Russia Collusion Megathread v.10: one guilty plea, two indictments, one resignation

[TheComebackKid]

In one post, you laughably asserted that wikileaks was impeccable in their truthful record. He brings info to the contrary, and you riposte with "Well, in this case" smh.

Where do I say "well, in this case"?

 

[hillelslovak87]

Where do I say "well, in this case"?

I think you already realize that I was not making a verbatim claim of what you said, but was mentioning the redirect on your part.

 

[TheComebackKid]

I think you already realize that I was not making a verbatim claim of what you said, but was mentioning the redirect on your part.

What redirect?

 

[hillelslovak87]

What redirect?

The one from your post I addressed. Jesus, keep up.

 

[TheComebackKid]

The one from your post I addressed. Jesus, keep up.

You're being very vague hence my follow up question. If you can't be specific and actually articulate your criticism then perhaps you shouldn't be in the discussion?

 

[HomerThompson]

Leaked docs were edited

The information presented in these reports have stood up to scrutiny. The transfer rates indicate the files were downloaded locally.



Our intelligence agencies have never examined the servers themselves. They also spent the first 6 months of the Trump administration making good on Chuck Schumers claim about the intelligence community having 6 ways from Sunday to get back at you. Hard to trust those guys, ya know?

Independent analysis also shows the files were hacked locally.

Independent journalist also conclude that Russia didn't hack the emails. They also conclude the files were downloaded locally. Some even conclude that Seth Rich stole them.

Maybe vague references to "independent analysis and journalists" doesn't carry much weight?



You're way too emotional about this. If you can't discuss the topic without resorting to name calling and hyperbolic statements like "Russian-installed tool"(LMAO) then maybe we should agree to disagree.

Hello.

 

[hillelslovak87]

You're being very vague hence my follow up question. If you can't be specific and actually articulate your criticism then perhaps you shouldn't be in the discussion?

Is this vague to you, and lacking articulation? Or did you simply choose to focus on the phrase "Well in this case"?

"In one post, you laughably asserted that wikileaks was impeccable in their truthful record. He brings info to the contrary, and you riposte with "Well, in this case" smh."

.............

 

[rokzilla]

Hello.

Lmfao he airbrushed confidential to catch reporters attention. It doesn’t say he edited anything else.

 

[HomerThompson]

Lmfao he airbrushed confidential to catch reporters attention. It doesn’t say he edited anything else.

Airbrushed? Also, the narrative has always been that everything released was 100% authentic. This casts huge doubt on that.

 

[Sycho Sid]

Don't worry @Junes is a shit poster who adds nothing to any forum he participates in.

Don't expect any funny or informative posts from him. No insight or Lols will be had.

He'll just hang around the periphery hoping people notice him until his wife tells him he's had enough internet for the month.

So he is hans gruber?

 

[Pickle Rick]

So he is hans gruber?

<[analyzed}>

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

I can't see him being impeached without a substantial money trail--which is what 90% of this case is ultimately about. Something in the tens or hundreds of millions in USD. And same for Manafort and Gates receiving lengthy prison sentences. It's not happening without them laundering 8+ figures.

I'm not saying this because I don't want them punished fully, just that they won't be because it will set a precedent that the DOJ wouldn't or couldn't enforce considering how much money laundering takes place.

Oh, at this point I have no doubt that many are guilty of more than will be proven.
Dirty hands everywhere in this administration

 

[FIMN]

Oh, at this point I have no doubt that many are guilty of more than will be proven.
Dirty hands everywhere in this administration

Yep. I can only hope this will lead to a political bloodbath that will show in no uncertain terms how far Republicans would have enabled this treasonous behaviour to extend.

If Hillary, Podestas etc need to indicted too then bring it on.

No prisoners (figuratively). Lots of prisoners in a literal sense.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

Yep. I can only hope this will lead to a political bloodbath that will show in no uncertain terms how far Republicans would have enabled this treasonous behaviour to extend.

If Hillary, Podestas etc need to indicted too then bring it on.

No prisoners (figuratively). Lots of prisoners in a literal sense.

Agreed. Throw a dead cat in that town right now you're just as likely to hit a Russian. Time for a purge

 

[FIMN]

Agreed. Throw a dead cat in that town right now you're just as likely to hit a Russian. Time for a purge

Yup.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_between_Trump_associates_and_Russian_officials

Nothing to see here

 

[Diamond Jim]

Another lie exposed.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

Another lie exposed.

Every time they say they never met Russians, they mean there's no Russians they didn't meet.

 

[HereticBD]

Airbrushed? Also, the narrative has always been that everything released was 100% authentic. This casts huge doubt on that.

That "narrative" was pushed by the same intelligence agencies you so willfully trust, on anything to do with Trump and Russia.

The emails have been confirmed as legit. It's not some theory. Now, in fairness, there is a slight margin for error, but to believe that margin is all the bad stuff you don't want to believe, is ridiculous.

 

[rokzilla]

Airbrushed? Also, the narrative has always been that everything released was 100% authentic. This casts huge doubt on that.

It literally says it in the tweet. And yeah you’re going to be splitting serious hairs if a couple of emails from Tony Podesta have confidential but he majority of the emails and untouched and the body of the emails are true.