- Joined
- Jul 19, 2010
- Messages
- 58,347
- Reaction score
- 20,924
Massing artillery and outgunning the enemy is largely a function of logistics.
Not when you can mobilize thousands of old soviet stocks via trains into the country, you don't need to be supplying dozens of different battle groups through an ever changing battlefield.
Artillery units consume way more resources than infantry do. Attacking an enemy with highly advanced western weapons while being outnumbered at least 3 to 1 was, to put it lightly, not a good plan.
Sure, but Russia had plenty of stock, on the other hand look at how badly the infantrymen are, the expired rations, troops complaining about lack of water, vehicles running out of gas etc, etc.
The reason why Ukraine outnumbers Russia as badly as this is because they have mobilized their population.
And they have the West helping them train and supply them with basic goods.
Russia was outnumbering Ukraine at the start of the war, the Kyiv offensive was massive and the only reason it failed wasn't because Ukraine superior numbers, but because of Russian shitty logistics, what has changed that would make Russia fare better with another 40 mile convoy?
Russia needs more troops to bring about parity in numbers, at the very least, in order to have a chance of winning in the long run.
Russia can't win in the long run, not anymore.
Attacking Ukraine in the first place was stupid; attacking Ukraine in a half assed way because your officers are lying all the way down is shockingly stupid.
They were planning for a 3 days war and ran out of supplies in the first month.