• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Russia Collusion Megathread v.10: one guilty plea, two indictments, one resignation

Status
Not open for further replies.
wood

gettyimages-8131078462.jpg
I can't even "wood" that one. She's evil incarnate. This whore scab was more than happy to not only criminally defend somebody who was one of the people Magnitsky was murdered for exposing, but then went on to lobby for Vlad against the Magnitsky Act. There is not a shallow enough grave for this bitch's bones.
 
I can't even "wood" that one. She's evil incarnate. This whore scab was more than happy to not only criminally defend somebody who was one of the people Magnitsky was murdered for exposing, but then went on to lobby for Vlad against the Magnitsky Act. There is not a shallow enough grave for this bitch's bones.

My wiener is able to disassociate a meat pocket from the "person".

@Casey Anthony, give me a call . . .
 
Lol. Now the female Russian that Jr. met with is telling Bloomberg that he offered to review sanctions if they gave him dirt on Hillary. She also said she’s willing to tell Mueller also if called upon.


And that's another shoe. This is a tie-in to why you don't get involved in the first place. Because simply agreeing to discuss something inappropriate gives the other party leverage over you.

I'm going to note that this proposed testimony falls in perfectly with the general idea of maximum chaos/turmoil. And if they get concessions and favorable terms
along the way, great. But the negotiations aren't in good faith, and that's the source of the "they're not your friend"
 
If trump owned a taxi company and some russians used one of his taxis (and secured it through a third party broker) would that count as collusion? If not, then why for shipping?


Yeah trump didn't know a thing about any of it. Lol.

He was warned about Manafort from the beginning
 
Dump the Trump! We want justice! When do we want it? Now!
Dump the Trump! We want justice! When do we want it? Now!
Unlike the "lock her up!" crowd, I'll wait until there's good evidence.
I do feel safe saying "lock up Flynn! Lock up Manafort!"
 
And that's another shoe. This is a tie-in to why you don't get involved in the first place. Because simply agreeing to discuss something inappropriate gives the other party leverage over you.

I'm going to note that this proposed testimony falls in perfectly with the general idea of maximum chaos/turmoil. And if they get concessions and favorable terms
along the way, great. But the negotiations aren't in good faith, and that's the source of the "they're not your friend"

And the lawyer and crew are happy to testify because it create even more turmoil amongst ourselves, which benefits Russia. No need to ever attack us head on, Russia has succeeded in helping start our implosion. They won the cold war as far as I'm concerned here. And no, it didn't end with the fall of the USSR.
 
I think anyone taking RT as a serious news source is being wilfully ignorant, as is anyone who buys the "many sides' doublespeak of this habitually dishonest con man President.
I don't think he allows a single speaking opportunity to slip by without using it to lie about something, it's extraordinary.

If you read my post correctly you would see I am referring to RT as a propaganda outlet, not a serious news source, certainly no more serious a news source than CNN.
 
Yeah, it's pretty well known at this point that the Russian government also agitated people on the left.

The issue here is what groups may have coordinated with the agitation, or otherwise cooperated.

If that were the issue then the Podesta Group and fusion GPS would be under the same pressure. Unfortunately the investigation is partisan.
 
Of course they’re the same. The world is an economic competition. Always has been. If you don’t get that you’re just a part of a herd.
...of course, CNN isn't the same as a propaganda rag owned in part by Putin, a man who did everything he could to sway our election and has had political enemies murdered.
Get real.
 
Affected is a verb in action, effected is for something that has happened.

It affected the farmers in fantasy land.

In fantasy land, the farmers were effected.

Just use impact instead. That's what I do. I don't want to get caught slipping while I'm baked.

Not the past vs. present so much as what you said in the first part.

I AM effected. Adverb for a state of being or a passive verb

IT affected me. Verb

Or something like that
 
Not the past vs. present so much as what you said in the first part.

I AM effected. Adverb for a state of being or a passive verb

IT affected me. Verb

Or something like that

Or the whole noun vs verb thingy
 
...of course, CNN isn't the same as a propaganda rag owned in part by Putin, a man who did everything he could to sway our election and has had political enemies murdered.
Get real.

Diversify your news sources to see how tabloid CNN really is. Read vox, zerohedge, the hill, politico, fox, msnbc, RT, al jazeera. Read them all. None are beacons of truth, but at least having a wider perspective will help you place CNN where it belongs.
 
Diversify your news sources to see how tabloid CNN really is. Read vox, zerohedge, the hill, politico, fox, msnbc, RT, al jazeera. Read them all. None are beacons of truth, but at least having a wider perspective will help you place CNN where it belongs.

Dude, almost no one on this forum watches CNN except you butthurt alt-right dorks to get your dose of self inflicted outrage porn.
 
There is also all of this too.


Guilt by association. Its like saying the fact that I and Alaweed bin Talal both own shares in Citibank means I have "Saudi ties".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top