- Joined
- Dec 21, 2006
- Messages
- 10,685
- Reaction score
- 9,961
It’s too late for me…
I was a WWE fan first.
I was a WWE fan first.
It’s too late for me…
I was a WWE fan first.
Same.
I feel like a lot of the UFC blowing up in the 00s came from all those ex-WWE fans from the Attitude and Ruthless Aggression era getting older and looking for something new. The whole "its like pro wrestling but real" selling point. Dudes fighting in a "cage", big characters like Tito, PPVs being named shit like "Payback" and "Vendetta" etc etc and then literally Brock coming over.
Yeah, I'm gonna watch some of those analysis.
Thanks for addressing some.
evidently, it means something because it won dricus the fightMarching foward throwing explosive movements aren't always the most smart and skilled thing to do, aggression means nothing if you are punching the air and the guard
Immediate damage trumps all in scoring, including collective damage . That's not a WWE rule, it's a very valid MMA rule that has existed for 7-8 years. In terms of damage, a jab isn't exactly high on the list.OK, we all know UFC value much more a sloppy showman than a skilled "boring" guy.
From a sport perspective, Since when being "exciting" and " throwing heat" win figths ?
Its the same to give a soccer team who made most beautiful driblles the win over the one that score more goals.
I'm ok if you think DDP won (even through I dont agree)
But I'm really disappointed to see that a lot of people are picking dricus to win because of Sean's lack of "bloodlust" , or cause he was throwing only jabs.
Jabs aren't strikes ? Did you already got hitted by a square jab in your face?
I know UFC are going further and further away from being a "sport" and becoming a "show", but as a fan of combat sports I think its really sad people judging figths picking the most exciting man to win just because of that aspect.
Marching foward throwing explosive movements aren't always the most smart and skilled thing to do, aggression means nothing if you are punching the air and the guard
I'm gonna say again, I dont mind if you think DDP won, but I dont think saying Sean is boring fighter is a plausible justification.
i'm gonna watch it again and try hard as possible not being biased
Not sure if you'd care but if you go to youtube you can see reaction vids from Mighty Mouse, Volk, DC, Izzy, Suga Sean, and Bisping to see why they think DDP won. I get why you wouldn't care about a Sherdogger's opinion but surely those guys know a thing or two.
I picked DDP to win because I thought he might just knock Sean out but I thiugh Sean win the fight (quite easily).OK, we all know UFC value much more a sloppy showman than a skilled "boring" guy.
From a sport perspective, Since when being "exciting" and " throwing heat" win figths ?
Its the same to give a soccer team who made most beautiful driblles the win over the one that score more goals.
I'm ok if you think DDP won (even through I dont agree)
But I'm really disappointed to see that a lot of people are picking dricus to win because of Sean's lack of "bloodlust" , or cause he was throwing only jabs.
Jabs aren't strikes ? Did you already got hitted by a square jab in your face?
I know UFC are going further and further away from being a "sport" and becoming a "show", but as a fan of combat sports I think its really sad people judging figths picking the most exciting man to win just because of that aspect.
Marching foward throwing explosive movements aren't always the most smart and skilled thing to do, aggression means nothing if you are punching the air and the guard
I'm gonna say again, I dont mind if you think DDP won, but I dont think saying Sean is boring fighter is a plausible justification.
i'm gonna watch it again and try hard as possible not being biased
Im South African and very proud of Dricus, coach Morne and team CIT, legendary effort from EFC to KSW to UFC staying the same team.a lot of these people hating sean strickland are triggered liberals.
they are grasping at straws to avoid realizing the failures of their world view.