transphobia that has characterized the promotion over the years. But it does show that the UFC is willing to give women a platform and sell a message of empowerment.
Advertisement:
The promotion often depicts female fighters as heroines who, against all odds, have broken barriers in MMA and in sports more broadly.
Seeing women be successful in the sport gives an impression that anything is possible and all the challenges female fighters have faced are behind them.
So yes, representation matters, and female fighters have, relative to other sports, high levels of exposure, especially given that just 4% of all global sports media coverage features female athletes.
Advertisement:
But, as retired UFC fighter Julie Kedzie recently told me, "It's not enough to shatter the glass ceiling. You have to clear the glass."
In other words, just because women are in the UFC, it doesn't mean that they're treated fairly.
Representation doesn't end exploitation
The UFC likes to boast that it is unlike any other sport, because female athletes can make as much as men. However, when taking Ronda Rousey out of the equation, there is little evidence to support this.
Advertisement:
The UFC isn't a publicly traded company – at least not yet – so it doesn't have to disclose athlete pay. Due to the difficulty of obtaining a full picture of fighter pay,the UFC can continue to make claims of parity.
However, most estimates put fighter pay at 10% to 20% of the UFC's overall revenue, with the bulk of that distributed toward UFC champions and stars – most of whom are men. As a comparison, NFL and NBA players receive around 50% of revenue the leagues take in.
In my research, I obtained a snapshot of fighter pay from some state athletic commissions. Although the picture is incomplete because not all states or countries require the UFC to disclose fighter pay, the data made available to me suggest that the median payout for female fighters is 68% of what male fighters earn.
Fighting can be lucrative for some. But when compared with an MMA empire worth billions of dollars, the reward for individual fighters can seem minuscule – especially when taking into account the mental and physical toll of the sport.
Title
00:00 00:00
Advertisement:
A "climate of fear"
Part of the issue around pay inequality is that the UFC has successfully thwarted fighters' efforts to unionize and create a path for collective bargaining.
The UFC saves a lot of money because their fighters are independent contractors. This means that fighters must pay for things leagues and teams typically cover in other sports. They fund their own training and coaching, health care, management, retirement investments, recovery therapies and taxes out of their UFC payouts or income from other jobs.
This means that outside of the handful of UFC stars, many fighters struggle to make ends meet.
Advertisement:
In my book I interview former UFC fighters Leslie Smith and Kajan Johnson, who tried to organize fighters before the organization ended its relationships with both athletes. They contend that the UFC treats fighters as employees and incorrectly classifies them as independent contractors. For example, fighters have to submit to random drug testing and wear UFC partners' apparel for their fights, which is atypical of contractual relationships. Smith and Johnson believe that unionization is the best chance fighters have to gain more agency, pay and health care.
Lol, come on man! You can't insert VERY simple logic into the gender "inequality" pay gap "argument". Far too many absolutely clueless ignoramuses out there, like Megan Rapinoe have absolutely 0 clue how to comprehend that type of basic logic."But will Shevchenko get paid to win what Jorge Masvidal – a male athlete also fighting for a title – would be paid to lose?"
Ugh such a stupid fallacy. Mas brings more eyeballs than anyone on that card. These people should fuck off with their idiotic ramblings. There's only a handful of top female fighters compared to men, and only a few of them take fighting seriously.
lol this really screams "I don't make bigoted stereotypes and am decent person" <Lmaoo>Shut the fuck up you (probably) entitled little college graduate woke bitch
It doesn’t matter the age, the race, the gender, etc....If someone is stabbing someone, or about to arm cocked, you shoot em....They only using tasers if someone isn’t carrying a murder weapon, a large knife is a murder weapon, one deep puncture stab and you’ll bleed out, especially to a vital organ. But the diarrhea media will say the cop is a trigger happy murderer. Facts be damned because they have a very clear agenda.
I read some of it , you made the right decisionI ain't reading that shit
Oh I'm not saying I'm perfect, but these kinds of people get out of college thinking they know it all and are professionally offended and either CREATE problems or MAGNIFY problems. I would say I'm a "decent" person in real life overall though. I just don't care for this virtue signaling cancel culture.lol this really screams "I don't make bigoted stereotypes and am decent person" <Lmaoo>