• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Russia/Ukraine Megathread V6

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hahaha. Honestly, you're fucking hilarious. People will surely laugh at you, as they always have I'm sure.
You make me a lot of fun, I enjoy to see so educated ppl like you.

You don't know anything about Finland, it is so....easy to see....

Most laughable thing is that here is easy to see that you are ....pro troll. While dumb.

I can imagine how ppl from Finand laugh about your " skills, education and interest " level in.....internet trolling...

Really laughable nice small troll.
 
Wrong, as usual. The US and allied forced operated under the Europe First or Germany First strategy.

"In 1944 and 1945, the balance of U.S. resources shifted heavily toward Europe as the Europe First strategy became a reality rather than just a stated objective. At war's end in Europe, the U.S. Army had 47 divisions in Europe and 21 divisions, plus 6 Marine Corps divisions, in the Pacific. 78% of Army and Army Air Force manpower was deployed against Germany versus 22% deployed in the Pacific."
Where to begin?
. You are derailing again - off topic.
. You are wrong again.
. You said you did not believe in sources. It is all fake news. No maps remember?
. You proved me right - again: "1944 and 1945, the balance of U.S. resources shifted heavily toward Europe." So, what happened to US forces from 1941 to 1944?

* Here is your unlisted source by the way:
Europe first - Wikipedia
Review the 'Opposition' section:
"The American people favored early action against Japan. In one of the few public opinion polls taken during the war, in February 1943, 53% of Americans said that Japan was the 'chief enemy' compared to 34% choosing Germany. A later poll showed that 82% of Americans believed that the Japanese were more 'cruel at heart' than Germans. As a consequence of the immediate threat and the need to contain Japan's advance across the Pacific, American resources allocated to the defeat of Japan initially exceeded those allocated to Europe. In the first six months the U.S. was in the war, the U.S. army deployed more than 300,000 soldiers overseas to the Pacific while less than 100,000 were sent to Europe."

Now, back to the Russian/Ukraine conflict.
 
I now realise this is likely a result of your socio-economic background, and for this I apologise.
My social economic background? What exactly does that mean? Is that a hidden racial connotation? Does @Strychnine need to get involved for a possible 'yellow?' What does my socio-economic background have to do with anything?
If you would like to imrpove your English feel free to private message me and I can put you in touch with a good tutor in Oxford.
Well, let's look at your spelling mate:
. realize, not realise
. apologize, not apologise
. improve, not imrpove
Maybe you should look up your tutor in Oxford, your English sucks.
 
You make me a lot of fun, I enjoy to see so educated ppl like you.

You don't know anything about Finland, it is so....easy to see....

Most laughable thing is that here is easy to see that you are ....pro troll. While dumb.

I can imagine how ppl from Finand laugh about your " skills, education and interest " level in.....internet trolling...

Really laughable nice small troll.
I can see that you are very highly educated yourself, our little discussion here makes it very clear. Must be the highest level of education in Russia, congratulations.
The whole world is laughing at you and your crappy country, soon you poor bastards are working for the chinese, how does that make you feel?
 
Where to begin?
. You are derailing again - off topic.
. You are wrong again.
. You said you did not believe in sources. It is all fake news. No maps remember?
. You proved me right - again: "1944 and 1945, the balance of U.S. resources shifted heavily toward Europe." So, what happened to US forces from 1941 to 1944?

* Here is your unlisted source by the way:
Europe first - Wikipedia
Review the 'Opposition' section:
"The American people favored early action against Japan. In one of the few public opinion polls taken during the war, in February 1943, 53% of Americans said that Japan was the 'chief enemy' compared to 34% choosing Germany. A later poll showed that 82% of Americans believed that the Japanese were more 'cruel at heart' than Germans. As a consequence of the immediate threat and the need to contain Japan's advance across the Pacific, American resources allocated to the defeat of Japan initially exceeded those allocated to Europe. In the first six months the U.S. was in the war, the U.S. army deployed more than 300,000 soldiers overseas to the Pacific while less than 100,000 were sent to Europe."

Now, back to the Russian/Ukraine conflict.

Initially, like the first months of the conflict in 1941, but by mid 1942 the shift to Europe (and Africa) started.

There was no where for US forces to actually fight in Europe when the war kicked off, Germany controlled it all. It took years to build up and plan for the D-Day invasion.
 
I've been active in this thread, and I want to keep it going. Let's all just stop the insults and get back to the subject at hand.

We're all adults. Let's start acting like it and remember...

This $hit ain't personal unless you're IN Ukraine right now trying to survive.
 
I've been active in this thread, and I want to keep it going. Let's all just stop the insults and get back to the subject at hand.

We're all adults. Let's start acting like it and remember...

This $hit ain't personal unless you're IN Ukraine right now trying to survive.
i put most of the eejits in this thread on ignore, nobody got time to read that shite
 
I've been active in this thread, and I want to keep it going. Let's all just stop the insults and get back to the subject at hand.

We're all adults. Let's start acting like it and remember...

This $hit ain't personal unless you're IN Ukraine right now trying to survive.
I agree but if ppl didn't had interest about countries natural resources and economy history before february, it is easy to see.

Sadly we too are impacted.
We have 1. Threats from this Russia.
2. Not small ammount $$$$$$$$$ allocated for refugees.
3. Disturbed supplies.
4. All this brainwashing stuff aka like from Kremlin.
If for example someone even can't list natural resources Finland does have, then is trolling....
I for example don't know about Nigeria and Argentina etc and never had posted anything about their resources and economy. Never. Cos I don't know.


I might be happy to keep polite discussion unless if someone is trolling too much.
 
Who cares about ww2 in a thread about 2022 war.
Strategy and tactics for one. Lessons not learned.
May 9th was Russia's (and Putin's) unofficial surrender to Ukrainian forces. It is just downhill from here for Russia.
 
giphy.gif
I know the feeling. Some folks just don't get it.
 
Strategy and tactics for one. Lessons not learned.
May 9th was Russia's (and Putin's) unofficial surrender to Ukrainian forces. It is just downhill from here for Russia.
I don't think that he surrounded.
As bare minimum he most likely will order to dig trenches and not to step back.

However I think.....at least some % of ppl in Russia had get ____ what stuff is outcome cos kleptocracy in long term___
With Kursk they looks that didn't had get lesson & this stuff really was in excellent shape, refubrished and just 6 years old & very expensive.
 
“As we have said many times before, NATO expansion does not make the world more stable and secure,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

Says the pricks marching into another sovereign state and killing that region's people.


Honest question for Europeans in here. Do you guys really actually pay attention to the level of horse shit coming out the Turkish PM mouth?

And if i was Finland id be pretty concerned about Russia as well.
 
Strategy and tactics for one. Lessons not learned.
May 9th was Russia's (and Putin's) unofficial surrender to Ukrainian forces. It is just downhill from here for Russia.

I would feel tactics of conflict that is nearly 80 years old are a bit outdated considering 10 to 20 years can bring changes to battlefield

My countrys military changes tactics like every 15 years due advancement of technology etc
 
Honest question for Europeans in here. Do you guys really actually pay attention to the level of horse shit coming out the Turkish PM mouth?
Yeah.
Looks that he is scared cos Sweden took as political refugees some regime opponents from Turkey.
Didn't had sent them back to Turkey etc...............
Strange stuff.
 
Honest question for Europeans in here. Do you guys really actually pay attention to the level of horse shit coming out the Turkish PM mouth?

And if i was Finland id be pretty concerned about Russia as well.
Turkey is no problem, they are only trying to gain some leverage in EU and elsewhere. Nothing serious.
Russia is also no concern, Finland has been preparing for a war with Russia for over 70 years.
 
I would feel tactics of conflict that is nearly 80 years old are a bit outdated considering 10 to 20 years can bring changes to battlefield

My countrys military changes tactics like every 15 years due advancement of technology etc


id imagine consider the Russian still use Soviet style tactics from the 1980s i dont think theyd reach to far inland. Especially if they decide that attacking you in winter
 
Honest question for Europeans in here. Do you guys really actually pay attention to the level of horse shit coming out the Turkish PM mouth?

In Ireland he is widely regarded as being a shite talker and a bigot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top