Russia/Ukraine Megathread V6

Status
Not open for further replies.
meauneau said:
Does Russia openly and blatantly support Nazis like Zelenskiy and Ukraine do?

No one denies that there are Nazis in Russia.
Click to expand...

SandisLL said:
Nice next work, I hope you will get your paycheck for your work here.
You are an entertainment fo me, this is getting relax cycle more funny.
Now I predict next casual NLP and manipulation type posts here.....
Click to expand...

These back and forth arguements are comical because what Putin is doing is genocide, which makes him no better then Hitler and the Nazi regime.
 
PEB said:
"

Quoting a French intelligence source, a reporter from leading French daily Le Figaro has revealed that the highly-trained special forces from the United Kingdom and the United States have been stationed in Ukraine since Russia launched its 'special military operation' in the region on February 24.

As the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Kyiv on Saturday and pledged to stand by the people of the country, Georges Malbrunot, a senior reporter for Le Figaro, highlighted the presence of elite military units in the eastern European nation.

"Boris Johnson's visit to Kyiv confirms London's place as Ukraine's first ally. “Elite SAS special forces units have been present in Ukraine since the beginning of the war, as have the American Deltas,” confides a French intelligence source," tweeted Malbrunot.

"The Russians don't ignore it, they know what the secret war is," he added in another tweet quoting his unnamed source as the newspaper included their reporter's input in their updates on the ongoing conflict."

But yeah no active military present on the ground French want nothing on it.

https://www.indianarrative.com/worl...ict-with-russia-says-french-daily-163587.html
Click to expand...

I don't think that this is reality.
Cos then they feeded more weapons to Ukraine and faster.
 
PEB said:
Quoting a French intelligence source, a reporter from leading French daily Le Figaro has revealed that the highly-trained special forces from the United Kingdom and the United States have been stationed in Ukraine since Russia launched its 'special military operation' in the region on February 24.
Click to expand...
Man, you are hardheaded!
The French reporter is wrong, as are many American reporters. These idiots don't know the difference between active and retired personnel. They don't know the difference between a soldier and a Marine. The British, French, and Americans have no active Army personnel on the ground in Ukraine. Those are all retired veterans volunteering their services.
 
I will just leave this here Kirkstone residence have had F35 practice drills over their houses the last few weeks most of them believe it is over the Ukraine war preparation or wider conflict getting serious. Right around 8 am regularly.

 
PEB said:
"
"Boris Johnson's visit to Kyiv confirms London's place as Ukraine's first ally. “Elite SAS special forces units have been present in Ukraine since the beginning of the war, as have the American Deltas,” confides a French intelligence source," tweeted Malbrunot.


But yeah no active military present on the ground French want nothing on it.

https://www.indianarrative.com/worl...ict-with-russia-says-french-daily-163587.html
Click to expand...

An unnamed French "intelligence source"? Ok.

Delta is the most secretive group of operators from the US, if not the planet. They operate outside of normal DoD parameters. Only a very small handful of individuals are privy to their operations. These guys don't wear regular uniforms, they don't fight on the front lines with the grunts, and they sure as hell don't advertise. One could be in the room with you and he probably wouldn't stand out.
 
Last edited:
Blayt7hh said:
Don’t be confused though. The Taliban did not do this on their own either. They’ve been getting foreign aid too.
Click to expand...

You can't compare the foreign aid the Taliban got with what the Afghan army got, the big difference is that the Taliban had the will to fight, the Afghan army didnt.
 
Rod1 said:
You can't compare the foreign aid the Taliban got with what the Afghan army got, the big difference is that the Taliban had the will to fight, the Afghan army didnt.
Click to expand...
That’s not the whole story dude. Us pulling out suddenly and leaving them with a bunch of equipment they can’t afford or maintain played a big role. In fact it probably contributed to them not want to fight
 
Blayt7hh said:
That’s not the whole story dude. Us pulling out suddenly and leaving them with a bunch of equipment they can’t afford or maintain played a big role. In fact it probably contributed to them not want to fight
Click to expand...

The Afghan Army never existed in the first place, the US pulled out but promised to keep helping the Afghan government with weapons and logistics.
 
FQyD1Q5VsAkXIYT




on a sidenote: meet the Army's new replacement for the m4. So long 5.56nato.
 
Siver! said:
He's 'winning the information war', but nobody 'showing their audience this'?

Is that like saying 'Russia has won the war', but 'fighting still continues'?

<45>
Click to expand...
His audience are hearing the message. I assure you he couldn't care any less if an INCEL on a Sherdog forum cares or not. Hate to break it to ya kiddo but Ukraine is not going to win.
 
Omni1 said:
His audience are hearing the message. I assure you he couldn't care any less if an INCEL on a Sherdog forum cares or not. Hate to break it to ya kiddo but Ukraine is not going to win.
Click to expand...

Oh, you mean he's winning the information war in Russia?

Apologies, then, because there's no way I'd deny that. Bang on. He obviously is.

He's winning the information war internationally? Absolutely not, but I'd be prepared to listen to it on a country-by-country basis, because I've no doubt the Russian narrative might be stronger in some places than others.

As for 'Ukraine is not going to win', that's a bold statement in a conflict that is currently in a 'stalemate' (not my words), and in which Russia has yet to address serious challenges and has struggled since the beginning to boast many strategic victories at all.

I suppose you can easily temper 'Ukraine is not going to win, but neither is Russia', which is certainly what Western defence experts are saying.

There really isn't a 'victory' in sight for Russia, as even the 'successful' occupation of territories is likely to lead to insurgencies for many years to come.
 
Siver! said:
Oh, you mean he's winning the information war in Russia?

Apologies, then, because there's no way I'd deny that. Bang on. He obviously is.

He's winning the information war internationally? Absolutely not, but I'd be prepared to listen to it on a country-by-country basis, because I've no doubt the Russian narrative might be stronger in some places than others.

As for 'Ukraine is not going to win', that's a bold statement in a conflict that is currently in a 'stalemate' (not my words), and in which Russia has yet to address serious challenges and has struggled since the beginning to boast many strategic victories at all.

I suppose you can easily temper 'Ukraine is not going to win, but neither is Russia', which is certainly what Western defence experts are saying.

There really isn't a 'victory' in sight for Russia, as even the 'successful' occupation of territories is likely to lead to insurgencies for many years to come.
Click to expand...

I agree with the stalemate comment but I highly doubt any serious insurgency. There isn't the young population to sustain it, in the east the population seems pretty Russified and it's bad terrain for it as well.
 
Denter said:
I agree with the stalemate comment but I highly doubt any serious insurgency. There isn't the young population to sustain it, in the east the population seems pretty Russified and it's bad terrain for it as well.
Click to expand...

The population SPEAKS Russian, but they are not pro-Russia - this is just one of many miscalculations by Putin.

Konrad Muzyka, an independent defence analyst, said that Mariupol was the most pro-Russian city in Ukraine, which is mind-boggling - the idea that places like Donetsk and Luhansk are pro-Russian comes from referendums on LANGUAGE, and the fact that Russian separatists backed by Russia itself have been in control for almost a decade.

If the Donbas was legitimately pro-Russian, it would be Russian by now - it's not, because the Donbas does not want to be part of Russia.

Russia's best course of action is to 'win' this region is to flood it with Russians, fake some referendums, and wave some flags - which is no doubt the plan.

What we're seeing is an attempt at occupation, not Russification - the bottom line is, the war has forced Ukrainians to flee the region, but I can't buy into the idea that the region is 'Russified'.
 
IDGETKTFO said:
what Putin is doing is genocide, which makes him no better then Hitler and the Nazi regime.
Click to expand...
Wait… when did Putin demonize a race of people and send them to concentration camps, use for science in horrific fashion, and murder millions of them in the gas chambers?

you hyperbolic leftist sheep are a site to behold
 
tibba said:
@KnightTemplar. You still after the pow abuse videos ?
Click to expand...
Oh boy. I saw some vids of POW hangings, a crucifixion set on fire, a tied-up POW getting shanked to death with a 10" Bowie knife, incapacitated POWs getting brained.

These are on sites that you don't want to go on unless you're ready to see how bad the rest of the World really is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,283,101
Messages
58,482,445
Members
176,050
Latest member
Krazy Kash Patel

Share this page

Back
Top