Russia Collusion Megathread v.10: one guilty plea, two indictments, one resignation

[HOLA]

Well, we need to dig a little deeper.


What exactly did they conclude?



Russians hacked into election related computer systems. Absolutely.

Russians stole the dnc email? Absolutely false. It has been proven the dnc emails were leaked by an insider.


So again, what are you claiming they concluded?


Like most of the arguments from the left, beyond the surface, they crumble under any amount of scrutiny.

Let me guess, Seth Rich stole them?

 

[bobgeese]

Let me guess, Seth Rich stole them?

I'm not sure. What I am sure of is that experts have stated the transfer rate was too high to be conducted via an outside party.

 

[HOLA]

I'm not sure. What I am sure of is that experts have stated the transfer rate was too high to be conducted via an outside party.

Jesus. A blogger named "The Forensicator" working with Kim DotCom is not an expert.

It was over 1 year ago they stated Russia was responsible for the emails.

The Obama administration on Friday officially accused Russia of attempting to interfere in the 2016 elections, including by hacking the computers of the Democratic National Committee and other political organizations.

The denunciation, made by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security, came as pressure was growing from within the administration and some lawmakers to publicly name Moscow and hold it accountable for actions apparently aimed at sowing discord around the election.

 

[bobgeese]

Jesus. A blogger named "The Forensicator" working with Kim DotCom is not an expert.

It was over 1 year ago they stated Russia was responsible for the emails.

The Obama administration on Friday officially accused Russia of attempting to interfere in the 2016 elections, including by hacking the computers of the Democratic National Committee and other political organizations.

The denunciation, made by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security, came as pressure was growing from within the administration and some lawmakers to publicly name Moscow and hold it accountable for actions apparently aimed at sowing discord around the election.

See, here comes that damn scrutiny again.


First off, multiple experts have stated that.



Second,

And when exactly did the government agencies receive the dnc servers to evaluate it? Was it before or after what you just stated?


Feel free to back out of this conversation before embarrassing yourself further.

 

[method115]

It was the CIA, the FBI, the NSA and The Office of the Director of National Intel - which oversees the 17 agencies.

So, technically it was 4...but that doesn't somehow invalidate the conclusions.

Yes and none of them ever gained physical access to the server. They were handed documentation from a third party company which was very odd.

 

[Quipling]

Yes and none of them ever gained physical access to the server. They were handed documentation from a third party company which was very odd.

They were not giving the actual physical servers. That much is correct.

Being given the relevant data rather than the physical hard drives is not "very odd," though. That's just a piece of bullshit you swallowed whole when you heard it from some other person.

 

[bobgeese]

Yes and none of them ever gained physical access to the server. They were handed documentation from a third party company which was very odd.

Good sir, those are facts you're trying to use on a liberal. In case you're not aware, they are in fact allergic to facts. May I suggest going with a more "feelz" based approach.

 

[HOLA]

See, here comes that damn scrutiny again.


First off, multiple experts have stated that.



Second,

And when exactly did the government agencies receive the dnc servers to evaluate it? Was it before or after what you just stated?


Feel free to back out of this conversation before embarrassing yourself further.

Oh no, I'm blushing so hard. Hope I don't pee myself! Mercy Bob!

Just listen to the words of a Trump aide, "excellent guy" according to Trump:

n or about April 26, 2016, defendant PAPADOPOULOS met the Professor for breakfast at a London hotel. During this meeting, the Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS that he had just returned from a trip to Moscow where he had met with high level Russian government officials. The Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS that on that trip he (the Professor) learned that the Russians had obtained “dirt” on then-candidate Clinton. The Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS, as defendant PAPADOPOULOS later described to the FBI, that “They (the Russians] have dirt on her”; “the Russians had emails of Clinton”; “they have thousands of emails.”

 

[bobgeese]

Oh no, I'm blushing so hard. Hope I don't pee myself! Mercy Bob!

Just listen to the words of a Trump aide, "excellent guy" according to Trump:

n or about April 26, 2016, defendant PAPADOPOULOS met the Professor for breakfast at a London hotel. During this meeting, the Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS that he had just returned from a trip to Moscow where he had met with high level Russian government officials. The Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS that on that trip he (the Professor) learned that the Russians had obtained “dirt” on then-candidate Clinton. The Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS, as defendant PAPADOPOULOS later described to the FBI, that “They (the Russians] have dirt on her”; “the Russians had emails of Clinton”; “they have thousands of emails.”

So you've now changed the topic because it could not stand up to scrutiny, which is exactly what I stated.


Now, if you'll make your point about whatever nonsense you're trying to convey in the post above, I will do the same for that. If you feel you've embarrassed yourself enough here, I would agree.

 

[HOLA]

So you've now changed the topic because it could not stand up to scrutiny, which is exactly what I stated.


Now, if you'll make your point about whatever nonsense you're trying to convey in the post above, I will do the same for that. If you feel you've embarrassed yourself enough here, I would agree.

I thought the topic was Russia stealing the emails?

What did I change it to?

 

[Quipling]

So you've now changed the topic because it could not stand up to scrutiny, which is exactly what I stated.


Now, if you'll make your point about whatever nonsense you're trying to convey in the post above, I will do the same for that. If you feel you've embarrassed yourself enough here, I would agree.

His post is literally the same topic as the OP. Yours aren't.

 

[bobgeese]

I thought the topic was Russia stealing the emails?

What did I change it to?

What emails?


The dnc emails, no.

Hillary Clinton's emails, I have no idea.

 

[bobgeese]

His post is literally the same topic as the OP. Yours aren't.

He stated "muh agencies", when pushed with scrutiny he tried to shift to something else.


Sherdog 101.

 

[RockstarChris]

People in the middle east were very nice when i was there. That doesnt mean that i want their governments interfering in elections here.

i didnt say anything about the middle east and 2 people have quoted me about the middle east. lol

 

[PEDS Help me Post]

Trump's a bumbling moron.


The Clinton's are far more monstrous though. They should be investigated far more thoroughly.

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

George Papadopoulos?

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

17 agencies???

Holy shit, your talking points are WAY out of date. Why don't you go ahead and find out the real story behind "muh 17 agencies".


Lol at the rest of your post. Enjoy the YEARS of Trump presidency you have to come.

Here are the big 6

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

> These indictments are nothing! Just money laundering charges for things he did a long time ago!
> *runs off to post in thread to post conspiracies about uranium 1 deals that happened in 2010 that the FBI and DOJ already knew about*

Just a normal day in Trump bot world.

That was before he knew PapaDaps was wearing a wire:

 

[bobgeese]

Here are the big 6

See, here comes that damn scrutiny again.


Nobody is claiming Russian intelligence didn't hack into election systems. This is well know, and not new.

Notice in your video, they did not specify exactly what was hacked.

The Russians did not hack the dnc emails. This is not debatable. Furthermore, why did the dnc try to deny the FBI from looking at their servers?

They also said Russians tried to spread misinformation. Ok. So does CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, etc, etc. The fact is, everyone who's hated Hillary Clinton, has hated her for years.


Hell, the right has been beating on the Clinton's for decades. Don't blame us, for the dnc stealing the nomination from Bernie..

 

[RockstarChris]

the judge should just slame his hammer and say "she lost. get over it."